Microsimulating Heterogeneous Traffic: An Implementation of the Porous Flow Approach

Original Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Modelling of traffic flow lacking lane-adherence, with variable vehicle sizes and speeds, is a pressing issue in the simulation field. Commercially available software is not designed for modelling such traffic, which is characteristic of developing countries. A recently developed method is to model traffic as grains of sand moving through a porous medium. This approach is explored and expanded in this work to consider multiple vehicle classes and potential uses in microsimulation. A microsimulation model is developed using an object-oriented approach and compared with existing work in the field. The developed approach, found to fit with the porous flow approach, is shown to properly reflect the traffic flow impacts associated with introducing additional vehicle classes. Fundamental flow diagrams are presented for heterogeneous traffic, which fit a Daganzo approximation. It is determined that several changes are required to the theoretical framework to accurately represent traffic characteristics before viable commercial application.

Keywords

Heterogeneous traffic microsimulation Traffic modelling Traffic simulation in developing markets Continuum flow approach 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship. This manuscript has benefitted from the comments made by four anonymous referees on an earlier draft.

References

  1. 1.
    Persula M (1999) Simulation of traffic systems—an overview. J Geogr Inf Decis Anal 3:1–8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arasan VT, Arkatkar SS (2010) Modelling heterogeneous traffic flow on upgrades of intercity roads. Transport 25:129–137.  https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mathew T, Radhakrishnan P (2010) Calibration of microsimulation models for nonlane-based heterogeneous traffic at signalized intersections. J Urban Plan Dev 136:59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:1(59)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bains MS, Ponnu B, Arkatkar SS (2012) Modeling of traffic flow on Indian expressways using simulation technique. In: 8th International conference on traffic and transportation studies. Changsha, China, pp 475–493Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manjunatha P, Vortisch P, Mathew T (2013) Methodology for the calibration of VISSIM in mixed traffic. In: Transportation research board 92nd annual meetingGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siddharth SMP, Ramadurai G (2013) Calibration of VISSIM for Indian heterogeneous traffic conditions. In: 2nd Conference of transportation research group of India, pp 380–389Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mallikarjuna C, Rao KR (2011) Heterogeneous traffic flow modelling: a complete methodology. Transportmetrica 7:321–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nair R, Mahmassani HS, Miller-hooks E (2011) A porous flow approach to modeling heterogeneous traffic in disordered systems. Transp Res Part B 45:1331–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.05.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohan R, Ramadurai G (2013) Heterogeneous traffic flow modelling using macroscopic continuum model. In: 2nd Conference of transportation research group of India, pp 402–411Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arasan VT, Koshy RZ (2005) Methodology for modeling highly heterogeneous traffic flow. J Transp Eng 131:544–551.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:7(544)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malikarjuna C, Rao KR (2010) Cellular automata model for heterogeneous traffic. J Adv Transp 43:321–345.  https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.5670430305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Metkari M, Budhkar A, Maurya AK (2013) Development of simulation model for heterogeneous traffic with no lane discipline. In: 2nd conference of transportation research group of India. pp 360–369Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thankappan A, Tamut Y, Vanajakshi L (2010) Traffic stream modeling under heterogeneous traffic conditions. Traffic Transp Stud.  https://doi.org/10.1061/41123(383)37Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Venkatesan AG, Sivandan R (2009) Development of microscopic simulation model for heterogeneous traffic using objected oriented approach. Transportmetrica 4:227–247.  https://doi.org/10.1080/18128600808685689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Asaithambi G, Venkatesan Kanagaraj B, Tomer Toledo B (2016) Driving behaviors: models and challenges for non-lane based mixed traffic. Transp Dev Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-016-0025-6Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang P, Wong SC, Shu C-W (2005) A weighted essentially non-oscillatory numerical scheme for a multi-class traffic flow model on an inhomogeneous highway. J Comput Phys 212:739–756.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.07.019MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang P, Liu R-X, Wong SC, Dai S-Q (2006) Hyperbolicity and kinematic waves of a class of multi-population partial differential equations. Eur J Appl Math 17:171–200.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S095679250500642XMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang P, Wong SC, Xu Z (2008) A hybrid scheme for solving a multi-class traffic flow model with complex wave breaking. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:3816–3827.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.03.003MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ambarwati L, Pel AJ, Verhaeghe R, Arem B, Van (2014) Empirical analysis of heterogeneous traffic flow and calibration of porous flow model. Transp Res Part C 48:418–436.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mathworks (2016) Delaunay triangulation. https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/delaunay.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2016
  21. 21.
    Chew LP (1989) Constrained Delaunay triangulations and algorithms. Algorithmica 4:97–108MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daganzo C (1992) The cell transmission model. Part I: a simple dynamic representation Of highway traffic. California PATH 28:269–287Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Logghe S, Immers LH (2008) Multi-class kinematic wave theory of traffic flow. 42:523–541.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2007.11.001
  24. 24.
    Farah H, Polus A, Bekhor S, Toledo T (2007) Study of passing gap acceptance behavior using a driving simulator. Adv Transp Stud 23–31Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Minh CC, Sano K, Matsumoto S (2007) Maneuvers of motorcycles at red-lights of signalized intersections. In: 11th World conference on transport researchGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    The Planning Service (1999) Parking standardsGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harley Davidson Motor Cycles (2015) Compare bikes. http://www.harley-davidson.com/content/h-d/en%7B_%7DUS/home/motorcycles/tools/compare-bikes.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2015
  28. 28.
    Vespa USA (2015) Specifications. In: Collection 2015. http://www.vespausa.com/public/upload/Brochure/2015/vespa%7B_%7Drange%7B_%7Dmy15.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2015
  29. 29.
    Geroliminis N, Daganzo CF (2007) Macroscopic modeling of traffic in cities. In: TRB 86th annual meeting, pp 7–413Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations