Advertisement

Spatial Demography

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 71–87 | Cite as

Residential Segregation of Foreign Immigrants in Naples

  • Angelo Mazza
  • Giuseppe Gabrielli
  • Salvatore Strozza
Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

Ethnic residential segregation has become a compelling issue in Europe, following from a debate that links segregation with the failure of integrating immigrants into host societies. This paper focus on residential segregation among foreign migrants in the city of Naples. We distinguish among ‘enforced’ and ‘voluntary’ segregation; to this end, we use point pattern analysis to assess the residual clustering of migrant households after having adjusted for economic inhomogeneity within the urban area, noticeably in the cost of rents and in the availability of specific types of jobs. To avoid the risk of confounding the two sources of segregation, a case–control approach in which cases are migrant households and controls are a random sample of native households is introduced. Overall, Eastern European migrants showed no segregation, whereas Chinese reported the highest voluntary segregation. Sri Lankans, Filipinos and Dominicans also showed significant levels of voluntary segregation.

Keywords

Residential segregation Spatial analysis Geographic information systems 

References

  1. Alemani, C. (2004). Le colf: Ansie e desideri delle datrici di lavoro. Polis, 18(1), 137–166.Google Scholar
  2. Almquist, Z. W., & Butts, C. T. (2012). Point process models for household distributions within small areal units. Demographic Research S, 13(22), 593–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammaturo, N., De Filippo, E., & Strozza, S. (2010). La vita degli immigrati a Napoli e nei paesi vesuviani. Franco Angeli: Un’indagine empirica sull’integrazione.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, R. (2013). Teproducing and reshaping ethnic residential segregation in Stockholm: The role of selective migration moves. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 95(2), 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A. (2010). Analysing spatial point patterns in R. Technical report, CSIRO, 2010, version 4. www.csiro.au/resources/pf16h.html.
  6. Baddeley, A., & Turner, R. (2005). spatstat: An R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. Journal of Statistical Software, 12(6), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baddeley, A. J., Møller, J., & Waagepetersen, R. (2000). Non- and semi-parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns. Statistica Neerlandica, 54(3), 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailey, N., van Gent, W. P. C., & Musterd, S. (2017). Remaking urban segregation: Processes of income sorting and neighbourhood change. Population, Space and Place, 23(3), doi: 10.1002/psp.2013.
  9. Baio, G., Blangiardo, G. C., & Blangiardo, M. (2011). Centre sampling technique in foreign migration surveys: A methodological note. Journal of Official Statistics, 27(3), 451–465.Google Scholar
  10. Banerjee, B. (1983). Social networks in the migration process: Empirical evidence on chain migration in India. The Journal of Developing Areas, 17(2), 185–196.Google Scholar
  11. Bartlett, M. (1963). The spectral analysis of point processes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 25(2), 264–296.Google Scholar
  12. Benassi, F., Gabrielli, G., Lipizzi, F., & Strozza, S. (2014). La geografia dei migranti nel napoletano: Fenomeni di segregazione territoriale e implicazioni per le politiche sociali. Urbanistica Informazioni, 257(X), 1–4.Google Scholar
  13. Bettio, F., Simonazzi, A., & Villa, P. (2006). Change in care regimes and female migration: The ‘care drain’ in the Mediterranean. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3), 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bråmå, S. (2008). Dynamics of ethnic residential segregation in Göteborg, Sweden, 1995–2000. Population, Space and Place, 14(2), 101–117. doi: 10.1002/psp.479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, L. A., & Chung, S. Y. (2006). Spatial segregation, segregation indices and the geographical perspective. Population, Space and Place, 12(2), 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cerrone, D. (2007). Le periferie di Napoli. Da area di espansione urbana a luogo di nuove centralità. In National conference, territorial areas and cities in Southern Italy. How many Suburbs? What policies for territorial government (pp. 1–7). Roma Milano: Planum.Google Scholar
  17. Chang, A. (2012). 20th century Chinese migration to Italy: The Chinese diaspora presence within european international migration. History Compass, 10(2), 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, W. A., & Fossett, M. (2008). Understanding the social context of the Schelling segregation model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(11), 4109–4114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coppola, P., & Amato, F. (1998). Petites et grandes villes du Bassin Méditerranéen. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
  20. De Filippo, E., & Strozza, S. (Eds.). (2015). Gli immigrati in Campania negli anni della crisi economica. Condizioni di vita e di lavoro, progetti e possibilità di integrazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli-Ismu.Google Scholar
  21. Diggle, P. (2003). Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Arnold. ISBN 0340740701.Google Scholar
  22. Diggle, P. J., Gómez-Rubio, V., Brown, P. E., Chetwynd, A. G., & Gooding, S. (2007). Second-order analysis of inhomogeneous spatial point processes using case–control data. Biometrics, 63(2), 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review, 20(2), 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frallicciardi, A., Delle Donne, B., & Palmentieri, S. (2010). Napoli metropoli in transizione. Rassegna economica, 2(73), 159–255.Google Scholar
