Curriculum Perspectives

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 85–87 | Cite as

Regenerating curriculum inquiry in Australia: some thoughts on this agenda

Point and counterpoint


  1. Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  2. Green, B. (2018). Engaging curriculum: Bridging the curriculum theory and English education divide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Klohr, P. R. (1980). The curriculum field: Gritty and ragged? Curriculum Perspectives, 1(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  4. Yates, L. (1987). Curriculum Theory and Non-Sexist Education. Unpublished PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
  5. Yates, L. (2016). Europe, transnational curriculum movements and comparative curriculum theorizing. European Education Research Journal, 15(3), 366–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Yates, L. (2018). ‘Making’ and ‘taking’ problems: The curriculum field and Michael Young. In D. Guile, D. Lambert, & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Sociology, curriculum studies and professional knowledge (pp. 169–181). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Curriculum Studies Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations