Advertisement

Stochastic modeling of volume changes in expansive soils

  • Maki Ito
  • Shahid Azam
Technical Note
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Stochastic analysis procedure was developed to predict the probability and range of volume changes in expansive soils. The plastic limit is an appropriate datum for estimating volume changes in the absence of continuous water content data. Results indicated that the soil usually exhibits swelling (30 mm) due to the prevalent dry conditions. The volume changes ranged between − 44 and + 104 mm for the investigated soil. Similarly, the likelihood to have − 30, + 30, and + 60 mm volume change was 5, 50, and 20%, respectively.

Keywords

Expansive soils Volume change Stochastic analysis Water content Swell–shrink curve 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the University of Regina for providing computing facilities.

References

  1. 1.
    Azam S, Chowdhury R (2013) Swell–shrink–consolidation behavior of compacted expansive clays. Int J Geotech Eng 7:424–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azam S, Shah I, Raghunandan M, Ito M (2013) Study on swelling properties of an expansive soil deposit in Saskatchewan, Canada. Bull Eng Geol Env 72:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Briaud J-L, Zang X, Moon S (2003) Shrink test-water content method for shrink and swell predictions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129:590–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chowdhury R, Azam S (2016) Unsaturated shear strength properties of a compacted expansive soil from Regina, Canada. Innov Infrastruct Solut 1:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen PN, Boulfiza M, Sparing B, Sparks GA (2007) Implications of life-cycle cost criteria for the design of structural components: the case of a simple steel-reinforced concrete beam. In: Cho H-N, Frangopol DM, Ang AH-S (eds) Life-cycle cost and performance of civil infrastructure systems. Taylor & Francis Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fredlund DG (1975) Engineering properties of expansive clays. Seminar on Shallow Foundations on Expansive Clays, ReginaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamilton JJ (1969) Effect of environment on the performance of shallow foundations. Can Geotech J 6:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu Y, Chowdhury R, Azam S (2010) Behaviour of expansive soils at a water distribution pipe site. In: Proceedings of 63rd Canadian geotechnical conference, Calgary, AB, Canada, pp 1426–1434Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hu Y, Hubble DW (2005) Failure conditions of asbestos cement water mains in Regina. In: Proceedings of 33rd annual conference of the Canadian society of civil engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu Y, Vu HQ (2011) Analysis of soil conditions and pipe behaviour at a field site. Can Geotech J 48:847–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu Y, Vu HQ, Lotfian K (2008) Instrumentation of asbestos cement pipe in expansive soil. In: American society of civil engineering international pipeline conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 22–24 July, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ito M (2009) Effect of seasonal climate on volume change behaviour of Regina clay. M.Sc. thesis, University of Regina, Regina, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ito M, Azam S (2013) Engineering properties of a vertisolic expansive soil deposit. Eng Geol 152:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ito M, Azam S (2009) Engineering characteristics of a glacio-lacustrine clay deposit in a semi-arid climate. Bull Eng Geol Env 68:551–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ito M, Azam S, Hu Y (2014) A two stage model for moisture-induced deformations in expansive soils. Environ Syst Res 3:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mckeen R, Johnson L (1990) Climate-controlled soil design parameters for mat foundations. J Geotech Eng 116:1073–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Metropolis N, Ulam S (1949) The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc 44:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mitchell PW (1979) The structural analysis of footings on expansive soil. Research report no. 1, Kenneth W. G. Smith and Associates, Adelaide, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Petry TM, Little DN (2002) Review of stabilization of clays and expansive soils in pavements and lightly loaded structures—history, practice, and future. J Mater Civ Eng 14:447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pritchard OG, Hallet SH, Farewell TS (2013) Soil movement in the UK—impacts on critical infrastructure. Infrastructure Transitions Research Consortium, Cranfield University, CranfieldGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pugh RS (2002) Some observations on the influence of recent climate change on the subsidence of shallow foundations. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 155:23–25Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Terzaghi K (1967) Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoshida R, Fredlund D, Hamilton J (1983) The prediction of total heave on a slab-on-grade floor on Regina clay. Can Geotech J 20:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ReginaReginaCanada

Personalised recommendations