Skip to main content
Log in

Lautsymbolik in lyrischen Texten – Grenzen und Möglichkeiten

Sound Symbolism and Lyrics – Chances and Limits

  • Laborbeitrag
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel geht der Möglichkeit nach, die subjektiven Lautinterpretationen lyrischer Texte auf eine wissenschaftliche Grundlage zu stellen. Mithilfe aktueller lautsymbolischer Erkenntnisse und Frequenzanalysen lassen sich qualitative Einschätzungen und quantitative Messungen aufeinander abbilden. Dadurch erlauben sie eine objektive Grundlage ästhetischer Eindrücke.

Abstract

This article tries to find a scientific basis for subjective interpretations of sounds in lyrical language. Recent results in the field of sound symbolism in addition to frequency counts may help to reconcile qualitative and quantitative dimensions of textual analysis, so that aesthetic impressions become quantifiable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  • Ahlner, Felix/Zlatev, Jordan: »Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism«. In: Sign Systems Studies 38.1. (2010), S. 298–348.

  • Albers, Sabine: Lautsymbolik in ägyptischen Texten. Mainz 2008.

  • Anderson, Earl R.: A Grammar of Iconism. Madison/London 1998.

  • Aryani, Arash/Jacobs, Arthur M./Conrad, Markus: »Extracting salient sublexical units from written texts: ›Emophon‹, a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity«. In: Frontiers in Psychology 4. Article 654 (2013), S. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aryani, Arash/Kraxenberger, M./Ullrich, S./Jacobs, Arthur M./Conrad, Markus: »Measuring the basic affective tone of poems via phonological saliency and iconicity«. In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 10.2 (2015), S. 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asano, Michiko/Imai, Mutsumi/Kita, Sotaro/Kitajo, Keiichi/Okada, Hiroyuki/Thierry, Guillaume: »Sound symbolism scaffolds language development in preverbal infants«. In: Cortex 63 (2015), S. 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berghe, Christian Louis van den: La Phonostylistique du Français. The Hague/Paris 1976.

  • Bremner, Andrew J./Caparos, Serge/Davidoff, Jules/de Fockert, Jan/Linnell, Karina J./Spence, Charles: »›Bouba‹ and ›kiki‹ in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners«. In: Cognition 126 (2013), S. 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brysbaert, Marc/Buchmeier, Matthias/Conrad, Markus/Jacobs, Arthur M./Bölte, Jens/Böhl, Andrea: »The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German«. In: Experimental Psychology 58.5 (2011), S. 412–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, David: »Phonaesthetically speaking«. In: English Today 42. 11.2 (1995), S. 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Roger: »The fitness of names to drawings. A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika«. In: British Journal of Psychology 52.3 (1961), S. 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsen, Hilke: »Lautsymbolik – ein vernachlässigter Forschungsgegenstand der Sprachwissenschaft«. In: Glottotheory 5.2 (2014), S. 185–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsen, Hilke: »Der Faktor Lautsymbolik«. In: JournaLIPP 4 (2015), S. 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsen, Hilke: Einführung in die Lautsymbolik. Berlin 2016.

  • Ertel, Suitbert: Psychophonetik. Untersuchungen über Lautsymbolik und Motivation. Göttingen 1969.

  • Fimi, Dimitra/Higgins, Andrew: J.R.R. Tolkien. A Secret Vice. Tolkien on Invented Languages. London 2016.

  • Fort, Mathilde/Martin, Alexander/Peperkamp, Sharon: »Consonants are more important than vowels in the bouba-kiki effect«. In: Language and Speech 3 (June 2014), S. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Patrice L.: »Toward an explanation of phonetic symbolism«. In: Word 28.3 (1976), S. 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fónagy, Ivan: »Communication in poetry«. In: Word 17 (1961), S. 194–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fónagy, Ivan: Die Metaphern in der Phonetik. Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des wissenschaftlichen Denkens. The Hague 1963.

  • Fónagy, Ivan: Languages within Languages. An Evolutive Approach. Amsterdam et al. 2001.

  • Hevner, Kate: »An experimental study of the affective value of sounds in poetry«. In: The American Journal of Psychology 49.3 (1937), S. 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Archibald: »Sound-symbolism in lexicon and literature«. In: M. Estellie Smith (Hg.): Studies in Honor of George L. Trager. The Hague/Paris 1972, S. 142–147.

  • Hinton, Leanne/Nichols, Johanna/Ohala, John: Sound Symbolism. Cambridge 1994.

  • Hostetter, Carl: »Tolkienian linguistics: The first fifty years«. In: Tolkien Studies 4 (2007a), S. 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter, Carl: »Elvish as she is spoke«. In: Wayne G. Hammond/Christina Scull (Hg.): The Lord of the Rings 1954–2004. Scholarship in Honor of Richard E. Blackwelder. Milwaukee 2006, S. 231–255.

  • Hostetter, Carl: »Languages invented by Tolkien«. In: Michael Drout (Hg.): J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia – Scholarship and Assessment. New York 2007b, S. 332–344.

  • Hrushovski, Benjamin: »The meaning of sound patterns in poetry. An interaction theory«. In: Poetics Today 2.1a (1980), S. 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, Mutsumi/Kita, Sotaro: »The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution«. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 369. 2013.0298, 2014, S. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, Wolfgang: Gestalt Psychology. An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. New York/Toronto 1929, 61947.

  • Levickij, Viktor V.: »Phonetic symbolism in natural languages«. In: Glottotheory 4.1 (2013), S. 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer, Martin S.: »Physiognomic meanings in the titles of short stories«. In: Colin Martindale: Psychological Approaches to the Study of Literary Narratives. Hamburg 1988, S. 74–95.

  • Mandelker, Amy: Russian formalism and the objective analysis of sound in poetry. In: The Slavic and East European Journal 27.3 (1983), S. 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelker, Amy: New Research in Phonetic Symbolism: The Poetic Context. Ann Arbor 1984.

  • Maurer, Daphne/Pathman, Thanujeni/Mondloch, Catherine J.: »The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults«. In: Developmental Science 9.30 (2006), S. 316–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miall, David S.: »Sounds of contrast: An empirical approach to phonemic iconicity«. In: Poetics 29.1 (2001), S. 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münnich, Udo A.: »Untersuchungen zu Lautwiederholungen in jambischen Pentameterzeilen«. In: Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 22 (1976), S. 35–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Alan/Rendall, Drew: »The sound of round: Evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic takete-maluma phenomenon«. In: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 65.2 (2011), S. 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Alan/Rendall, Drew: »Parsing the role of consonants versus vowels in the classic takete-maluma phenomenon«. In: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 67.2 (2013), S. 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuckolls, Janis B.: »The case for sound symbolism«. In: Annual Review of Anthropology 28 (1999), S. 225–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okrand, Marc: The Klingon Dictionary. English/Klingon. Klingon/English. New York et al 1992.

  • Omniglot: Klingon. www.omniglot.com/conscripts/klingon.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk, Ozge/Krehm, Madelaine/Vouloumanos, Athena: »Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4‑month-olds«. In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114 (2013), S. 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterfalvi, Jean-Michel: »Étude du symbolisme phonétique par l’appariement de mots sans signification à des figures«. In: L’année psychologique 64.2 (1964), S. 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterfalvi, Jean-Michel: »Les recherches expérimentales sur le symbolisme phonétique«. In: L’année psychologique 65.2 (1965), S. 439–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña, Marcela, Mehler, Jacques, Nespor, Marina: »The role of audiovisual processing in early conceptual development«. In: Psychological Science 22.11 (2011), S. 1419–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podhorodecka, Joanna: »Is lámatyáve a linguistic heresy? Iconicity in J. R. R. Tolkien’s invented languages«. In: Elzbieta Tabakowska/Christina Ljungberg/Olga Fischer (Hg.): Insistent Images. Iconicity in Language and Literature 5. Amsterdam et al. 2007, S. 103–110.

  • Priestly, Tom M. S.: »On levels of analysis of sound symbolism in poetry, with an application to Russian poetry«. In: Leanne Hinton/Johanna Nichols/John Ohala (Hg.): Sound Symbolism. Cambridge 1994, S. 237–248.

  • Rausch, Roman: »Sound symbolism in Elvish«. Sindanoorie.net/art/ssymb.html, 2014 (18.05.2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, Edward: »A study in phonetic symbolism«. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology 12 (1929), S. 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara, Kazuko/Kawahara, Shigeto: »A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: The image of size«. In: Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 36. Berkeley. (Paper delivered 2010).

  • Smith, Arden R.: »Invented languages and writing systems«. In: Stuart D. Lee (Hg.): A Companion to J.R.R. Tolkien. Chichester 2014, 202–214.

  • Spector, Ferrinne/Maurer, Daphne: »Early sound symbolism for vowel sounds«. In: i-Perception 4.4 (2013), S. 239–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillner, Bernd: »Grundlagen der Phonostilistik und Phonästhetik«. In: Ders. (Hg.): Methoden der Stilanalyse. Tübingen 1984, S. 69–99.

  • Spillner, Bernd: »Stilistische Phänomene der Schreibung und Lautung«. In: Ulla Fix/Andreas Gardt/Joachim Knape (Hg.): Rhetorik und Stilistik II. Berlin/New York 2009, S. 1545–1562.

  • Stevens, Cj/DeVito, Joseph A./Isaacson, Norman: »Phonetic symbolism and audience perception«. In: The Southern Speech Journal 34.3 (1969), S. 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SUBTLEX-DE: http://crr.ugent.be/archives/534

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesmer, Hermann: Experimentelle euphonische Untersuchungen einzelner Vokale und Silben in der deutschen Sprache. Halle/S. 1933.

  • Thompson, Patrick D./Estes, Zachary: »Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function«. In: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64.12 (2011), S. 2392–2404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, Edward L.: »On Orr’s hypotheses concerning the front and back vowels«. In: The British Journal of Psychology 36.1 (1945), S. 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ultan, Russell: »Size-sound symbolism«. In: Joseph H. Greenberg/Charles A. Ferguson/Edith A. Moravcsik (Hg.): Universals of Human Language II. Phonology. Stanford 1978, S. 525–568.

  • Volke, Stefan: Sprachphysiognomik. Grundlagen einer leibphänomenologischen Beschreibung der Lautwahrnehmung. Freiburg/München 2007.

  • Walker, Peter/Bremner, J. Gavin/Mason, Uschi/Spring, Jo/Mattock, Karen/Slater, Alan/Johnson, Scott P.: »Preverbal infants’ sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences«. In: Psychological Science 21.1 (2010), S. 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, Chris: »Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: Evidence from an interference task«. In: Brain and Language 93 (2005), S. 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whissell, Cynthia: »Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: Evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone«. In: Perceptual and Motor Skills 89 (1999), S. 19–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, Michael/van Peer, Willie: »Roman Jakobsons Konzept der Selbstreferenz aus der Perspektive der heutigen Kognitionswissenschaft«. In: Hendrik Birus/Sebastian Donat/Burkhard Meyer-Sickendiek (Hg.): Roman Jakobsons Gedichtanalysen. Eine Herausforderung an die Philologien. Göttingen 2003, S. 277–306.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilke Elsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elsen, H. Lautsymbolik in lyrischen Texten – Grenzen und Möglichkeiten. Z Literaturwiss Linguistik 47, 549–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41244-017-0077-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41244-017-0077-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation