Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study of microstructure and high-temperature mechanical properties of 15-5 PH stainless steel processed via additive manufacturing and traditional manufacturing

  • Full Research Article
  • Published:
Progress in Additive Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, 15-5 PH Stainless Steel (SS) was produced via an additive manufacturing (AM) technique known as Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS). The microstructure and mechanical properties of the AM alloy were compared with those of a traditionally manufactured (TM) or wrought 15-5 PH SS. Microstructural examination of both materials is performed by optical microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and electron backscatter diffraction in a scanning electron microscope. A distinct difference was observed between the martensitic structure of the AM and TM alloys with the AM material with smaller grain sizes and round-shaped particles. The Vickers microhardness of the AM material was found to be greater than that of the TM material. Tensile testing at 593 °C exhibited a greater strength for the AM material compared to the TM material. Furthermore, the creep rupture life of the AM material was found to be greater compared to the TM material when tested at a temperature 593 °C and applied stress of 211 MPa. Fractographic examination of the crept and tensile specimens was conducted via scanning electron microscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frazier W (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Ramirez DA, Martinez E, Hernandez J, Amato KN, Shindo PW, Medina FR, Wicker RB (2012) Metal fabrication by additive manufacturing using laser and electron beam melting technologies. J Mater Sci Technol 28(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rafi HK, Pal D, Patil N, Starr TL, Stucker B (2014) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of 17-4 precipitation hardenable steel processed by selective laser melting. J Mater Eng Perform 23:4421–4428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fachhini L, Vincente N, Lonardelli I, Magalini E, Robotti P, Molinari A (2010) Metastable austenite in 17–4 precipitation-hardening stainless steel produced by selective laser melting. Adv Eng Mater 12(3):184–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LeBraun T, Nakamoto T, Horikawa K, Kobayashi H (2015) Effect of retained austenite on subsequent thermal processing and resultant mechanical properties of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel. Mater Des 81:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. AlMangour B, Yang J-M (2017) Understanding the deformation behavior of 17-4 precipitate hardenable stainless steel produced by direct metal laser sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spierings AB, Starr TL, Wegener K (2013) Fatigue performance of additive manufactured metallic parts. Rapid Protyp J 19(2):88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rafi HK, Starr TL, Stucker BE (2013) A comparison of tensile, fatigue and fracture behavior of Ti-6Al-4V and 15-5 PH Stainless Steel parts made by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5–8):1299–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchanan C, Matilainen V-P, Salminen A, Gardner L (2017) Structural performance of additive manufactured metallic materials. J Construc Steel Res 136:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee H, Lim CHJ, Low MJ, Tham N, Murukeshan VM, Kim YJ (2017) Lasers in additive manufacturing: a review. Int J Precision Eng Manuf 4(3):307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khaing MW, Fuh JYH, Lu L (2001) Direct metal laser sintering for rapid tooling: processing and characterization of EOS parts. J Mater Process Technol 113:269–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ASM Handbook (1993) Volume 1: properties and selection: irons, steels, and high-performance alloys 1993, ASM International, Materials Park

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deel OL, Mindlin H (1972) Engineering Data on New Aerospace Structural Materials, Technical Report, AFML-TR-71-196

Download references

Acknowledgements

JZ acknowledges the financial support provided by the Walmart Foundation (project title: Optimal Plastic Injection Molding Tooling Design and Production through Advanced Additive Manufacturing).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indrajit Charit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberts, D., Zhang, Y., Charit, I. et al. A comparative study of microstructure and high-temperature mechanical properties of 15-5 PH stainless steel processed via additive manufacturing and traditional manufacturing. Prog Addit Manuf 3, 183–190 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0051-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0051-5

Keywords

Navigation