Nonlinear static procedures are commonly used to compute seismic demands of structural systems. This paper combines the modified capacity spectrum method (MCSM) and modal pushover analysis (MPA) and proposes a new nonlinear static method called MPA–MCSM. To evaluate the accuracy of the proposed method, 30 different buckling-restrained braced (BRB) structures which consist of 3-, 9- and 20-story BRB frames with irregularities in plan and in elevation are selected. Each structure was analyzed subjected to seven pairs of ground motions. As a measure for the performance assessment of the proposed method, four structural seismic demands: (1) peak roof displacement, (2) story drift, (3) story shear and (4) base shear, are computed for each considered structure. The accuracy of MPA–MCSM responses is checked against the results obtained from nonlinear time-history analysis (NL-THA). The results reveal that MPA–MCSM provides conservative seismic demands for BRB frames.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
ATC-40 (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technology Council, California
Balic I, Trogrlic B, Mihanovic A (2017) Simplified multimodal pushover target acceleration method for seismic resistance analysis of medium-rise RC structures. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(1):378–388
Belejo A, Bento R (2016) Improved modal pushover analysis in seismic assessment of asymmetric plan buildings under the influence of one and two horizontal components of ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 87(1):1–15
Cavdar O, Bayraktar A (2015) Nonlinear earthquake performance evaluation of a structure collapsed during the Van, Turkey Earthquake on October 23, 2011. J Perform Constr Facil 30(4):04015092
Chopra AK, Goel RK (2002) A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):561–582
Chopra AK, Goel RK (2004) A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(8):903–927
Dutta SC, Chakroborty S, Raychaudhuri A (2009) Efficacy of pushover analysis methodologies: a critical evaluation. Struct Eng Mech 31(3):265–276
FEMA-355c (2000) State of the art report on systems performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington
FEMA-356 (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington
FEMA-440 (2005) Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington
Ghahari SF, Moradnejad HR, Rouhanimanesh MS, Moghadam AS (2013) Studying higher mode effects on the performance of nonlinear static analysis methods considering near-fault effects. KSCE J Civ Eng 17(2):426–473
Goel RK, Chopra AK (2004) Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: sac buildings. Earthq Spectra 20(1):225–254
Jianmeng M, Changhai Z, Lili X (2008) An improved modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands of structures. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 7(1):25–31
Karavasilis TL, Bazeos N, Beskos DE (2008) Estimation of seismic inelastic deformation demands in plane steel MRF with vertical mass irregularities. Eng Struct 30(11):3265–3275
Kashkooli NA, Banan MR (2012) Effect of frame irregularity on accuracy of modal equivalent nonlinear static seismic analysis. KSCE J Civ Eng 17(5):1064–1072
Keykhosravi A, Aghayari R (2016) Evaluating response modification factor (R) of reinforced concrete frames with chevron brace equipped with steel slit damper. KSCE J Civ Eng 21:1–7
Khoshnoudi HR, Marsono K (2012) Assessment of FEMA356 nonlinear static procedure and modal pushover analysis for seismic evaluation of buildings. Struct Eng Mech 41(2):243–262
Li S, Zuo Z, Zhai C, Xie L (2017) Comparison of static pushover and dynamic analyses using RC building shaking table experiment. Eng Struct 136(1):430–440
Moehle JP, Alarcon LF (1986) Seismic analysis methods for irregular buildings. J Struct Eng 112(1):35–52
Morad B, Sabah M (2015) Comparison between static nonlinear and time history analysis using flexibility-based model for an existing structure and effect of taking into account soil using domain reduction method for a single media. KSCE J Civ Eng 19(3):651–663
NEEShub (2009). http://www.nees.org. Accessed 2009
OpenSees (2006) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. University of California at Berkeley, California
Sangtarash H, Banan MR, Banan MR (2017) Error estimation of nonlinear equivalent static analysis for 3D-BRB frames. KSCE J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0142-8
Shayanfar MA, Ashoory M, Bakhshpoori T, Farhadi B (2013) Optimization of modal load pattern for pushover analysis of building structures. Struct Eng Mech 47(1):119–129
Wood SL (1992) Seismic response of R/C frames with irregular profiles. J Struct Eng 118(2):545–566
About this article
Cite this article
Sangtarash, H., Banan, M.R. & Banan, M.R. Performance Evaluation of a New NSP for Estimation of Seismic Demands of Nonlinear Irregular BRB Frames. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 44, 803–812 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00275-x
- Buckling-restrained braced frames
- Equivalent nonlinear static procedure
- Modal pushover analysis
- Capacity spectrum method
- 3D steel structure