International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 363–375 | Cite as

A 3D Analytical Approach for Determining Natural Frequency of Retaining Walls

  • Alireza Darvishpour
  • Ali Ghanbari
  • Seyed Ali A. Hosseini
  • Masoud Nekooei
Research Paper
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

Most of the proposed methods for obtaining the free vibration natural frequency of the retaining wall have been presented, assuming the behavior of the wall in two-dimensional domain, and they are not able to express the three-dimensional behavior of these structures in a satisfying manner. In this paper, the plate theory is employed to analyze the free vibration of wall-soil system in three-dimensional domain. So the retaining wall is modeled as a clamped-free plate and the stiffness of the soil existing behind the wall is modeled as a set of springs. Using the approximate Rayleigh method, new analytical expression for obtaining the free vibration natural frequencies for the three first modes of the wall is represented. The results of the proposed model are compared with both the results of the other researchers and the ones from finite element method (FEM). They are also compared with the results of a full-scale experiment and it shows a good agreement. The comparison shows that modeling the wall in two-dimensional form is not accurate enough to calculate all the natural frequencies of the wall. The results of this paper show that there is a considerable difference between two- and three-dimensional behavior of the walls. The proposed method also gives the free vibration natural frequencies of the wall extensional modes with an acceptable accuracy. Finally, the effect of tensile and compressive behavior of the soil on the fundamental frequency is studied. This research can be considered as a new field in three-dimensional calculation of the retaining walls.

Keywords

Retaining wall Soil–structure interaction Free vibration frequency Mode shapes Three-dimensional analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Wu G (1994) Dynamic soil–structure interaction: pile foundations and retaining structures. University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scott RF (1973) Earthquake-induced earth pressures on retaining walls. In: Proc. of the 5th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wood JH (1973) Earthquake-induced soil pressures on structures, Ph. D. Dissertation. California Institute of Technology, PasadenaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matsuo H, Ohara S (1960) Lateral earth pressure and stability of quay walls during earthquakes. In: Proc. of the 2nd World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yeh CS (1976) Dynamic response of retaining walls during earthquake. In: Proc. International Symposium on Earthquake Structural Engineering, St. Louis, Mo., USA, pp 387–392Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain SK, Scott RF (1989) Seismic analysis of cantilever retaining walls, Transactions of the 10th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. Anaheim, USA, pp 241–246Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hatami K, Bathurst RJ (2000) Effect of structural design on fundamental frequency of reinforced soil retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19(3):137–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghanbari A, Khalilpasha A, Sabermahani M, Heydari B (2013) An analytical technique for estimation of seismic displacements in reinforced slopes based on horizontal slices method (HSM). Geomech Eng 5(2):43–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abbasi O, Ghanbari A, Hosseini SAA (2014) An analyticalmethod for calculating the natural frequency of reinforced retaining walls with soil structure interaction effect. Geosynth Int 21(1):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramezani MS, Ghanbari A, Hosseini SAA (2016) Analytical method for calculating natural frequencies of geosynthetic-reinforced wall with full-height concrete facing. Geosynth Int 24(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghanbari A, Hoomaan E, Mojallal M (2013) An analytycal method for calculating the natural frequency of retaining walls. Int J Civ Eng 11(1):1–9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mojallal M, Ghanbari A (2012) Prediction of seismic displacements in gravity retaining walls based on limit analysis approach. Struct Eng Mech 42(2):247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Varzaghani MI, Ghanbari A (2014) A new analytical model to determine dynamic displacement of foundations adjacent to slope. Geomech Eng 6(6):561–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aminpoor MM, Ghanbari A (2014) Design charts for yield acceleration and seismic displacement of retaining walls with surcharge through limit analysis. Struct Eng Mech 52(6):1225–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davoodi M, Sadjadi M (2015) Assessment of near-field and far-field strong ground motion effects on soil-structure SDOF system. Int J Civ Eng 13(3):153–166Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahgozar M (2015) Accounting for soil nonlinearity in three-dimensional seismic structure-soil-structure-interaction analyses of adjacent tall buildings structures. Int J Civ Eng 13(3 B):213–225Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keshavarz A, Ebrahimi M (2016) The effects of the soil-wall adhesion and friction angle on the active lateral earth pressure of circular retaining walls. Int J Civ Eng 14(2):97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elgamal A, Alampalli S, Laak P (1996) Forced vibration of full-scale wall-backfill system. J Geotech Eng 122(10):849–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rao SS (2007) Vibration of continuous systems. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rayleigh JWS, Lindsay RB (1894) Theory of sound, (vol. 1,2nd Edition). Macmillan and Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warburton GB (1954) The vibration of rectangular plates. In: Proc. of the Institute of Mechanical EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vlassov VZ, Leontiev NN (1960) Beams, plates and shells on an elastic foundation. Fizmatgiz, Moscow (Russian) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Galin LA (1943) On the Winkler-Zimmermann hypothesis for beams. J Prikl Mat Mekh 7(4):293–300 (in Russian) MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vesic AB, Johnson WH (1963) Model studies of beams resting on a silt subgrade. Proceeding of ASCE. J Soil Mech Found 89:1–31Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barden L (1963) The Winkler model and its application to soil. J Struct Eng 41:279–280Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Makris N, Gazetas G (1992) Dynamic pile–soil–pile interaction, Part 11: lateral and seismic response. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 21:145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Richards, Jr R, Huang C, Fishman KL (1999) Seismic earth pressure on retaining structures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125(9):771–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chati M, Rand R, Mukherjee S (1997) Modal analysis of a cracked beam. J Sound Vib 207(2):249–270CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alireza Darvishpour
    • 1
  • Ali Ghanbari
    • 2
  • Seyed Ali A. Hosseini
    • 3
  • Masoud Nekooei
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringKharazmi UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKharazmi UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations