Skip to main content
Log in

Rationality Meets Ren: beyond Virtue Catalogues for a World Business Ethos

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Humanistic Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Confucian tradition, which places the virtue of ren or fellow feeling at its heart as a ‘gateway’ to the more concrete virtues of common Western parlance, offers a potential antidote to the excesses of a Western business ethics which, even after its recent academic reembrace of the Aristotelian tradition, in practice still too often instrumentalises virtue in the service of a ‘rational’ or ‘reasonable’ constraining of the profit motive. The deeper, intrinsic ‘ethos’ promised by a Confucian approach also finds its echo in the West in the work of Hans Küng’s Weltethos (World Ethos) project, led today on the business ethics front by Klaus Leisinger and Claus Dierksmeier. This paper explores a dilemma at the heart of the World Ethos movement seen from the twin peaks of the World Ethics Institute at Peking University and the Weltethos Institut at the University of Tübingen: namely, whether a business ethics culture accustomed to thinking in terms of CSR-esque lists of corporate values, virtues or principles can best be reformed via documents like the UN Global Compact, the 2010 Global Economic Ethic Manifesto, or even the UN Sustainable Development Goals, or whether a more radical, revolutionary quest for an inner ‘ethos’, to be lived and experienced by self-cultivating individuals engaged in business all over the world regardless of background, ought somehow to be undertaken parallel to these endeavours. The authors outline possible steps towards such a transformation of the management community’s understanding of virtue, without, however, dismissing the contribution of traditional, dilemma-oriented Western thinking about applied ethics in general, and business ethics in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Natürlich kann man nicht von vornherein allen Menschen trauen. Ich bin normalerweise bereit, mir begegnenden Menschen einen gewissen Vertrauensvorschuss zu gewähren. Aber es gibt immer wieder solche, die ernsthaften Anlass zu Misstrauen geben. Und darüber hinaus gibt es eine unerfreuliche Gattung von Menschen, die auch in Politik, Wirtschaft, Kultur und Wissenschaft zu finden sind, wenngleich sie sich nicht immer als solche zu erkennen geben. Doch ihr Parfum ‘Egoist’ verrät sie. Sie glauben bestenfalls an sich selber und sonst buchstäblich an nichts (lat.: nihil).

    […] Nihilismus, Zynismus und Hämismus sind destruktive Lebenseinstellungen, die bei sich und anderen die echte Lebensfreude verderben können. Gibt es doch unerfreuliche Exemplare der Gattung Mensch - ich denke da auch an früherer Erfahrungen in Fakultätssitzungen zurück -, deren Präsenz oder Nichtpräsenz die ganze Atmosphäre des Zusammenseins verändert. Man möchte solchen zumeist launenhaft-miesepetrigen Zeitgenossen, die ihren Mitmenschen und sich selber das Leben schwer machen, wünschen, dass ihnen etwas mehr echte Lebensfreude geschenkt werde.

References

  • Alzola, M. 2012. The possibility of virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly. 22 (2): 377–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alzola, M. 2015. Virtuous persons and virtuous actions in business ethics and organizational research. Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (3): 287–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alzola, M. 2017. Character-based business ethics. In The Oxford handbook of virtue, ed. N. Snow. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, S., and M. Slote, eds. 2013. Virtue ethics and Confucianism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M. 1869. Culture and anarchy, http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/4212/pg4212.html, 1st ed. 1869 (accessed 11/6/2017).

  • Barnes, J. 2001. Aristotle: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besser-Jones, L. and Slote, M. 2015. The Routledge companion to virtue ethics. Routledge Philosophy Companions.

  • Chen, H. 2007. The economic principles of confucius and his school. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C.-Y. 2015. ‘Confucian religiousness and its implications for interreligious dialogue.’, Paper presented at the International Society for Chinese Philosophy 19th International Conference (Chinese Philosophy in the Contemporary World), Chinese University of Hong Kong, 21–24 July 2015.

  • Collins, D. 1987. Aristotle and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 6: 567–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. E. 2016. The necessity of self-help lit. Hedgehog Review 18(3): http://www.iasc-culture.org/THR/THR_article_2016_Fall_DavisNecessity.php (accessed 11/6/2017).

  • Dierksmeier, C. 2011. The freedom-responsibility Nexus in management philosophy and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 101: 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. 2013. Kant on Virtue. Journal of Business Ethics 113 (4): 597–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. 2016a. Qualitative Freiheit. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. 2016b. Reframing economic ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C., and A. Celano. 2012. Thomas Aquinas on justice as a global virtue in business. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2): 247–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C., and M. Pirson. 2009. Oikonomia versus Chrematistike: Learning from Aristotle about the future orientation of business management. Journal of Business Ethics 88: 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y. 2015(1948). A short history of Chinese philosophy. Beijing: Foreign Languages Teaching and Research Press.

  • Fromm, E. 2006(1956). The art of loving. Harper perennial modern classics.

