Advertisement

Glass Structures & Engineering

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 77–86 | Cite as

Tension–shear interaction domain for EVA-laminated countersunk point-fixing devices

  • Marco Cervio
  • Giovanni Muciaccia
  • Gianpaolo Rosati
Research Paper

Abstract

The present paper aims is to characterize the mechanical behavior of a new embedded point-fixing device for laminated glass for combined tension–shear load cases. This kind of support is based on the principle known as “interlayer junction” in which the anchor is bonded to the interlayer and embedded in the glass panes during the lamination process. The purposes of this innovative point-fixing device are nowadays mainly focused on interior architecture applications: e.g. balustrades, stairs, doors, elevator cars and wells, design furniture, etc., taking advantage of the beautiful aesthetic of an “all-glass” element. This is due to the fact that, contrary to traditional point-fixing bolted connections, the countersunk hole is not passing through the outer glass layer, so that the stainless steel anchor looks like embedded in the glass mass. A comprehensive experimental investigation on the load-bearing capacity under the combined action of tension and shear forces is performed by means of specifically designed test apparatus and procedure. The failure modes in the different direction of load applications are identified and discussed. Finally, in addition to the interaction domain given for combined load cases between tension and shear forces, a simplified analytical interaction expression is also proposed, intended to be used in the practical design applications.

Keywords

Point-fixing devices Laminated embedded fittings Interlayer junctions Interaction domains Glass connections design 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Vetreria F.lli Paci, Seregno (Italy) for the manufacturing of the samples. The cooperation in the tests execution of M. Cucchi and M. Antico from Testing Laboratory for Materials, Buildings and Civil Structures of Politecnico di Milano is also gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bernard, F., Daudeville, L.: Point fixings in annealed and tempered glass structures: modeling and optimization of bolted connections. Eng. Struct. 31, 946–955 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cruz, P.J.S., Carvalho, P.L., Silva, E., Rocha, P.: Embedded point fittings in laminated and double insulating units. In: Louter, C., Bos, F., Belis, J., Lebet, J.-P. (eds.) Proceedings of Challenging Glass 4 and COST Action TU0905 Final Conference. CRC Press, London (2014)Google Scholar
  3. DIN 18008-3: Glass in Building—Design and Construction Rules—Part 3: Point fixed glazing. Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  4. Dispersyn, J., Martens, K., Van Lancker, B., Belis, J.: Experimental investigation of multi-axial loading on adhesive point-fixings. In: Proceedings of Glass Performance Days 2015, pp. 270–274. Tampere (2015)Google Scholar
  5. Dispersyn, J., Santarsiero, M., Belis, J., Louter, C.: A preliminary study of the nonlinearity of adhesive point-fixings in structural glass facades. J. Facade Des. Eng. 2(1–2), 85–107 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. EN 12150-1: Glass in Buildings—Thermally Toughened Soda Lime Silicate Safety Glass—Definition and Description. CEN, Brussels (2015)Google Scholar
  7. EN 1990: Eurocode—Basis of Structural Design. CEN, Brussels (2005)Google Scholar
  8. Hagl, A., Dieterich, O., Wolf, A.T., Sitte, S.: Tensile loading of silicone point supports—revisited. In: Bos, F., Louter, C., Nijsse, R., Veer, F. (eds.) Proceedings of Challenging Glass 3. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2012)Google Scholar
  9. Haldimann, M., Luible, A., Overend, M.: Structural use of glass. IABSE (2008)Google Scholar
  10. Herrmann, T.: Design rules for glass panes fixed by embedded point fittings. In: Proceedings of Glass Processing Days 2005. Tampere (2005)Google Scholar
  11. ISO 12491: Statistical Methods for Quality Control of Building Materials and Components. Geneva (1997)Google Scholar
  12. Maniatis, I.: Numerical and experimental investigation on the stress distribution of bolted connection under in-plane load. Doctoral Dissertation, Technische Universität München (2006)Google Scholar
  13. Puller, K., Sobek, W.: Load-carrying behaviour of metal inserts embedded in laminated glass. In: Bos, F., Louter, C., Nijsse, R., Veer, F. (eds.) Proceedings of Challenging Glass 3. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2012)Google Scholar
  14. Royer-Carfagni, G., Silvestri, M.: Fail-safe point fixing of structural glass. New advances. Eng. Struct. 31, 1661–1676 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Santarsiero, M., Louter, C., Nussbaumer, A.: Laminated connections for structural glass applications under shear loading at different temperatures and strain rates. Constr. Build. Mater. 128, 214–237 (2016a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Santarsiero, M., Louter, C., Nussbaumer, A.: Laminated connections for structural glass components: a full-scale experimental study. Glas. Struct. Eng. 2, 79–101 (2016b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Santarsiero, M., Louter, C., Nussbaumer, A.: The mechanical behaviour of SentryGlas ionomer and TSSA silicon bulk materials at different temperatures and strain rates under uniaxial tensile stress state. Glas. Struct. Eng. 1, 395–415 (2016c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Santarsiero, M., Louter, C., Nussbaumer, A.: Laminated connections for structural glass applications under tensile loading at different temperatures and strain rates. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.09.002
  19. Siebert, G., Pauli, W.R.: New generation of point fixings—architecture and safety aspects. In: Proceedings of Glass Processing Days 2005. Tampere (2005)Google Scholar
  20. Unterweger, R., Beyer, J., Wörner, D., Hilber, R., Bergmeister, K.: A test and design concept for the Fischer FZP-G undercut point fitting for glass panels. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Connections between Steel and Concrete, University of Stuttgart, vol. 2, pp. 827–836. Stuttgart (2007)Google Scholar
  21. Vyzantiadou, M., Avdelas, A.: Point fixed glazing systems: technological and morphological aspects. J. Constr. Steel Res. 60, 1227–1240 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Watson, J., Nielsen, J., Overend, M.: A critical flaw size approach for predicting the strength of bolted glass connections. Eng. Struct. 57, 87–99 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weller, B., Wünsch, J., Härth, K.: Experimental study on different interlayer materials for laminated glass. In: Proceedings of Glass Processing Days 2005. Tampere (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations