International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 681–693 | Cite as

Seismic Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Under Chloride-Induced Corrosion

  • Mohammadreza Seify Asghshahr
  • Alireza Rahai
Research paper


Chloride-induced corrosion continues to the main cause of deterioration of concrete structures in the marine areas. To introduce the high rate of corrosion in Persian Gulf area, the axial load-carrying capacity of reinforced concrete columns, which have been exposed to the real corrosive condition of this area about 1.5 years, is measured. Then, a new framework for long-term seismic evaluation of existing corroded reinforced concrete bridge in this area is proposed. Calculation of corrosion initiation time, development of material model considering effects of corrosion, moment–curvature analysis of bridge columns, determination of plastic hinge characteristics, and pushover analysis in longitudinal and transverse directions of the bridge are the main steps of proposed framework. Effects of corrosion include the degradation of cover and core concrete, steel bar, and bonding between concrete and steel bar. By comparing the obtained seismic capacity of bridge at specific time points in bridge service life, effect of corrosion on the long-term seismic performance of bridge is determined. On the basis of analysis results, due to ensuring the long-term seismic performance of seismically designed reinforced concrete bridge in the marine area after 90 years of service, it is suggested in this paper that the design base shear should be increased by 12.5%.


Reinforced concrete bridge Chloride-induced corrosion Seismic performance Pushover analysis 


