Evaluation of Soil Nitrate Accumulation under Different Fertigation Regimes and Simulation by the Hydrus-1D Model
- 31 Downloads
Nitrate loss is a major reason for non-point source contamination on agricultural lands. The objective of this study was to assess the Hydrus-1D model for simulation of soil nitrate in different irrigation regimes, including 100 (I1), 85 (I2), and 70 (I3) % of the water requirement for sugarcane and different urea fertilization rates with 150 (N1), 250 (N2), and 350 (N3) kg/ha. Van Genuchten (VG) parameters were estimated by the RETC [Retention Curve Program for Unsaturated Soils] program. According to the results, by reducing the amount of irrigation water, the soil nitrate accumulation from the soil surface to the deep soil increased by 17 and 35% under I2 and I3 treatments compared with I1. Results showed that the Hydrus-1D model had fair potential for predicting the NO3-N accumulation in the soil profile over the sampling period (AE: −1.25 to 0.99, RMSE: 0.96 to 2.50, d: 0.78 to 0.98). The coefficient of determination between the field measured and simulated values in the soil layers at depths of 30, 60, 90 and 120 cm were 0.87, 0.88, 0.74, and 0.52, respectively. To reduce nitrogen losses, fertilizer application rates must be considered based on sugarcane needs and soil hydraulic properties.
KeywordsNitrate Deficit irrigation Soil pollution Hydrus-1D
We are grateful to the Institute for Research and Training on Development and sugarcane industries in Khuzestan, Iran, for performing laboratory analyses of nitrate content in soil samples.
- 3.Bahmani O, Boroomand Nasab S, Behzad M, Naseri AA (2009) Assessment of nitrogen accumulation and movement in soil profile under different irrigation and fertilization regime. Asian J Agric Res 3(2):38–46Google Scholar
- 4.Bocher LW (1995) Tracing the flow of chemicals: how to reduce nitrate and pesticide leaching, turf science, pp 64–67Google Scholar
- 5.Donigian AS Jr (1981) Model predictions vs. field observations: the model validation/testing process. Fate of Chemicals in the Environment 225. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1983-0225.ch008
- 6.FAO (2015) Crop production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 2015Google Scholar
- 20.Sepaskhah AR, Yousefi F (2007) The effects of zeolite application on nitrate and ammonium retention of a loamy soil under saturated conditions. Aust J Soil Res 45:68–373Google Scholar
- 22.Simunek J, Sejna M, Saito H, Sakai M, Van Genuchten MTH (2008) The HYDRUS1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably saturated media version 4.0. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, California, p 315Google Scholar
- 23.Smith J, Smith P, Addiscott T (1996) Quantitative methods to evaluate and compare soil organic matter (SOM) models. In: Powlson DS et al (eds) Evaluation of soil organic matter models. NATO ASI Ser. I, vol 38. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 181–200Google Scholar
- 26.Van Genuchten MT, Leij FJ, Yates SR (1991) The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils. U.S. Salinity Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Services, RiversideGoogle Scholar
- 29.Wang H, Gao J, Li X, Zhang S, Wang HJ (2015) Nitrate accumulation and leaching in surface and ground water based on simulated rainfall experiments. PLoS One 10(8):1–18Google Scholar