Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Our Institutional Experience

  • Ashutosh Gupta
  • Sourabh Nandi
  • Shantanu Tiwari
  • Hitesh Dubey
  • Amit Choraria
  • Vivek Chaudhary
Original Article



To study the outcome, feasibility, morbidity and safety of total radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at our institution.


A total of 50 patients of carcinoma cervix and endometrium according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage were studied. Various patients parameters, i.e. age, weight, BMI and stage of the disease, were noted. Intraoperatively mean operative time and mean blood loss was recorded. Postoperative parameters noted in the present study were lymph node yield, surgical margin and hospital stay. Patients were followed up for a period of 6 months.


Mean age of patients was 54.2 years (range 45–67 years). Thirty-eight patients had carcinoma cervix (24 patients had stage IB1 and 14 patients had stage IA2) and 12 patients were diagnosed to have endometrial carcinoma (eight patients had stage IB and four patients had stage II). Mean operative time recorded was 166 min (range 120–210 min) and average blood loss calculated was 212 ml (range 150–320 ml). These patients did not require any intraoperative blood transfusion. One patient developed colovaginal fistula which was managed later with another surgery. Surgical margins of the specimen were free from tumour infiltration for all patients, and median lymph node yield was 14 (range 10–21). Mean hospital stay was 3 days. All the patients were followed up for 6 months, and all of them were recurrence-free till last follow-up.


Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was found to be effective and safe without compromising oncologic outcome with minimal morbidity in the form of colovaginal fistula in one patient.


Total laparoscopic hysterectomy Pelvic lymphadenectomy Cervix cancer Endometrial cancer 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Webb MJ. Radical hysterectomy. Bailliere’s Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;11(1):149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Canis M, Mage G, Wattiez A, et al. Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1990;19:921.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:864–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ting HC. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a preliminary experience. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;1:536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;9:675–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim DH, Moon JS. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early, invasive cervical carcinoma. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998;5:411–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ostrzenski A. A new laparoscopic abdominal radical hysterectomy: a pilot phase trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996;22:602–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abu-Rustum NR, Gemignani ML, Moore K, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argonbeam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91:402–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, et al. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:588–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malur S, Possover M, Schneider A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:289–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hertel H, Kohler C, Michels W, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:505–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nam JH, Kim JH, Kim DY, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92:277–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee CL, Huang KG. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using Lee-Huang portal and McCartney transvaginal tube. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:536–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor SE, McBee WC, Richard SD, et al. Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2011;15(2):213–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pomel C, Atallah D, Le Bouedec G, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: 8-year experience of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91:534–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramirez PT, Slomovitz BM, Soliman PT, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102(2):252–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gil-Moreno A, Puig O, Pérez-Benavente MA. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(2):113–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leblanc E, Querleu D, Castelain B, et al. Role of laparoscopy in the management of uterine cervix cancer. Cancer Radiother. 2000;4:113–21 (in French).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Benjamin I, Barakat R, Curtin J, et al. Blood transfusion for radical hysterectomy before and after the discovery of transfusion-related human immunodeficiency virus infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:974–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park CT, Lim KT, Chung HW, et al. Clinical evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:49–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Puntambekar SP, Palep RJ, Puntambekar SS, et al. Laparoscopic total radical hyeterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(6):682–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen Y, Xu H, Li Y, et al. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(10):2847–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zakashansky K, Chuang L, Gretz H, et al. A case controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship program. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:1075–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frumovitz M, Dosrets R, Sunn CC, et al. Comparision of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(1):96–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Geetha P, Nair MK. Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review. J Minim Access Surg. 2012;8(3):67–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Gynecologic Oncologists of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Regional Cancer CentreRaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations