Schmalenbach Business Review

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 189–208 | Cite as

The Opportunity Costs of Becoming a Dean: Does Leadership in Academia Crowd Out Research?

Original Article

Abstract

Researchers in academia typically perform different tasks: research, teaching and services to the scientific community. We analyze the opportunity costs in terms of a potentially reduced publication productivity associated with becoming a dean in the German institutional setting where deans are non-professional expert-leaders who temporarily take the dean position. Theoretically, we distinguish between two different effects that relate deanship and publication productivity: a resource effect where publication productivity during and—as a result of potentially having developed a taste for service—also post deanship decrease as a result of a reduction of the available time for research and a self-selection effect where pre-deanship publication productivity is lower than that of peers who are not about to become dean. Based on a dataset of 1110 business and economics researchers from German-speaking universities, we find evidence for a resource effect with leadership in academia reducing research productivity during and also post deanship. We find no evidence of a negative self-selection effect in the sense of less successful researchers being more likely to take the position of a dean. Reduced research productivity during and post deanship as compared to those researchers that never became dean is driven by those researchers who become dean in later periods of their career, i. e., presumably by those who deliberately shift their focus away from research and towards a stronger engagement in the scientific community in their late career years. Early career deans, on the contrary, seem to see their deanship more as a transitory role and are able to compensate the reduced resources during deanship, and they also do not suffer from a reduced publication productivity post deanship.

Keywords

Leadership Opportunity costs Academia Resource effect Self-selection Expert leader 

JEL-Codes

D23 D73 H83 I23 M12 M21 M5 

References

  1. Aguinis, Herman, Gideon P. de Bruin, Danielle Cunningham, Nicole L. Hall, Steven A. Culpepper, and Ryan K. Gottfredson. 2010. What does not kill you (sometimes) makes you stronger: Productivity fluctuations of journal editors. Academy of Management Learning & Education 9(4):683–695.Google Scholar
  2. Ayaita, Adam, Kerstin Pull, and Uschi Backes-Gellner. 2017. You get what you ‘pay’ for: academic attention, career incentives and changes in publication portfolios of business and economics researchers. Journal of Business Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0880-6.Google Scholar
  3. Backes-Gellner, Uschi, and Axel Schlinghoff. 2010. Career incentives and “publish or perish” in German and US universities. European Education 42(3):26–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Backes-Gellner, Uschi, and Eva Zanders. 1989. Lehre und Forschung als Verbundproduktion: Data-Envelopment-Analysen und organisationsökonomische Interpretationen der Realität in wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fachbereichen. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 59(3):271–290.Google Scholar
  5. Bäker, Agnes. 2015. Non-tenured post-doctoral researchers’ job mobility and research output: an analysis of the role of research discipline, department size, and coauthors. Research Policy 44(3):634–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bäker, Agnes, and Amanda H. Goodall. 2017. The best academics make the best heads of department. Times Higher Education, 04.05.2017 Google Scholar
  7. Bäker, Agnes, Susanne Breuninger, Julia Muschallik, Kerstin Pull, and Uschi Backes-Gellner. 2016. Time to go? (Inter-)national mobility and appointment success of young academics. Schmalenbach Business Review 17(3):401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolli, Thomas, and Jörg Schläpfer. 2015. Job mobility, peer effects, and research productivity in economics. Scientometrics 104(3):629–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellison, Glenn. 2002. The slowdown of the economics publishing process. Journal of Political Economy 110(5):947–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, Ian M., and Luanna H. Meyer. 2003. Motivating the professoriate. Higher Education Management and Policy 15(3):151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox, Mary Frank .1992. Research, Teaching, and Publication Productivity: Mutuality Versus Competition in Academia. Sociology of Education 65(4):293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodall, Amanda H. 2009. Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities. Research Policy 38:1079–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodall, Amanda H., and Agnes Bäker. 2015. A theory exploring how expert leaders influence performance in knowledge-intensive organizations. In Incentives and Performance: Governance of Knowledge-Intensive Organizations, ed. Isabell M. Welpe, Jutta Wollersheim, Stefanie Ringelhan, and Margit Osterloh, 49–68. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Goodall, Amanda H., John M. McDowell, and Larry D. Singell. 2017. Do economics departments improve after they appoint a top scholar as chairperson? Kyklos 70(4):546–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hattie, John, H. W. Marsh. 2016 The Relationship Between Research and Teaching: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research 66(4):507–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hollis, Aidan. 2001. Co-authorship and the output of academic economists. Labour Economics 8(4):503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krapf, Matthias. 2011 Research evaluation and journal quality weights. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 81(1):5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krücken, Georg, Albrecht Blümel, and Katharina Kloke. 2013. The managerial turn in higher education? On the interplay of organizational and occupational change in German academia. Minerva 51(4):417–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manchester, Colleen, and Debra Barbezat. 2013. The effect of time use in explaining male-female productivity differences among economists. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 52(1):53–77.Google Scholar
  20. Rauber, Michael, and Heinrich W. Ursprung. 2008. Life cycle and cohort productivity in economic research: the case of Germany. German Economic Review 9(4):431–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor, Susan W., Blakely Fox Fender, and Kimberly Burke Gladden. 2006. Unraveling the academic productivity of economists: the opportunity costs of teaching and service. Southern Economic Journal 72(4):846–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft für Betriebswirtschaft e.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uschi Backes-Gellner
    • 1
  • Agnes Bäker
    • 1
  • Kerstin Pull
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations