Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Clay Content on Soil Stabilization with Alkaline Activation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the role of clay portion in soil used to stabilize soils during alkaline activation with potassium-based alkaline activator. A 10 M potassium hydroxide solution was utilized to activate the soils with and without palm oil fuel ash (POFA) at a solution. Soils with and without POFA mixtures were tested using unconfined compression tests and microstructural analysis (using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction). Comparing the strength of the mixtures with and without POFA, the results presented that short-term compressive strength was higher for mixtures with POFA. However, after longer curing the admixtures of higher kaolinite content with POFA reached significantly higher strength levels than the admixtures without POFA. This work brings new insights to the soil stabilization by alkaline activation providing a relatively new avenue for effective utilization of aluminosilicate source materials with parent-treated soils. The clay minerals of hosted soil play an important role in soil stabilization with alkaline activation that affects the behavior of binder with hosted soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pourakbar S, Asadi A, Huat BB, Fasihnikoutalab MH (2015) Stabilization of clayey soil using ultrafine palm oil fuel ash (POFA) and cement. Transp Geotech 3:24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidovits J (1988) Geopolymer chemistry and properties. In: Davidovits J, Orlinsl EJ (eds) Proceedings of 1st European conference on soft mineralurgy (Geopolymer ‘88). The Geopolymer Institute, Compiegne, France, pp 25–48

  3. Davidovits J (1991) Geopolymers. J Therm Anal Calorim 37(8):1633–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidovits J (1994) Properties of geopolymer cements. In: Proceeding of first international conference on alkaline cements and concretes. Kiev, Ukraine, vol 1, pp 131–149

  5. Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Seth WM, Waltraud MK, Jannie SJVD (2005) Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. Colloids Surf A 269(1):47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elkhebu A, Zainorabidin A, Bakar I, Huat BK, Abdeldjouad L, Dheyab W (2019) Alkaline activation of clayey soil using potassium hydroxide & fly ash. Int J Integr Eng 10(9):99–104

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pourakbar S, Asadi A, Huat BB, Fasihnikoutalab MH (2015) Soil stabilization with alkali-activated agro-waste. Environ Geotech 2(6):359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fasihnikoutalab MH, Asadi A, Unluer C, Huat BK, Ball RJ, Pourakbar S (2017) Utilization of alkali-activated olivine in soil stabilization and the effect of carbonation on unconfined compressive strength and microstructure. J Mater Civ Eng 29(6):601–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alsafi S, Farzadnia N, Asadi A, Huat BK (2017) Collapsibility potential of gypseous soil stabilized with fly ash geopolymer; characterization and assessment. Constr Build Mater 137:390–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu H, Van Deventer J (2000) The geopolymerisation of aluminosilicate minerals. Int J Miner Process 59(3):247–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cristelo N, Glendinning S, Fernandes L, Pinto AT (2013) Effects of alkaline-activated fly ash and Portland cement on soft soil stabilization. Acta Geotech 8(4):395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cristelo N, Glendinning S, Miranda T, Oliveira D, Silva R (2012) Soil stabilization using alkaline activation of fly ash for self-compacting rammed earth construction. Constr Build Mater 36:727–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wallah S, Rangan BV (2006) Low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: long-term properties. In: Res. Report-GC2. Curtin University, Perth, pp 76–80

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ariffin M, Bhutta M, Hussin M, Tahir MM, Aziah N (2013) Sulfuric acid resistance of blended ash geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 43:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cristelo N, Glendinning S, Pinto AT (2011) Deep soft soil improvement by alkaline activation. Proc ICE Ground Improv 164(2):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Habert G, d’Espinose de Lacaillerie JB, Roussel N (2011) An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends. J Clean Prod 19(11):1229–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sargent P, Hughes PN, Rouainia M, White ML (2013) The use of alkali-activated waste binders in enhancing the mechanical properties and durability of soft alluvial soils. Eng Geol 152:96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang M, Guo H, El-Korchi T, Zhang G, Tao M (2013) Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer. Constr Build Mater 47:1468–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sperberga I, Spela P, Rundans M, Cimmers A (2015) Chemically and thermally activated illite clay from latvia. Mater Sci Appl Chem 32:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khale D, Chaudhary R (2007) Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review. J Mater Sci 42(3):729–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Van Deventer JS (2007) The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete’. Cem Concr Res 37(12):1590–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McLellan BC, Williams RP, Lay J, Van Riessen A, Corder GD (2011) Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary Portland cement. J Clean Prod 19(9):1080–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pourakbar S, Asadi A, Huat BB, Cristelo N, Fasihnikoutalab MH (2016) Application of alkali-activated agro-waste reinforced with wollastonite fibers in soil stabilization. J Mater Civ Eng 29:04016206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. British Standards Institution (1990) Methods of test for soils and civil engineering purposes. BS1377, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tkaczewska E (2013) Mechanical properties of cement mortar containing fine-grained fraction of fly ashes. Open J Civ Eng 3(2A):54–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xin M, Zhang L, Ge S, Cheng X (2017) Effects of glass fiber modified with calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H(I)) reinforced cement. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 182:012040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fasihnikoutalab M, Pourakbar S, Ball RJ, Huat BK (2017) The effect of olivine content and curing time on the strength of treated soil in presence of potassium hydroxide. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0089-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) for providing financial assistance and facilities for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lokmane Abdeldjouad.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdeldjouad, L., Asadi, A., Nahazanan, H. et al. Effect of Clay Content on Soil Stabilization with Alkaline Activation. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 5, 4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-019-0157-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-019-0157-y

Keywords

Navigation