  1. 1.
    Seify Asghshahr MR, Rahai AR, Ashrafi HR (2016) Prediction of chloride content in concrete using ANN and CART. Mag Concr Res 68(21):1085–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rahmani H, Imani Asbagh Y (2016) Corrosion resistance of Montmorillonite-modified dense concretes. Int J Civ Eng. doi: 10.1007/s40999-016-0111-5 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Molina FJ, Alonso C, Andrade C (1993) Cover cracking as a function of rebar corrosion: part 2-numerical model. Mater Struct 26(9):532–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coronelli D, Gambarova P (2004) Structural assessment of corroded reinforced concrete beams: modeling guidelines. J Struct Eng ASCE 130(8):1214–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Enright MP, Frangopol DM (1998) Service-life prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges. J Struct Eng ASCE 124(3):309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee HS, Cho YS (2009) Evaluation of the mechanical properties of steel reinforcement embedded in concrete specimen as a function of the degree of reinforcement corrosion. Int J Frac 157(1–2):81–88CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castel A, Khan I, Gilbert RI (2015) Development length in reinforced concrete structures exposed to steel corrosion: a correction factor for AS3600 provisions. Aust J Struc Eng 16(2):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhargava K, Ghosh AK, Mori Y, Ramanujam S (2008) Suggested empirical models for corrosion-induced bond degradation in reinforced concrete. J Struct Eng ASCE 134(2):221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saberi MR, Rahai AR, Sanayei M, Vogel R (2016) Steel bridge service life prediction using Bootstrap method. Int J Civ Eng. doi: 10.1007/s40999-016-0036-z Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vu KA, Stewart MG (2000) Structural reliability of concrete bridges including improved chloride-induced corrosion models. Struct Saf 22(4):313–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guo T, Sause R, Frangopol DM, Li A (2010) Time-dependent reliability of PSC box-girder bridge considering creep, shrinkage, and corrosion. J Bridge Eng 16(1):29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Firouzi A, Rahai AR (2011) Prediction of extent and likelihood of corrosion-induced cracking in reinforced concrete bridge decks. Int J Civ Eng 9(3):183–192Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martinelli E, Erduran E (2013) Seismic Capacity Design of RC frames and environment-induced degradation of materials: any concern? Eng Struct 52:466–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berto L, Vitaliani R, Saetta A, Simioni P (2009) Seismic assessment of existing RC structures affected by degradation phenomena. Struct Saf 31(4):284–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yalciner H, Sensoy S, Eren O (2012) Time-dependent seismic performance assessment of a single-degree-of-freedom frame subject to corrosion. Eng Fail Anal 19:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumar R, Gardoni P, Sanchez-Silva M (2009) Effect of cumulative seismic damage and corrosion on the life-cycle cost of reinforced concrete bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(7):887–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhong J (2008) Seismic fragility estimates for corroded reinforced concrete bridge structures with two-column bents. PhD dissertation, Texas A&M UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    HARVAT JA (2009) Effect of corrosion on the seismic response of a single-bent, reinforced concrete bridge. MSc thesis, Texas A&M UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghosh J, Padgett JE (2010) Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves. J Struct Eng ASCE 136(12):1497–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guo A, Yuan W, Lan C, Guan X, Li H (2015) Time-dependent seismic demand and fragility of deteriorating bridges for their residual service life. Bull Earthq Eng 13(8):2389–2409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Biondini F, Vergani M (2012) Damage modeling and nonlinear analysis of concrete bridges under corrosion. In sixth international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management (IABMAS 2012), Stresa, Italy, pp 8–12Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ou YC, Fan HD, Nguyen ND (2013) Long-term seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridges under steel reinforcement corrosion due to chloride attack. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42(14):2113–2127Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anoop MB, Rao KB (2016) Performance evaluation of corrosion-affected reinforced concrete bridge girders using Markov chains with fuzzy states. Sādhanā 41(8):887–899Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Altoubat S, Maalej M, Shaikh FUA (2016) Laboratory simulation of corrosion damage in reinforced concrete. Int J Concr Struct Mater 10(3):383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shekarchi M, Moradi F (2007) Concrete durability issues in the Persian Gulf. InCBM-CI international workshop, Karachi, Pakistan, pp 357–370Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ashrafi HR, Ramezanianpour AA (2007) Service life prediction of silica fume concretes. Int J Civ Eng 5(3):182–197Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Choe DE, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D, Haukaas T (2009) Seismic fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges subject to corrosion. Struct Saf 31(4):275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Duracrete (1998) Probabilistic performance based durability design of concrete structures. General guidelines for durability design and redesign, Document BE95-1347/R15Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ghosh J (2013) Parameterized seismic reliability assessment and life-cycle analysis of aging highway bridges. PhD dissertation, Rice UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Arιoglu N, Girgin ZC, Arιoglu E (2006) Evaluation of ratio between splitting tensile strength and compressive strength for concretes up to 120 MPa and its application in strength criterion. ACI Mater J 103(1):18–24Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xia J, Jin WL, Zhao YX, Li LY (2013) Mechanical performance of corroded steel bars in concrete. P I Civ Eng Struct B 166(5):235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fernandez I, Bairán JM, Marí AR (2015) Corrosion effects on the mechanical properties of reinforcing steel bars. Fatigue and σ–ε behavior. Constr Build Mater 101(1):772–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Taha NA, Morsy M (2015) Study of the behavior of corroded steel bar and convenient method of repairing. HBRC J 12(1):107–113Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang WP, Chen H, Gu XL (2015) Tensile behaviour of corroded steel bars under different strain rates. Mag Concr Res 68(3):127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hsu TT (1992) Unified theory of reinforced concrete. CRC press, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mander JB, Priestley MJ, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng ASCE 114(8):1804–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yousaf M, Siddiqi ZA, Sharif MB, Qazi AU (2016) Force-and displacement-controlled non-linear FE analyses of RC beam with partial steel bonded length. Int J Civ Eng. doi: 10.1007/s40999-016-0076-4 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sezen H, Setzler EJ (2008) Reinforcement slip in reinforced concrete columns. ACI Struct J 105(3):280–289Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Aviram A, Mackie KR, Stojadinović B (2008) Guidelines for nonlinear analysis of bridge structures in California. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berekeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sadeghi K (2016) Nonlinear static-oriented pushover analysis of reinforced concrete columns using variable oblique finite-element discretization. Int J Civ Eng. doi: 10.1007/s40999-016-0045-y Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAmirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations