Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing disease resistance of local and international plum cultivars (Prunus domestica) from Eastern Transylvania, Romania

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessments were carried out to evaluate disease susceptibility in two local and three internationally recognised plum cultivars (‘D’Agen’, ‘Stanley’ and ‘Tuleu gras’). The following pathogens were evaluated weekly: plum pox virus (PPV), funguses blackthorn dotty (Polystigma rubrum), red rust (Tranzscheila spp.), shot-hole disease (Stigmina carpophila) and blossom blight (Monilinia laxa). According to the results, one of the local cultivars assessed (Local 2) presented virtually no virus infestation even under high mealy plum aphid (Hyalopterus pruni) density. Therefore, this cultivar can be considered PPV resistant. Local cultivar 1 also presented very low susceptibility to shot hole and blossom blight. Both may be promising genetic sources in breeding programmes against pathogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blazek, J. (2007). A survey of the genetic resources used in plum breeding. Acta Horticulturae, 734, 31–45. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.734.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohačenko, I., Pinkrova, J., Komárková, J., & Paprštein, F. (2010). Selected processing characteristics of new plum cultivars grown in the Czech Republic. Horticultural Science, 37(2), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duric, G., Micic, N., & Lucic, P. (1998). Growth and bearing potential of plum cultivars Stanley and Pozegaca on the two stock/interstock combinations and on Myrobalan. Acta Horticulturae, 478, 225–228. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.478.35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. FAOSTAT. (2015). Retrieved May 31, 2016, from http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor.

  5. Hartmann, W. (2007). New results from plum breeding in Hohenheim. Acta Horticulturae, 734, 187–192. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.734.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacob, H. B. (2002). Breeding of plums, prunes and mirabelles in Geisenheim, Germany: Breeding goals and previous realisation. Acta Horticulturae, 577, 39–43. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.577.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacob, H. B. (2007). Twenty-five years plum breeding in Geisenheim, Germany: Breeding targets and previous realisations. Acta Horticulturae, 734, 341–346. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.734.48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarebica, D. S., & Muratovic, A. S. (1978). Some properties of growth and productivity of plum cultivars in Bosnia. Acta Horticulturae, 74, 125–128. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1978.74.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jelacic, T., Dermic, E., Kazija, D. H., Vujevic, P., Savic, Z., Bisko, A., et al. (2008). Analysis of autochthonous plum genotypes (Prunus Domestica L.) in Croatia for the presence of Plum pox virus. Journal of Plant Pathology, 90, S3–S7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jovancevic, R. (1977). Biological and economic properties of some outstanding prune cultivars grown in the River Valley. Acta Hort, 74, 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kegler, H., Schwarz, S., Fuchs, E., & Gruentzig, M. (2000). Sharka resistant plums and prunes by utilization of hypersensitivity. Acta Horticulturae, 538, 391–395. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.538.69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MacHardy, W.E. (1998). Action thresholdsincrease fungicide and sanitation efficiency in integrated management of apple scab. In Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Plant Pathology.

  13. Milosevic, T. (2000). Bearing potential of standard and selected Pozegaca. Acta Horticulturae, 536, 369–374. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.536.43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Milosevic, T., Zornic, B., & Glisic, I. (2008). A comparison of low-density and high-density plum plantings for differences in establishment and management costs, and in returns over the first three growing seasons: A mini-review. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 83(5), 539–542. doi:10.1080/14620316.2008.11512419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogasanovic, D., Rankovic, M., Plazinic, R., & Papic, V. (1994). Performance of newly-bred Cacak plum cultivars and current breeding tendencies. Acta Horticulturae, 359, 75–81. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.359.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Szecsko, V., Csikos, A., & Hrotko, K. (2002). Timing of hardwood cuttings in the propagation of plum rootstocks. Acta Horticulturae, 577, 115–119. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.577.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Usenik, V., Stampar, F., & Fajt, N. (2007). Pomological and phenological characteristics of some autochthonous Slovenian Plum cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 734, 53–59. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.734.4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful for local people who made the assessments possible. We are also grateful to David Speight at Transenglish for linguistic corrections of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to János Bálint.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bálint, J., Szabó, AK., Tófalvi, B. et al. Comparing disease resistance of local and international plum cultivars (Prunus domestica) from Eastern Transylvania, Romania. J Plant Dis Prot 123, 317–320 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-016-0048-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-016-0048-6

Keywords

Navigation