  • Hartman, E.M. 2013. Virtue in business: An Aristotelian approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, G. 1988. Confucian thought and east Asian modernization (Rujia Sixiang yu Dongya Xiandaihua). Taipei: Juliu Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hühn, M.P., and C. Dierksmeier. 2016. Will the real Adam Smith please stand up. Journal of Business Ethics 136 (1): 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Q. 2012. A Confucian constitutional order: How China’s ancient past can shape its political future. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang Y. 2010(1897). Study of Confucius as a Reformer (Kongzi Gaizhi Kao). Beijing: Zhongguo Renmin Daxue Chubanshe.

  • Kazuhiro, T. 2014. Ito Hirubumi: Japan’s first prime minister and father of the Meiji constitution. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H. 1990. Project Weltethos. München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H. 2002. Whither Weltethos? Religion and Ethics in the Age of Globalisation (Wozu Weltethos? Religion und Ethik in Zeiten der Globalisierung). Freiburg: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H. 2004. Islam: Past, present and future (Der Islam: Geschichte, Gegenwart, Zukunft). München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H. 2010. What I believe (was ich glaube). München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H., et al. 1993. Declaration Toward a Global Ethic. Parliament of the World’s Religions, Chicago: https://parliamentofreligions.org/pwr_resources/_includes/FCKcontent/File/TowardsAGlobalEthic.pdf (accessed 15/4/2017).

  • Küng, H., et al. 2010. Global economic ethic manifesto (manifest Globales Wirtschaftsethos). München: dtv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K. 2018. Die Kunst der Vertrauensvollen Führung (The Art of Trustful Management), 2018. Bern: Haupt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J.R. 1965. Confucian China and its modern fate: A trilogy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. 2016. The inspiration of contemporary Confucian entrepreneurship. Confucius Studies 2016 (2): 15–23.

  • Lin Y. 2009. Economic development and the revival of Chinese culture (Jingji Fazhan yu Zhongguo Wenhua de Fuxing). Beijing Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban), 2009:3.

  • Liu S. 1992. Liu Shuxian’s selected writings on new Confucianism (Liu Shuxian Xin Ruxue Lunzhu Jiyao). Jing H. (Ed.). Beijing: Zhongguo Guangbo Dianshi Chubanshe.

  • Mahfouz, N. 1997. Naguib Mahfouz: Harvest of the word (Nağīb Maḥfūẓ: Haṣād al Qawl). Rasheed El Enany (Ed.). Cairo: Al Mağlis al Hay'a al 'Āla Lil Ṯaqāfa.

  • Metzger, T.A. 1977. Escape from predicament: Neo-Confucianism and China's evolving political culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mou Z. 1997. Nineteen lectures in Chinese philosophy (Zhongguo zhexue shijiu jiang).(Shanghai, Guji Chubanshe.

  • Niedenführ, M. 2018. Managementinnovation aus China? Der emerging trend des ‘Confucian entrepreneur’. Deutsch-Chinesische Wirtschaftsvereinigung Jahrbuch 67–75.

  • Nussbaum, M. 2013. Political emotions: Why love matters for justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 1962. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 2009(1966). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press.

  • Schwartz, B.I. 1985. The world of thought in ancient China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. 2014. The soul of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shibusawa, E. 1928(1916). The Analects and the Abacus (Rongo to Soroban). Tokyo: Chuseido.

  • Solomon, R. 1992. Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (3): 317–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. 1794/1980. Account of the life and writings of Adam Smith LL.D. In Essays on philosophical subjects, ed. A. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu W. 2002a. Collected works: Volume two (Du Weiming Wenji: Di’er Ce). Wuhan Chubanshe.

  • Tu, W. 2002b. Collected works: Volume five. Wuhan: Wuhan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W. 2010. The global significance of concrete humanity: Essays on the Confucian discourse in cultural China. New Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilisations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W. 2014a. The global implications of the doctrine of Ren: The humanistic Spirit and ecological awareness of Confucianism. Confucian Academy 1: 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu W. 2014b. The thought of Tu Weiming: Selected academic articles of Tu Weiming’s thought (Du Weiming Sixiand Xueshu Wenxuan). Shanghai Guji Chubanshe.

  • Tu, W. 2017. Spiritual humanism: An Emerging global discourse (speech delivered at the 2015 International Institute of Philosophy Conference). 2015 IIP Conference Proceedings. Wuhan: Changjiang Literature & Art Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. 2000. Chuanxilu. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1905/2011. The Protestant ethic and the Spirit of capitalism. Trans. Stephen Kalberg. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y. 1992. Qian mu and the new Confucianism (Qian mu yu Xin Rujia). Zhongguo Wenhua 6.

  • Yu, J. 2007. The ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of virtue. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T. 2012. All-under-heaven and methodological relationism: An old story and new world peace. In Contemporary Chinese political thought: debates and perspectives, eds. Fred Dallmayr and Zhao Tingyang, 46–66. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Keir.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keir, J., Zongrang, B. Rationality Meets Ren: beyond Virtue Catalogues for a World Business Ethos. Humanist Manag J 3, 187–201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-018-0050-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-018-0050-1

Keywords

Navigation