Susceptibility of the Box tree pyralid Cydalima perspectalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to potential biological control agents Neem (NeemAzal®-T/S) and entomopathogenic nematodes (Nemastar®) assessed in laboratory bioassays and field trials
- 162 Downloads
The Box tree pyralid Cydalima perspectalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) is one of the accidentally introduced organisms that became invasive and established in Europe within a few years. Thus, eco-friendly preparations are required, which should be accessible, affordable, easy usable and suitable for the application in private and public areas. Therefore, the effects of the plant extract formulation NeemAzal®-T/S (active ingredient Azadirachtin A) and the commercial preparation Nemastar® (entomopathogenic nematode species Steinernema carpocapsae) were investigated on C. perspectalis larvae in laboratory bioassays and field trials. When NeemAzal®-T/S-treated leaf discs were consumed by larvae in the laboratory, a significant effect on mortality and feeding activity was noted after 14 days of exposure. At this time, 47–62% of the larvae had already died and less than 10% of larvae were still feeding. Application of different S. carpocapsae suspensions (10–200 EPN/100 μl, i.e. per larva) demonstrated a high susceptibility of both tested larval instars (2nd: 10–75% and 4th: 45–100% mortality). In field trials neither the application of Nemastar® nor the use of NeemAzal®-T/S caused mortality rates comparable to those generated by the treatment with plant protection products based on Bacillus thuringiensis. In conclusion, there is a higher variability in terms of the effects of the investigated agents compared to the constant effectiveness of B. thuringiensis. But their use would be possible if individual feeding damage and proper surveillance will be considered in order to be capable of repeating the application timely and a combination with further measures ought to take place.
KeywordsBuxus Biological control Feeding activity Larval mortality
We would like to express our gratitude towards the Arthur and Aenne Feindt-Foundation (Hamburg), for the generous support of this work as a part of the project “Development of friendly methods for monitoring and regulating the Box tree pyralid, Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), an invasive pest in ornamentals”.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Choo HY, Kaya HK, Lee SM, Kim TO, Kim JB (1991) Laboratory evaluation of enthomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora against some forest insect pests. Korean J Appl Entomol 30(4):227–232Google Scholar
- Efil L, Ozgen I, Yardim EN (2005) Effects of a commercial Neem insecticide (NeemAzalTM-T/S) on early and late developmental stages of the Beet armyworm Spodoptera exiqua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). PJBS 8(4):520–526Google Scholar
- Glazer I, Lewis EE (2000) Bioassays of entomopathogenic nematodes. In: Navon A, Ascher KRS (eds) Bioassays of entomopathogenic microbes and nematodes. CAB International (CABI Publishing), Wallingford 2000, pp. 234Google Scholar
- Leuthardt FLG (2013) Distribution, life history, food choice and chemical ecology of the box-tree pyralid Cydalima perspectalis. Dissertation, University of BaselGoogle Scholar
- Oberdorfer E, Schwabe A, Müller T (2001) Pflanzensoziologische Exkursionsflora für Deutschland und angrenzende Gebiete. Eugen Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
- Schmutterer H, Huber J (2005) Natürliche Schädlingsbekämpfungsmittel. Eugen Ulmer GmbH & Co, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- van Trier H, Hermans D (2007) Buchs. Eugen Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
- Walker F (1859) Part XVIII pyralides—list of specimens of lepidopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum (Vol. 18, pp. 509-798). London: British Museum (Natural History), Department of ZoologyGoogle Scholar