Homo Oeconomicus

, Volume 35, Issue 1–2, pp 111–116 | Cite as

A Different Perspective on Current Problems: Comment on “Proposals for a Democracy of the Future” by Bruno Frey

  • Marta Orviska


We analyse the proposals put forward by Bruno Frey in a recent paper on extending democracy. On the whole we do not agree with Professor Frey on these proposals. Although, we do this with some hesitation in light of the enormous contribution he has made to the discipline of economics over several decades. Our comments are focused on two issues. Firstly the impact such extensions would have on participation rates, i.e. the probability of an individual voting. Secondly, we argue that perceived dissatisfaction with the state of democracy is to a large extent a consequence of economic developments following the global financial and economic crisis of the last decade. The solution is not so much to focus on democracy, but to solve the economic problems.


Electoral participation Democracy Information technology The economic crisis 

JEL Classification




I would like to thank Manfred Holler for his encouragement in preparing this contribution and also for his very helpful comments on a first draft. He is not responsible for any remaining errors and omissions.


  1. Bailey, D. J., Clua-Losada, M., Huke, N., Ribera-Almandoz, O., & Rogers, K. (2018). Challenging the age of austerity: Disruptive agency after the global economic crisis. Comparative European Politics, 16(1), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cox, G. W., & Munger, M. C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures and turnout in the 1982 US house elections. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deary, I. J., Corley, J., Gow, A. J., Harris, S. E., Houlihan, L. M., Marioni, R. E., et al. (2009). Age-associated cognitive decline. British Medical Bulletin, 92(1), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dow, G. K. (2001). Allocating control over firms: Stock markets versus membership markets. Review of Industrial Organization, 18(2), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
  6. Frey, B. S. (1997). A constitution for knaves crowds out civic virtues. Economic Journal, 107(443), 1043–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frey, B. S. (2017). Proposals for a democracy of the future. Homo Oeconomicus, 34(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansmann, H. (1996). The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Orviska, M., Caplanova, A., & Hudson, J. (2005). Intended electoral participation in transition countries. Economics of Governance, 6(3), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Orviska, M., & Hudson, J. (2003). Tax evasion, civic duty and the law abiding citizen. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Orviska, M., & Hudson, J. (2009). Dividing or uniting Europe? Internet usage in the EU. Information Economics and Policy, 21(4), 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tridimas, G. (2017). On Sortition. Comment on “Proposals for a Democracy of the Future” by Bruno Frey. Homo Oeconomicus. Scholar
  14. Woolley, S. C. (2016). Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics. First Monday, 21(4). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsMatej Bel UniversityBanska BystricaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations