Goal programming models for incomplete interval additive reciprocal preference relations with permutations

Abstract

Within the framework of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, the importance of alternatives could be expressed as interval-valued comparison matrices to model some uncertainty experienced by decision makers (DMs). Owing to the complexity of the considered problem and the lack of DMs’ knowledge, the given interval-valued comparison matrix may be incomplete. It is of importance to develop mathematical models for incomplete interval-valued comparison matrices, so that the missing entries can be estimated. In this study, it is considered that a missing value may be one of the bounds of interval-valued entries. Acceptable incomplete interval additive reciprocal preference relations (IARPRs) are redefined and the existing drawback is overcome. By considering the random behavior of decision makers in comparing alternatives, the novel definitions of multiplicative and additive approximate consistency for incomplete IARPRs are introduced. Then, we propose two goal programming models to estimate the missing values of incomplete IARPRs. The permutations of alternatives are incorporated into the proposed mathematical models. It is found that when the permutations of alternatives are different, the estimated preference values could be different. Some numerical results are reported to illustrate the given algorithms for solving decision-making problems with incomplete IARPRs. The observations reveal that the proposed mathematical models can be used to capture the randomness experienced by decision makers in comparing alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alcalá-Fdez J, Porcel C (2008) A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values. Int J Intell Syst 23:155–175

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banaeian N, Mobli H, Fahimnia B, Nielsen IE, Omid M (2018) Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: a case study from the agri-food industry. Comput Oper Res 89:337–347

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carmone FJ, Kara JA, Zanakis SH (1997) A Monte Carlo investigation of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices in AHP. Eur J Oper Res 102:538–555

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen SM, Chen CD (2011) Handling forecasting problems based on high-order fuzzy logical relationships. Expert Syst Appl 38:3857–3864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen SM, Lin TE, Lee LW (2014) Group decision making using incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Inf Sci 259:1–15

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen SM, Munif A, Chen GS, Liu HC, Kuo BC (2012) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights. Expert Syst Appl 39:6320–6334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen SM, Tanuwijaya K (2011) Fuzzy forecasting based on high-order fuzzy logical relationships and automatic clustering techniques. Expert Syst Appl 38:15425–15437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen SM, Wang NY, Pan JS (2009) Forecasting enrollments using automatic clustering techniques and fuzzy logical relationships. Expert Syst Appl 36:11070–11076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2009) Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong YC, Xu JP (2016) Consensus building in group decision making. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fedrizzi M, Giove S (2007) Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization. Eur J Oper Res 183:303–313

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Genç S, Boran FE, Akay D, Xu ZS (2010) Interval multiplicative transitivity for consistency, missing values and priority weights of interval fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 180:4877–4891

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harker PT (1987) Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Math Model 9(11):837–848

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harker PT (1987) Alternative modes of questioning in the analytic hierarchy process. Math Model 9(3–5):353–360

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 37:176–189

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2007) A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(5):863–877

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahraman C (2008) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: theory and applications with recent developments. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khalid A, Beg I (2016) Incomplete interval valued fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 348:15–24

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krejčí J (2017a) On additive consistency of interval fuzzy preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 107:128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krejčí J (2017b) On extension of multiplicative consistency to interval fuzzy preference relations. Oper Res 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0307-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee LW (2012) Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Expert Syst Appl 39:11666–11676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee LW, Chen SM (2015) Fuzzy decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic operators. Inf Sci 294:513–529

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liang Q, Liao XW, Liu JP (2017) A social ties-based approach for group decision-making problems with incomplete additive preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 119:68–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu F (2009) Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160(18):2686–2700

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu F, Pan LH, Liu ZL, Peng YN (2018) On possibility-degree formulae for ranking interval numbers. Soft Comput 22:2557–2565

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu F, Pan LH, Peng YN (2016) A partner-selection method based on interval multiplicative preference relations with approximate consistency. IEEE Int Conf on Fuzzy Syst FUZZ 2016:2235–2240

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liu F, Pedrycz W, Wang ZX, Zhang WG (2017) An axiomatic approach to approximation-consistency of triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 322:1–18

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu F, Pedrycz W, Zhang WG (2017) Limited rationality and its quantification through the interval number judgments with permutations. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(12):4025–4037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu F, Peng YN, Yu Q, Zhao H (2018) A decision-making model based on interval additive reciprocal matrices with additive approximation-consistency. Inf Sci 422:161–176

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu F, Zhang WG (2014) TOPSIS-based consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(8):1283–1394

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu F, Zhang WG, Wang ZX (2012) A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 218:747–754

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu J, Zhang G, Ruan D, Wu F (2007) Multi-objective group decision making: methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY, Ma L (2006) A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157(1):20–33

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Meng FY, Chen XH (2015) An approach to incomplete multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision making. Inf Sci 309:119–137

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Meng FY, Chen XH, Zhang YL (2016) Consistency-based linear programming models for generating the priority vector from interval fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 41:247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Meng FY, Tan CQ, Chen XH (2017) Multiplicative consistency analysis for interval reciprocal preference relations: a comparative study. Omega 68:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Meng FY, An QX, Tan CQ, Chen XH (2017) An approach for group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency and consensus analysis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber Syst 47:2069–2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nakahara Y, Sasaki M, Gen M (1992) On the linear programming problems with interval coefficients. Comput Ind Eng 23(1–4):301–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pape T (2017) Value of agreement in decision analysis: concept, measures and application. Comput Oper Res 80:82–93

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2015) Granular computing and decision-making: interactive and iterative approaches. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  42. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  43. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1987) Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 32(1):107–117

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision-making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12(2):117–131

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Uren̈a MR, Chiclana F, Morente-Molinera JA, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Managing incomplete preference relations in decision making: a review and future trends. Inf Sci 302(1):14–32

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang ZJ (2015) A note on ’a goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making’. Eur J Oper Res 247:867–871

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang HY, Chen SM (2008) Evaluating students’ answerscripts using fuzzy numbers associated with degrees of confidence. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(2):403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang YM, Yang JB, Xu DL (2005) A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets Syst 152(3):475–498

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Xu ZS (2004a) On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference matrices. Fuzzy Opt Decis Mak 3(3):217–225

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Xu ZS (2004b) Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation. Int J Approx Reason 36(3):261–270

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu ZS, Chen J (2008a) Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 184(1):266–280

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Xu ZS, Chen J (2008b) Group decision-making procedure based on incomplete reciprocal relations. Soft Comput 12:515–521

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Xu YJ, Li KW, Wang HM (2014) Incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations and their applications. Comput Ind Eng 67:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu YJ, Patnayakuni R, Wang HM (2013) Logarithmic least squares method to priority for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. Appl Math Model 37:2139–2152

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Xu YJ, Wang HM (2013) Eigenvector method, consistency test and inconsistency repairing for an incomplete fuzzy preference relation. Appl Math Model 37:5171–5183

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang HM (2016) Group decision making based on incomplete multiplicative and fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 48:735–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their thanks to the anonymous referees for the valuable comments and suggestions for improving the paper. The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71571054, 71871072), the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 2016GXNSFFA380004). 2017 Guangxi high school innovation team and outstanding scholars plan, and the Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Eduation (2019).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, M., Liu, F., Peng, Y. et al. Goal programming models for incomplete interval additive reciprocal preference relations with permutations. Granul. Comput. 5, 373–386 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-018-00153-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Incomplete interval additive reciprocal preference relation (incomplete IARPR)
  • Goal programming model
  • Approximate consistency
  • Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
  • Permutation