Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sharing Experiences and Stressors at Work and at Home: A Model of Work-Linked Couples

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Occupational Health Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Work-linked couples are couples who are connected in some way by their work. We focus on understanding work-life experiences of one type of work-linked couple – dual-military couples, or those couples in which both spouses are enlisted or commissioned by the military. Our goal was to develop a model that not only explains and predicts dual-military couples’ experiences, but also extends beyond this specific group and provides a conceptual model for work-linked couples in all occupational settings. Data from 82 soldiers whose spouses were also in the military were collected during 19 focus groups. We conducted an inductive analysis on transcripts of the focus groups to guide the discovery of themes. Second, a deductive process was used to apply components of the dual-military model to themes that emerged during inductive coding. We identified a set of 11 specific themes, organized into the two main areas of Time and Planning and Boundary Separation and Integration. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. PCS refers to Permanent Change of Station a military term which describes moving due to a new job, and relocating to a new duty station.

References

  • Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.3363315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Westman, M., & Hetty van Emmerik, I. J. (2009). Advancements in crossover theory. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910939304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, A. J., Scott, K. M., & Whiteford, H. A. (2013). Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-regression. Psychological Medicine, 43, 897–910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 175–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/352378.

  • Bond, J. T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Prottas, D. (2003). The 2002 national study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulger, C. A., Matthews, R. A., & Hoffman, M. E. (2007). Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(4), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.365.

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19, 418–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/259269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M., Carlson, D., Kacmar, K. M., & Halbesleben, J. R. (2016). The supportive spouse at work: Does being work-linked help? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben, J. R., Zellars, K. L., Carlson, D. S., Perrewé, P. L., & Rotondo, D. (2010). The moderating effect of work-linked couple relationships and work–family integration on the spouse instrumental support-emotional exhaustion relationship. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 371. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben, J. R., Wheeler, A. R., & Rossi, A. M. (2012). The costs and benefits of working with one's spouse: A two-sample examination of spousal support, work–family conflict, and emotional exhaustion in work-linked relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the COR: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40, 1334–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L. K. (2016). Counseling military families: What mental health professionals need to know. In NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E. (1997). The concept of boundaries in counselling and psychotherapy. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 25, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069889708253798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., Dukes, E. M., & Wittchen, H. (2008). Human and economic burden of generalized anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 25, 72–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, A. H., & Payne, S. C. (2006). The challenges and benefits of dual-military marriages. In Military Life: The psychology of serving in peace and combat [Four Volumes]. Bridgeport, CT: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janning, M. Y. (1999). A conceptual framework for examining work-family boundary permeability for professional married co-workers. Women and Work, 1, 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janning, M. (2006). Put yourself in my work shoes. Variations in work-related spousal support for professional married coworkers. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05277811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janning, M. Y., & Neely, B. E. (2006). Work-family integration for professional married co-workers: An examination of cross-realm conversations. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 79–86 http://www.jstor.org/stable/23028787.

  • Jennings, J. E., & Jennings, P. D. (2015). The work–family interface strategies and experiences of US owner-managers: Implications for satisfaction and perceived effectiveness. In Jennings, Eddleston, Jennings, & Sarathy (Eds.) Firms within Families: Enterprising in Diverse Country Contexts. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Jones, J. L., Davis, W. D., & Thomas, C. H. (2017). Is competition engaging? Examining the interactive effects of goal orientation and competitive work environment on engagement. Human Resource Management, 56, 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, G. E. (2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: a person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., & Sweet, S. (2002). Two careers, one employer: Couples working for the same corporation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 466–483. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2002.1886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez, B., Mayo, M., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Geurts, S., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Garrosa, E. (2009). Effects of work–family conflict on employees’ well-being: The moderating role of recovery strategies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rantanen, M., Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Rantanen, J. (2011). Do individual coping strategies help or harm in the work–family conflict situation? Examining coping as a moderator between work–family conflict and well-being. International Journal of Stress Management, 18, 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, S. A., Wilcox, S. L., Campbell, S., Kim, A., Finney, K., Barr, K., & Hassan, A. M. (2015). A brief introduction to the military workplace culture. Work, 50, 9–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robie, C., Brown, D. J., & Shepherd, W. J. (2005). Interdependence as a moderator of the relationship between competitiveness and objective sales performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 274–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, L., Henderson, A. D., & Gilmartin, S.K. (2008). Dual-career academic couples: What universities need to know. Stanford, CA: Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research. Retrieved from: http://gender.stanford.edu/dual-career-research-report.

  • Sobecks, N. W., Justice, A. C., Hinze, S., Chirayath, H. T., Lasek, R. J., Chren, M. M., Aucott, J., Juknialis, B., Fortinsky, R., Youngner, S., et al. (1999). When doctors marry doctors: a survey exploring the professional and family lives of young physicians. Annual Internal Medicine, 16, 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staines, G. L. (1980). Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and nonwork. Human Relations, 33, 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678003300203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westman, M. (2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54(6), 717–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726701546002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westman, M., & Etzion, D. (1995). Crossover of stress, strain and resources from one spouse to another. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1991). The fine line: Boundaries and distinctions in everyday life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences and W. A. Franke College of Business, Northern Arizona University, South San Francisco Street, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA

    Ann Hergatt Huffman

  2. Department of Psychological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA

    Nora Dunbar

  3. Department of Psychology, Clemson University, 418 Brackett Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA

    Zachary P. Klinefelter

  4. College of Business, Oregon State University, 1500 SW Chandler Ave, Bend, OR, 97702, USA

    Satoris S. Howes

Authors
  1. Ann Hergatt Huffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nora Dunbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zachary P. Klinefelter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Satoris S. Howes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Hergatt Huffman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huffman, A.H., Dunbar, N., Klinefelter, Z.P. et al. Sharing Experiences and Stressors at Work and at Home: A Model of Work-Linked Couples. Occup Health Sci 2, 157–180 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-018-0017-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-018-0017-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation