Abstract
Preloading method has been a widely used alternative to improve soft soil in coastal areas in China. In this paper, a field test of PVD-reinforced soft soil with surcharge preloading and vacuum preloading was introduced. Based on the field test, three-dimensional finite-element analyses were conducted to evaluate the performance of reinforced soft soil. The subsoils were simulated as linearly elastic–perfectly plastic materials with Mohr–Coulomb failure criteria. The PVDs were modeled individually as solid elements with the cross section of real PVD. The computed settlements, layered settlements, lateral displacements and excess pore water pressure were compared with the field data. The results show that the differential settlement on the ground can be minimized in the vacuum preloading. However, the environmental influence area of vacuum preloading was greater than that of surcharge preloading outside the reinforced area. The influence depth of vacuum preloading under PVD base was time dependent. And the cut-off wall had a significant effect on mitigating vacuum loss at the boundary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chung SG, Kweon HJ, Jang WY (2014) Observational method for field performance of prefabricated vertical drains. Geotext Geomembr42(4):405–416. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.06.005
Liu JC, Lei GH, Zheng MX (2014) General solutions for consolidation of multilayered soil with a vertical drain system. Geotext Geomembr42(3):267–276. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.04.001
Kim TH, You SH (2015) Settlement analysis considering sand mat induced initial settlement in soft ground improved by PBD. Int J Civ Eng13(2B):146–152
Kjellmann W (1952) Consolidation of clay soil by means of atmospheric pressure. In: Proceedings on soil stabilization conference, Boston, USA, pp 258–263
Indraratna B (2010) Recent advances in the application of vertical drains and vacuum preloading in soft soil stabilization. Austr Geomech J45(2):1–44
Yan SW, Chu J (2003) Soil improvement for a road using a vacuum preloading method. Ground Improv7(4):165–172
Saowapakpiboon J, Bergado DT, Voottipruex P, Lam LG, Nakakuma K (2011) PVD improvement combined with surcharge and vacuum preloading including simulations. Geotext Geomembr29(1):74–82. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.008
Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Balasubramaniam AS, McIntosh G (2012) Soft ground improvement via vertical drains and vacuum assisted preloading. Geotext Geomembr30(2012):16–23. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.01.004
Lam LG, Bergado DT, Hino T (2015) PVD improvement of soft Bangkok clay with and without vacuum preloading using analytical and numerical analyses. Geotext Geomembr43(6):547–557. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.07.013
Chai JC, Rondonuwu SG (2015) Surcharge loading rate for minimizing lateral displacement of PVD improved deposit with vacuum pressure. Geotext Geomembr43(6):558–566. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.07.012
Ya JW, Fang X, Mei Y, Dean S (2016) Ground deformation induced by vacuum loading-unloading. Environ Earth Sci75(3):218. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4915-4
Hibbitt D, Karlsson B, Sorensen P (2006) ABAQUS/standard user’s manual. HKS Inc., Dallas
Holtz RD, Lancellotta R, Jamiolkowski M, Pedroni S (1991) Laboratory testing of prefabricated ‘wick’ drains. In: Proceedings of Geo-Coast’91, Yokohama, Japan, pp 311–316
Miura N, Chai JC (2000) Discharge capacity of prefabricated vertical drains confined in clay. Geosynthet Int7(2):119–135
Rujikiatkamjorn C, Indraratna B, Chu J (2008) 2D and 3D numerical modeling of combined surcharge and vacuum preloading with vertical drains. Int J Geomech8(2):144–156. doi:10.1061/ASCE1532-364120088:2144
Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Sathananthan L (2005) Analytical and numerical solutions for a single vertical drain including the effects of vacuum preloading. Can Geotech J42(4):994–1014. doi:10.1139/t05-029
Chen PS, Fang YG, Mo HH, Zhang GX, Dong ZL (2009) Analysis of 3D FEM for soft foundation improved by vacuum preloading. Chin J Geotech Eng 31(4):564–570(Chinese)
Dong ZL, Chen PS, Mo HH, Zhang GX (2008) Comparison of numerical simulation with finite element method for vacuum preloading. Chin J Rock Mech Eng27(11):2347–2353(Chinese)
Asaoka A (1978) Observational procedure of settlement prediction. Soils Found18(4):87–101
Kabbaj M, Tavenas F, Leroueil S (1988) In situ and laboratory stress-strain relationships. Geotechnique38(1):83–100
Li JS, Sun J (1999) One dimension consolidate-creep problem of Shanghai silt clay. J Tongji Univ27(4):389–392(Chinese)
Chu J, Yan SW (2005) Estimation of degree of consolidation for vacuum preloading projects. Int J Geomech5(2):158–165. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:2(158)
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; Nos. 41272294 and 51508408) for this work. And the corresponding author is obliged to the Pujiang Talents Scheme (No. 15PJ1408800) for the continuous support for his research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ye, GB., Xu, Y. & Zhang, Z. Performance Evaluation of PVD-Reinforced Soft Soil with Surcharge and Vacuum Preloading. Int J Civ Eng 16, 421–433 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0142-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0142-y