Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of geostatistical methods for spatiotemporal analysis of drought patterns in East Texas, USA

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drought is one of the most complex and least understood climate-related natural hazards. Active drought mitigation and contingency plan formulation often require a reliable drought distribution map. This study analyzed different spatial interpolation techniques to produce drought distribution map in East Texas, USA. Deterministic [inverse distance weighting (IDW) and spline], and geostatistical [ordinary kriging (Gaussian (KG) and spherical (KS))] interpolation techniques were employed as candidate methods for evaluation. Thirty-four years (1980–2013) of weather station data (N = 47) were used to calculate a 12-month Standardized Precipitation Evaporation Index (SPEI). The dataset was randomly divided into test data (70%, N = 33) and validation data (30%, N = 14). The resulting SPEI maps were cross-checked and validated through a validation dataset by calculating error matrices. The results indicate that KG tends to perform well in relatively drier conditions while IDW shows mixed results, performing well both in dry and wet conditions. The overall power of the four techniques to map 12-month drought conditions resulted in the order of IDW > KG > KS > spline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ali, M. G., Younes, K., Esmaeil, A., & Fatemeh, T. (2011). Assessment of geostatistical methods for spatial analysis of SPI and EDI drought indices. World Applied Sciences Journal, 15, 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1691.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hagman, G. (1984). Prevention better than cure: Report on human and natural disasters in the third world. Stockholm: Swedish Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Palmer, W. C. (1965). Meteorological drought. Research paper no. 45. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce Weather Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mckee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., & Kleist, J. (1993). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology (Vol. 17, pp. 179–183). Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society.

  5. Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Beguería, S., & López-Moreno Juan, I. (2010). A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Journal of Climate, 23, 1696–1718. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alley, W. M. W. (1984). The Palmer drought severity index: Limitations and assumptions. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 23, 1100–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, S. (2010). Drought Indices for the Regional Drought Decision Support System (RDDSS). Memo (External Correspondence). Houston Engineering Inc. File 4875-009 (pp. 1–12).

  8. Guttman, N. B. (1994). On the sensitivity of sample L moments to sample size. Journal of Climate, 7, 1026–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vicente-Serrano, S. M., & Beguería, S. (2015). Comment on ‘Candidate distributions for climatological drought indices (SPI and SPEI)’ by James H. Stagge et al. International Journal of Climatology, 35, 4027–4040. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Shao, M., et al. (2016). Spatiotemporal analysis of multiscalar drought characteristics across the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Hydrology, 534, 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielson-Gammon, J. W. (2012). The 2011 Texas drought. Texas Water Journal, 3, 59–95. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412312.246.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Canadell, J., Jackson, R., Ehleringer, J., et al. (1996). Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia, 108, 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. di Piazza, A., Lo Conti, F., Noto, L. V., et al. (2011). Comparative analysis of different techniques for spatial interpolation of rainfall data to create a serially complete monthly time series of precipitation for Sicily, Italy. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13, 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tait, A., & Woods, R. (2007). Spatial interpolation of daily potential evapotranspiration for New Zealand using a spline model. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8, 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM572.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mariani, M. C., & Basu, K. (2015). Spline interpolation techniques applied to the study of geophysical data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 428, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.02.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jarvis, C. H., & Stuart, N. (2001). A comparison among strategies for interpolating maximum and minimum daily air temperatures. Part II: The interaction between number of guiding variables and the type of interpolation method. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 40, 1075–1084. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1075:ACASFI>2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hooyberghs, J., Mensink, C., Dumont, G., & Fierens, F. (2006). Spatial interpolation of ambient ozone concentrations from sparse monitoring points in Belgium. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 8, 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1039/b612607n.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rhee, J., Carbone, G. J., & Hussey, J. (2008). Drought index mapping at different spatial units. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 9, 1523–1534. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM983.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Saz-Sánchez, M. A., & Cuadrat, J. M. (2003). Comparative analysis of interpolation methods in the middle Ebro Valley (Spain): Application to annual precipitation and temperature. Climate Research, 24, 161–180. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr024161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stagge, J. H., Tallaksen, L. M., Gudmundsson, L., et al. (2015). Candidate distributions for climatological drought indices (SPI and SPEI). International Journal of Climatology, 35, 4027–4040. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bae, S., Lee, S. H., Yoo, S. H., & Kim, T. (2018). Analysis of drought intensity and trends using the modified SPEI in South Korea from 1981 to 2010. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10030327.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yuan, S., Quiring, S. M., & Patil, S. (2016). Spatial and temporal variations in the accuracy of meteorological drought indices. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica, 42, 167. https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.2916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nielsen-Gammon, J. W. (2011). The changing climate of Texas. In J. Schmandt, G. R. North, & J. Clarkson (Eds.), The impact of global warming on Texas (2nd ed., pp. 39–68). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoerling, M., Kumar, A., Dole, R., et al. (2013). Anatomy of an extreme event. Journal of Climate, 26, 2811–2832. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00270.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Subedi, M. R. (2016). Evaluating geospatial distribution of drought, drought-induced tree mortality and biomass loss in east Texas, USA. MS thesis, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX.

  26. Begueria, S., & Vicente-Serrano, S. M. (2013). SPEI: Calculation of the standardised precipitation–evapotranspiration index. R package version 1.6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SPEI. Accessed 17 Jan 2015.

  27. Thornthwaite, C. W. (1948). An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review, 38, 55–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194807000-00007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh, V., Guo, H., & Yu, F. (1993). Parameter estimation for 3-parameter log-logistic distribution (LLD3) by Pome. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 7, 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (1964). Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables.

  30. Plouffe, C. C. F., Robertson, C., & Chandrapala, L. (2015). Comparing interpolation techniques for monthly rainfall mapping using multiple evaluation criteria and auxiliary data sources: A case study of Sri Lanka. Environmental Modelling and Software, 67, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tobler, W. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 462–465. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11.277.620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lark, R. M. (2000). A comparison of some robust estimators of the variogram for use in soil survey. European Journal of Soil Science, 51, 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00280.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, Y., Guo, L., Jiang, Q., et al. (2015). Comparing geospatial techniques to predict SOC stocks. Soil and Tillage Research, 148, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ly, S., Charles, C., & Degré, A. (2011). Geostatistical interpolation of daily rainfall at catchment scale: The use of several variogram models in the Ourthe and Ambleve catchments, Belgium. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 2259–2274. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2259-2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hancock, P. A., & Hutchinson, M. F. (2006). Spatial interpolation of large climate data sets using bivariate thin plate smoothing splines. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21, 1684–1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dirks, K., Hay, J., Stow, C., & Harris, D. (1998). High-resolution studies of rainfall on Norfolk Island. Part II: Interpolation of rainfall data. Journal of Hydrology, 208, 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00155-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mondol, M. A. H., Ara, I., & Das, S. C. (2017). Meteorological drought index mapping in Bangladesh using standardized precipitation index during 1981–2010. Advances in Meteorology, 2017, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4642060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, K., Li, Q., Yang, Y., Zeng, M., Li, P., & Zhang, J. (2015). Analysis of spatio-temporal evolution of droughts in Luanhe River Basin using different drought indices. Water Science and Engineering, 8, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2015.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the NOAA Climate Data Online (CDO) program for providing data for this research. Sincere gratitude is also expressed to the Department of Physics and Geosciences, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, for providing access to the Geospatial Research Laboratory. Dr. W. Xi financially supported this work through his University Research Award, STEP-HG Faculty Research Award, and Research Startup Funds from Texas A&M University-Kingsville.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological and Health Sciences, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, 78363, USA

    Mukti Ram Subedi & Weimin Xi

  2. Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA

    Christopher B. Edgar

  3. Department of Animal, Rangeland, and Wildlife Sciences, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, 78363, USA

    Sandra Rideout-Hanzak

  4. Department of Physics and Geosciences, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, 78363, USA

    Brent C. Hedquist

Authors
  1. Mukti Ram Subedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weimin Xi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher B. Edgar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sandra Rideout-Hanzak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Brent C. Hedquist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mukti Ram Subedi or Weimin Xi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 469 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Subedi, M.R., Xi, W., Edgar, C.B. et al. Assessment of geostatistical methods for spatiotemporal analysis of drought patterns in East Texas, USA. Spat. Inf. Res. 27, 11–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-018-0216-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-018-0216-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation