Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study on Titanium-Reinforced Aluminium Matrix Composites Produced by Melt Infiltration Casting and Squeeze Infiltration

  • Published:
International Journal of Metalcasting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The unresolved production problems including wettability and undesired intermetallic phase formation at the interface of aluminium matrix composites (AMCs) with ceramic reinforcements require a different approach to the subject. Titanium as a reinforcement is a strong candidate to overcome the current problems, without sacrificing beneficial features of conventional AMCs. This study aims to compare microstructural, mechanical and wear properties of bimetal composites manufactured by two different techniques: melt infiltration casting (MIC) and squeeze infiltration (SI). The temperature was set to 730 °C for both production methods. MIC was carried out in an open die with vacuum assistance, while SI was performed in a closed die in an atmospheric environment. Optical microscope, SEM, XRD, EDS, nanoindentation test device and ball-on-disc type tribometer with 3-mm-diameter Al2O3 ball were used for composite characterization. Al, Ti, Si and TiAl3 phases were formed in composite structure for both techniques. Homogeneous and continuous TiAl3 layer was obtained at Al/Ti interfaces. The volume fraction of TiAl3 was 20 times higher in SI than that in MIC due to long interaction time between Al and Ti. The thickness and the hardness of TiAl3 obtained were higher in SI. Abrasive and adhesive wear mechanisms were observed in worn surface examinations. The composite produced by SI showed slightly better performance against wear under the same test conditions. It was exposed to less plastic deformation and abrasive wear than composite produced by MIC. Although initial investment cost was higher, SI appeared to be more advantageous than MIC, considering the applicability in the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.J.S. Chelladurai, R. Arthanari, R. Selvarajan, R. Kanagaraj, P. Angappan, Trans. Indian Inst. Met. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-018-1353-5

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Singh, R.S. Rana, R. Purohit, K. Sahu, Mater. Today Proc. 2, 3697 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Tan, Q. Xin, Z. Li, B.Y. Zong, J. Mater. Sci. 6, 2045 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D.L. Zalensas, Aluminum Casting Technology, 2nd edn. (American Foundry Society, Schaumburg, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Bao, K. Tang, A. Kvithyld, T. Engh, M. Tangstad, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China (English Ed.) 22, 1930 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Hosseini Monazzah, H. Pouraliakbar, R. Bagheri, S.M. Seyed Reihani, Compos. Part B Eng. 125, 49 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Park, J. Lee, I. Jo, S. Cho, S.K. Lee, S.B. Lee, H.J. Ryu, S.H. Hong, Surf. Coat. Technol. 307, 399 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. X.Y. Nie, J.C. Liu, H.X. Li, Q. Du, J.S. Zhang, L.Z. Zhuang, Mater. Des. 63, 142 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S.V. Prasad, R. Asthana, Tribol. Lett. 17, 445 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Gecu, A. Karaaslan, Tribol. Lett. 65, 164 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S.K. Thakur, M. Gupta, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 38, 1010 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Milman, D. Miracle, S. Chugunova, Intermetallics 9, 839 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A.R. Rastkar, P. Parseh, N. Darvishnia, S.M.M. Hadavi, Appl. Surf. Sci. 276, 112 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Djanarthany, J.C. Viala, J. Bouix, Mater. Chem. Phys. 72, 301 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Guo, S. Ni, R. Shen, M. Song, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 639, 269 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Wu, Y. Liu, Z. Xiu, L. Jiang, W. Yang, Rare Met. 29, 98 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Kwon, J. Mondal, K. AloGab, V. Sammelselg, M. Takamichi, A. Kawaski, M. Leparoux, J. Alloys Compd. 698, 807 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.J.S. Chelladurai, R. Arthanari, K. Krishnamoorthy, K.S. Selvaraj, P. Govindan, Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 71, 1 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. B.C. Kandpal, J. Kumar, H. Singh, Mater. Today Proc. 4, 2783 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G.M. Karthik, G.D.J. Ram, R.S. Kottada, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 653, 71 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S.F. Hassan, M. Gupta, Mater. Res. Bull. 37, 377 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J.E. Allison, G.S. Cole, JOM 45, 19 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Loukus, J. Loukus, Int. J. Met. 5, 57 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. G.A. Gegel, D.J. Weiss, Int. J. Met. 1, 57 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Nakae, Y. Hiramoto, Int. J. Met. 5, 23 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.C. Schuster, M. Palm, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 27, 255 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J.D. Lemm, A.R. Warmuth, S.R. Pearson, P.H. Shipway, Tribol. Int. 81, 258 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Li, Y. Lu, H. Zhang, L. Xin, Tribol. Int. 81, 215 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. L. Tang, C. Gao, J. Huang, H. Zhang, W. Chang, Tribol. Int. 66, 165 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Baron, J. Wert, D. Gerard, F. Wawner, J. Mater. Sci. 32, 6435 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. F. Delannay, L. Froyen, A. Deruyttere, J. Mater. Sci. 22, 1 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. F.H. Stott, Tribol. Int. 35, 489 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. N.P. Suh, Wear 25, 111 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Sawla, S. Das, Wear 257, 555 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Yildiz Technical University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Department with the project number of FDK-2017-3241.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ridvan Gecu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gecu, R., Karaaslan, A. A Comparative Study on Titanium-Reinforced Aluminium Matrix Composites Produced by Melt Infiltration Casting and Squeeze Infiltration. Inter Metalcast 13, 311–319 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-018-0253-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-018-0253-0

Keywords

Navigation