Advertisement

Inhibiting the Inhibitor: Are Callous-Unemotional Traits Capable of Suppressing the Inhibitory Effect of Child Self-Disclosure on Delinquency?

  • Glenn D. Walters
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

Using a mediation methodology and three waves of data, the current study sought to determine whether callous-unemotional (CU) traits were capable of suppressing the inhibitory effect of child self-disclosure on delinquency in line with predictions from criminal lifestyle theory. The results were then compared to the suppressant effect of low self-control (LSC) on the child self-disclosure–delinquency relationship.

Methods

Participants for this study were 2586 (1290 boys, 1296 girls) members of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth–Child (NLSY-C). CU traits and LSC were measured when participants were 9 to 10 years of age, child self-disclosure was measured when participants were 11 to 12 years of age, and delinquency was measured when participants were 13 to 14 years of age.

Results

Consistent with predictions, the pathway running from CU traits to child self-disclosure to delinquency was significant whereas the pathway running from LSC to child self-disclosure to delinquency was non-significant. Contrary to predictions, the two pathways were not significantly different from one another.

Conclusions

Moderate support was found for the hypothesis that one way CU traits encourage delinquency is by inhibiting the child’s willingness to disclose information to parents. This, in turn, may limit a parent’s knowledge of a child’s friendship networks and routine activities and/or reduce parental monitoring activities.

Keywords

Callous-unemotional traits Perceived parental knowledge Child self-disclosure 

References

  1. 1.
    Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allison, P. D. (2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. In SAS Global Forum 2012 (Paper 312–2012). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bernburg, J. G., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 41, 1287–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breining, S. N., Doyle, J. J., Figlio, D. N., Karbownik, K., & Roth, J. (2017, January). Birth order and delinquency: Evidence from Denmark and Florida (p. 23038). Working Paper No: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Center for Human Resource Research. (2009). NLSY79 user’s guide. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, CHRR NLS User Services.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Karn, C.-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edens, J. F., Skopp, N. A., & Cahill, M. A. (2008). Psychopathic features moderate the relationship between harsh and inconsistent parental discipline and adolescent antisocial behavior. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 472–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elizur, Y., Somech, L. Y., & Vinokur, A. D. (2017). Effects of parent training on callous-unemotional traits, effortful control, and conduct problems: Mediation by parenting. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fanti, K. A., Colins, O. F., Andershed, H., & Sikki, M. (2017). Stability and change in callous-unemotional traits: Longitudinal associations with potential individual and contextual risk and protective factors. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Farley, J. P., & Kim-Spoon, J. (2017). Parenting and adolescent self-regulation mediate between family socioeconomic status and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37, 502–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farrington, D. P., Coid, J. W., Harnett, L., Jolliffe, D., Soteriou, N., Turner, R., & West, D. J. (2006). Criminal careers and life success: New findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development (p. 281). London: Home Office (Research Findings No.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frick, P. J., & White, S. F. (2008). Research review: The importance of callous–unemotional traits for developmental models of aggressive and antisocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Glatz, T., Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2011). Parents’ reactions to youths’ hyperactivity, impulsivity, and attention problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 1125–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greenland, S. (2003). Quantifying biases in causal models: Classical confounding versus collider-stratification bias. Epidemiology, 14, 300–306.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hawes, D. J., & Dadds, M. R. (2005). The treatment of conduct problems in children with callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 737–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hipwell, A. E., Pardini, D., Loeber, R., Sembower, M., Keenan, K., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2007). Callous-unemotional behaviors in young girls: Shared and unique effects. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoeve, M., Stams, G. J. J. M., van der Put, C. E., Dubas, J. S., van der Laan, P. H., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2012). A meta-analysis of attachment to parents and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 771–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kenny, D. A. (2013). Mediation: Sensitivity analysis [webinar]. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/webinars/Mediation/Sensitivity/Sensitivity.html.
  28. 28.
    Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science, 25, 334–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36, 366–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lahey, B. B., Van Hulle, C. A., D’Onofrio, B. M., Rodgers, J. L., & Waldman, I. D. (2008). Is parental knowledge of their adolescent offspring’s whereabouts and peer associations spuriously associated with offspring delinquency? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Laird, R. D., Criss, M. M., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2008). Parents’ monitoring knowledge attenuates the link between antisocial friends and adolescent delinquent behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lykken, D. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    MacKinnon, D. P., Kisbu-Sakarya, Y., & Gottschall, A. C. (2013). Developments in mediation analysis. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (Vol. 2, pp. 338–360). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    McCart, M. R., Priester, P. E., Davies, W. H., & Azen, R. (2006). Differential effectiveness of behavioral parent-training and cognitive-behavioral therapy for antisocial youth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 527–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McCauley, K. L., Shadur, J. M., Hoffman, E. M., MacPherson, L., & Lejuez, C. W. (2016). Adolescent callous-unemotional traits and parental knowledge as predictors of unprotected sex among youth. Behavior Modification, 40, 70–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Muratori, P., Lochman, J. E., Lai, E., Milone, A., Nocentini, A., et al. (2016). Which dimension of parenting predicts the change of callous unemotional traits in children with disruptive behavior disorder? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 69, 202–210.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Muthén, B. (2010). Missing data modeling: Multivariate normality. Mplus Discussion Board [Online forum comment] Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/22/5308.html?1279319060.
  38. 38.
    Muñoz, L. C., Pakalniskiene, V., & Frick, P. J. (2011). Parental monitoring and youth behavior problems: Moderation by callous-unemotional traits over time. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (1998–2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Neumann, A., Barker, E. D., Koot, H. M., & Maughan, B. (2010). The role of contextual risk, impulsivity, and parental knowledge in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 534–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Oxford, M., Cavell, T. A., & Hughes, J. N. (2003). Callous-unemotional traits moderate the relation between ineffective parenting and child externalizing problems: A partial replication and extension. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 32, 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Özdemir, Y., Vazsonyi, A. T., & Çok, F. (2013). Parenting processes and aggression: The role of self-control among Turkish adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 65–77.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Parker, J. S., & Benson, M. J. (2004). Parent-adolescent relations and adolescent functioning: Self-esteem, substance abuse, and delinquency. Adolescence, 39, 519–530.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Peterson, J. L., & Zill, N. (1986). Marital disruption, parent-child relationships, and behavioral problems in children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Peyre, H., Leplége, A., & Coste, J. (2011). Missing data methods for dealing with missing items in quality of life questionnaires: A comparison by simulation of personal mean score, full information maximum likelihood, multiple imputation, and hot deck techniques applied to the SF-36 in the French 2003 decennial health survey. Quality of Life Research, 20, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., Tremblay, R., & Jennings, W. G. (2009). Effects of early family/parent training programs on antisocial behavior and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 83–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., Diamond, B., Farrington, D. P., Tremblay, R. E., et al. (2016). A meta-analysis update on the effects of early family/parent training programs on antisocial behavior and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 229–248.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pituch, K. A., & Stapleton, L. M. (2008). The performance of methods to test upper-level mediation in the presence of nonnormal data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 237–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Posick, C., & Zimmerman, G. M. (2015). Person-in-context: Insights on contextual variation in the victim-offender overlap across schools. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1432–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Poulin, F., & Denault, A.-S. (2012). Other-sex friendships as a mediator between parental monitoring and substance use in girls and boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1488–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 122–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 571–645). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Salekin, R. T. (2017). Research review: What do we know about psychopathic traits in children? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 1180–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Scheepers, F. E., Buitelaar, J. K., & Matthys, W. (2011). Conduct disorder and the specifier callous and unemotional traits in the DSM-5. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Mifflin.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tuvblad, C., Bezdjian, S., Raine, A., & Baker, L. A. (2013). Psychopathic personality and negative parent-to-child affect: A longitudinal cross-lag twin study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ulmer, J. T., & Steffensmeier, D. (2014). The age and crime relationship: Social variation, social explanations. In K. M. Beaver, J. C. Barnes, & B. B. Boutwell (Eds.), The nurture versus biosocial debate in criminology: On the origins of criminal behavior and criminality (pp. 377–396). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Unnever, J. D., Cullen, F. T., & Agnew, R. (2006). Why is “bad” parenting criminogenic? Implications from rival theories. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Walters, G. D. (2016). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects. Justice Quarterly, 33, 1055–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Walters, G. D. (2017a). Animal cruelty and firesetting as behavioral markers of fearlessness and disinhibition: Putting two-thirds of MacDonald’s triad to work. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 28, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Walters, G. D. (2017b). Risk, need, and responsivity in a criminal lifestyle. In F. S. Taxman (Ed.), Handbook on risk and need assessment: Theory and practice (pp. 193–219). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Walters, G. D. (2018a). Child and adolescent maltreatment as a mediator of continuity in callous-unemotional traits and low self-control. Child and Youth Services Review, 84, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Walters, G. D. (2018b). PM effect size estimation for mediation analysis: A cautionary note, alternate strategy, and real data illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Walters, G. D. (2018c). Why are mediation effects so small? Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Walters, G. D. (in press). Unsupervised routine activities as a mediator of the parental knowledge–delinquency relationship. Justice Quarterly. Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Walters, G. D., & Espelage, D. L. (2017). Mediating the bullying victimization-delinquency relationship with anger and cognitive impulsivity: A test of general strain and criminal lifestyle theories. Journal of Criminal Justice, 53, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Walters, G. D., & Espelage, D. L. (in press). Cognitive insensitivity and cognitive impulsivity as mediators of bullying continuity: Extending the psychological inertia construct to bullying behavior. School Psychology Quarterly. Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wootton, J. M., Frick, P. J., Shelton, K. K., & Silverthorn, P. (1997). Ineffective parenting and childhood conduct problems: The moderating role of callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wu, A. D., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Understanding and using mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research, 87, 367–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeKutztown UniversityKutztownUSA

Personalised recommendations