Development of a Connector Element for Single-Bolted, Single-Lap Joint Under Flexion–Torsion

  • O. OmranEmail author
  • V.-D. Nguyen
  • H. Jaffal
  • P. Coorevits
Research Paper


In this research, analytical, numerical and experimental methods were used to develop and investigate a connector element for a bolted joint under a tensile load. In the experimental part of the research, various mechanical solicitations (tensile, torsion and shear tests) were applied to steel bolted connections in different configurations having multiple columns and either a single or multiple rows. In the numerical method, to determine the stress and strain distributions due to tensile load forces in specimens, ABAQUS software was used to generate 3D finite element models to compare with our results. However, our analytical solution, which leads to realization of the stiffness matrix under the Rayleigh–Ritz hypothesis, permits us to replace a bolted connection with a simpler connective element and thus to deduce the most intensely loaded zones. Numerical simulation, analytical studies and experimental studies showed coherent results for different configurations, emphasizing the importance of our developed connector for bolted joints. This allows reduction of the time required for calculations.


Connector element Bolted joint Numerical modeling Stiffness matrix Tensile load 



The authors are grateful to the Conseil Régional de Picardie of France for financial support through OSAMM project. We also thank CETIM, industrial partner, for their experimental data.


  1. Baumann E (1982) Finite element analysis of advanced composite structures containing mechanically fastened joints. Nucl Eng Des 70:67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bérot M, Malrieu J, Bay F (2014) An innovative strategy to create equivalent elements for modelling assembly points in joined structures. Eng Comput 31(3):453–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dang Hoang T, Herbelot C, Imad A (2010) Rupture and damage mechanism analysis of a bolted assembly using coupling techniques between AE and DIC. Eng Struct 32:2793–2803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dang Hoang T, Herbelot C, Imad A (2012) On failure mode analysis in a bolted single lap joint under tension-shearing. Eng Fail Anal 24:9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dang Hoang T, Herbelot C, Imad A, Benseddiq N (2013) Numerical modeling for prediction of ductile fracture of bolted structure under tension shear loading. Finite Elem Anal Des 67:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekh J (2006) Multi-fastener single-lap joints in composite structures. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology SE–100 44 Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  7. Ekh J, Schön J (2008) Finite element modeling and optimization of load transfer in multi-fastener joints using structural elements. Compos Struct 82(2):245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ekh J, Schön J, Melin L (2005) Secondary bending in multi fastener, composite-to-aluminium single shear lap joints. Compos B Eng 36(3):195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friberg M (2000) Fastener load distribution and interlaminar stresses in composite laminates. Licentiate thesis, Stockholm: Royal Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  10. Gray PJ, McCarthy CT (2010) A global bolted joint model for finite element analysis of load distributions in multi-bolt composite joints. Compos Part B Eng 41(4):317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gray PJ, McCarthy CT (2011) A highly efficient user-defined finite element for load distribution analysis of large-scale bolted composite structures. Compos Sci Technol 71:1517–1527Google Scholar
  12. Gray PJ, McCarthy CT (2012) An analytical model for the prediction of through-thickness stiffness in tension-loaded composite bolted joints. Compos Struct 94:2450–2459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim TS, Kuwamura H (2007) Finite element modeling of bolted connections in thin-walled stainless steel plates under static shear. Thin Walled Struct 45:407–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Langrand B (1998) Experimental and numerical characterisation of riveted joints dynamically loaded. Thesis, University of Valenciennes and Hainaut CambrésisGoogle Scholar
  15. Langrand B, Deletombe E, Markiewicz E, Drazétic P (1999) Numerical approach for assessment of dynamic strength for rivted joints. Aerosp Sci Technol 3:431–446CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Langrand B, Deletombe E, Markiewicz E, Drazétic P (2001) Riveted joint modeling for numerical analysis of airframe crashworthiness. Finite Elem Anal Des 38:21–44CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Mandal B, Chakrabarti A (2015) A simple homogenization scheme for 3D finite element analysis of composite bolted joints. Compos Struct 120:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCarthy CT, McCarthy MA (2010) A global bolted joint model for finite element analysis of load distributions in multi-bolt composite joints. Compos Part B Eng 41(4):317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson WD, Bunin BL, Hart-Smith LJ (1983) Critical joints in large composite aircraft structure. NASA CR-3710Google Scholar
  20. Omran O (2015) Development of a connector model for bolted-joint. Thesis, University of Picardie Jules VerneGoogle Scholar
  21. Omran O, Nguyen V-D, Jaffal H, Marchand P, Bezza A, Coorevits P (2014) Development of an equivalent numerical model of bolted point based on an analytical solution. In: The ninth international conference on engineering computational technologyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eco-Procédés, Optimisation et Aide à la Décision, (EPROAD EA 4669), IUT de l’AisneUniversité de Picardie Jules VerneSaint-QuentinFrance
  2. 2.CETIM, Pôle ICSSenlisFrance

Personalised recommendations