  25. Gelderblom, D., & Adams, W. (2006). The limits and possibilities of migrant networks. In P. Kok, D. Gelderblom, J. O. Oucho, & J. Van Zyl (Eds.), Migration in South and Southern Africa: Dynamics and determinants (pp. 227–248). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  26. Harvey, D. (1966). Geographic processes and the analysis of point patterns: Testing models of diffusion by quadrat sampling. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, XL, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hornziel, I. M. (1990). La condizione degli inmigrati stranieri in Italia. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  28. Johnston, R., et al. (2006). Blacks and Hispanics in urban America: Similar patterns of residential segregation? Population, Space and Place, 12(5), 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalandides, A., & Vaiou, D. (2012). ‘Ethnic’ neighbourhoods? Practices of belonging and claims to the city. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(3), 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar, N. (2007). Spatial sampling design for a demographic and health survey. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(5–6), 581–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar, N., White, M. J., & Singh, G. (2013). Multi-group individual level measures of segregation. SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2205714.
  32. Lee, S. (2011). Metropolitan growth patterns and socio-economic disparity in six US metropolitan areas 1970–2000. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(5), 988–1011.Google Scholar
  33. Ljunggren, J., & Andersen, P. L. (2015). Vertical and horizontal segregation: Spatial class divisions in Oslo, 1970–2003. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(2), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacDonald, J.S., & MacDonald, L. D. (1964). Chain migration ethnic neighborhood formation and social networks. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 42(1): 82–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3348581.
  35. Marcińczak, S., Gentile, M., Rufat, S., & Chelcea, L. (2014). Urban geographies of hesitant transition: Tracing socioeconomic segregation in Post-Ceauşescu Bucharest. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), 1399–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matthews, S., & Parker, D. M. (2013). Progress in spatial demography. Demographic Research, 28(10), 271–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazza, A., & Punzo, A. (2015). On the upward bias of the dissimilarity index and its corrections. Sociological Methods and Research, 44(1), 80–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mazza, A., & Punzo, A. (2016). Spatial attraction in migrants’ settlement patterns in the city of Catania. Demographic Research, 35(5), 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mazza, A., & Punzo, A. (2017). Dealing with omitted answers in a survey on social integration of immigrants in Italy. Mathematical Population Studies, 24(2), 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mingione, E. (2009). Family, welfare and districts. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16(3), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Näre, L. (2010). Sri Lankan men working as cleaners and carers: Negotiating masculinity in Naples. Men and Masculinities, 13(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Näre, L. (2011). The moral economy of domestic and care labour: Migrant workers in Naples, Italy. Sociology, 45(3), 396–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Norwich: Geobooks, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
  44. Östh, J., Clark, W. A. V., & Malmberg, B. (2015). Measuring the scale of segregation using k-nearest neighbor aggregates. Geographical Analysis, 47(1), 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pamuk, A. (2004). Geography of immigrant clusters in global cities: A case study of San Francisco, 2000. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(2), 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phillips, D. (2010). Minority ethnic segregation, integration and citizenship: A European perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(2), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Polverini, F., Principi, A., Balducci, C., Melchiorre, M. G., Quattrini, S., Gianelli, M. V., et al. (2004). EUROFAMCARE, national background report for Italy. Hamburg: University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf.Google Scholar
  48. Quintano, C., Castellano, R., & Rocca, A. (2008). Il degrado delle periferie: Un’analisi del tessuto produttivo nei quartieri della città di Napoli. Rassegna Economica 71(1), 45–73.Google Scholar
  49. R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
  50. Rebelo, E. M. (2012). Work and settlement locations of immigrants: how are they connected? The case of the Oporto metropolitan area. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(3), 312–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strozza, S., Cipriani, A., & Forcellati, L. (2014). Demographic characteristics and behaviours of residents in the neighbourhoods of Naples. Rivista Economica del Mezzogiorno, 28(1–2), 31–68.Google Scholar
  53. Strozza, S., & Ferrara, R. (2007). Vecchi e nuovi volti dell’immigrazione:‘ritratti’per aree di origine e di insediamento. In G. O. Caputo (Ed.), Gli immigrati in Campania. Evoluzione della presenza, inserimento lavorativo e processi di stabilizzazione (pp. 50–92). Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  54. Tacoli, C. (1999). International migration and the restructuring of gender asymmetries: Continuity and change among Filipino labor migrants in Rome. The International Migration Review, 33(3), 658–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tobler, W. R. (1979). Smooth pycnophylactic interpolation for geographical regions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(367), 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tragaki, A., & Rovolis, A. (2014). Immigrant population in Italy during the first decade of the 21st century: Changing demographics and modified settlement patterns. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(3), 286–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van den Berg, L., Drewett, R., Klaasen, L. H., Rossi, A., & Vijverberg, C. H. (1982). Urban Europe: A study of growth and decline. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  58. Vicari, S. (2001). Naples: Urban regeneration and exclusion in the Italian South. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(2), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vicari, S. (2004). La città contemporanea. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  60. Wong, D. (2009). The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). In A. Fotheringham & P. Rogerson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of spatial analysis (pp. 105–123). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze PoliticheUniversità di NapoliNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Economia e ImpresaUniversità di CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations