Reaction of wild eggplant Solanum torvum to different species of root-knot nematodes from Turkey
The cultivated eggplant species are susceptible to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). However, many wild Solanum species, such as S. torvum, S. sisymbriifolium, S. aethiopicum and S. warscewiczii, are resistant to some root-knot nematodes. Only S. torvum is employed as a rootstock for eggplant cultivation worldwide. This study investigated the response of S. torvum cv. Hawk against the root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita, Mi-1 virulent M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria and M. luci and M. hapla from Turkey, under controlled conditions. A local eggplant cultivar and a commercial eggplant hybrid were included in the bioassay. Eggplant seedlings were each inoculated with 1000 second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne spp. and uprooted 8 weeks after nematode inoculation. Then, egg masses and galls on the roots were counted. S. torvum was resistant to M. incognita, Mi-1 virulent M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria and M. luci, but susceptible to M. hapla. In Turkey, S. torvum has commonly been used as a rootstock against Meloidogyne spp. The study provided background information of S. torvum rootstock resistance to the mentioned populations of root-knot nematodes, except M. hapla.
KeywordsEggplant Resistance Host response Root-knot nematode Solanum torvum
The authors would like to thank Multi Tohum Tar. San. Tic. A.Ş. (Antalya, Turkey) for providing eggplant and tomato seedlings.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aydınlı G (2014) Orta Karadeniz Bölgesi seralarındaki kök-ur nematodu (Meloidogyne spp.) populasyonları üzerinde araştırmalar. Dissertation, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, p 143Google Scholar
- Cook R, Evans K (1987) Resistance and tolerance. In: Brown RH, Kerry BR (eds) Principles and practice of nematode control in crops. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 179–231Google Scholar
- Daunay MC, Dalmasso A (1985) Multiplication de Meloidogyne javanica, M. incognita et M. arenaria sur divers Solarium. Revue Nématol 8:31–34Google Scholar
- Devran Z, Süğüt MA, Gözel U, Tör M, Elekcioglu IH (2008) Analysis of genetic variation between populations of Meloidogyne spp. from Turkey. Russ J Nematol 16:143–149Google Scholar
- Devran Z, Söğüt MA, Mutlu N (2010) Response of tomato rootstocks with the Mi resistance gene to Meloidogyne incognita race 2 at different soil temperatures. Phytopathol Mediterr 49:11–17Google Scholar
- Devran Z, Başköylü B, Taner A, Doğan F (2013) Comparison of PCR-based molecular markers for identification of Mi gene. Acta Agric Scand Sect B J Soil Sci 45:395–402Google Scholar
- Hartman KM, Sasser JN (1985) Identification of Meloidogyne species on the basis of different host test and perineal pattern morphology. In: Barker KR, Carter CC, Sasser JN (eds) An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne. Methodology, vol 2. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, pp 69–77Google Scholar
- Mıstanoğlu I, Özalp T, Devran Z (2016) Response of tomato seedlings with different number of true leaves to Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949. Turk J Entomol 40:377–383Google Scholar
- Moens M, Perry RN, Starr JL (2009) Meloidogyne species—a diverse group of novel and important plant parasites. In: Moens M, Starr JL, Pery RN (eds) Root-knot nematodes. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 1–17Google Scholar