Temporal Consideration of the Marriage Effect

  • David Abeling-Judge



Marriage provides a source of social control away from crime in adulthood, with considerable empirical support from numerous studies elaborating on marriage within various contexts. The effect was initially identified at a time before the modern rise in divorce rates, the deferring of marriage in favor of less formal relationships like cohabitation, and an overall decline in marriage at all, suggesting the need to examine the effect in the context of changing social customs through time.


The current study undertook meta-regression analyses to examine the temporal aspects of the marriage effect, and to demonstrate the importance of systematically studying chronological changes over time within the life course perspective.


While the results do not demonstrate statistically significant temporal changes, the current study expands the discussion of systematically studying chronological change through different methodological strategies.


This study expands methodological and theoretical opportunities to consider the marriage effect and life course research.


Desistance Marriage Life course criminology Socio-cultural context 



This study did not involve any external funding. There are no financial conflicts or requirements regarding this work.


  1. 1.
    Abeling-Judge, D. (2016). Different social influences and desistance from crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 1225–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakken, N. W. (2009). Making it on the outside: gender differences in the desistance process among drug involved offenders. Ann Arbor: University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barnes, J. C., & Beaver, K. M. (2012). Marriage and desistance from crime: a consideration of gene–environment correlation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beaver, K. M., Wright, J. P., DeLisi, M., & Vaughn, M. G. (2008). Desistance from delinquency: the marriage effect revisited and extended. Social Science Research, 37(3), 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beijers, J., Bijleveld, C., & van Poppel, F. (2012). Man’s best possession: period effects in the association between marriage and offending. European Journal of Criminology, 9(4), 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bersani, B., & DiPietro, S. M. (2013). An examination of the “marriage effect” on desistance from crime among US immigrants. D.C.: Washington.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bersani, B., & Van Schellen, M. (2014). The effectiveness of marriage as an “intervention” in the life course: evidence from the Netherlands. In J. A. Humphrey & P. Cordella (Eds.), Effective interventions in the lives of criminal offenders. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bersani, B. E., & DiPietro, S. M. (2014). Examining the salience of marriage to offending for black and Hispanic men. Justice Quarterly, 1–28.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bersani, B. E., & Doherty, E. E. (2013). When the ties that bind unwind: examining the enduring and situational processes of change behind the marriage effect. Criminology, 51(2), 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bersani, B. E., Laub, J. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: do gender and socio-historical context matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blokland, A. A. J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). The effects of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology, 43(4), 1203–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-analysis. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown, S. L., & Bulanda, J. R. (2008). Relationship violence in young adulthood: a comparison of daters, cohabitors, and marrieds. Social Science Research, 37, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Callicott, B., & Vaughn, D. (2005). Google scholar vs. library scholar. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 10(3–4), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cilluffo, A. (2017). Share of married Americans is falling, but they still pay most of the nation's income taxes. Retrieved from
  16. 16.
    Craig, J., & Foster, H. (2013). Desistance in the transition to adulthood: the roles of marriage, military, and gender. Deviant Behavior, 34(3), 208–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Craig, J. M., Diamond, B., & Piquero, A. R. (2014). Marriage as an intervention in the lives of criminal offenders. In J. A. Humphrey & P. Cordella (Eds.), Effective Interventions in the Lives of Criminal Offenders (pp. 19–37). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dannefer, D., & Daub, A. (2009). Extending the interrogation: Life span, life course, and the constitution of human aging. Advances in Life Course Research, 14(1–2), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dannefer, D., & Miklowski, C. (2006). Developments in the life course. In J. A. Vincent, C. Phillipson, & M. Downs (Eds.), The futures of old age. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duncan, G. J., Wilkerson, B., & England, P. (2006). Cleaning up their act: the effects of marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit drug use. Demography, 43(4), 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elder, G. H. (1974). Children of the great depression: social change in life experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Feld, L., & Heckemeyer, J. (2011). FDI and taxation: a meta-study. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(2), 233–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Forrest, W. (2007). Adult family relationships and desistance from crime. Florida State University.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Forrest, W. (2014). Cohabitation, relationship quality, and desistance from crime. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Forrest, W., & Hay, C. (2011). Life-course transitions, self-control and desistance from crime. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(5), 487–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Holland, D. D. (2003). Changes in friendship relations over the life course: implications for desistance from crime. Criminology, 41(2), 293–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Godfrey, B., Cox, D. J., & Farrall, S. (2007). Criminal lives: family life, employment and offending. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johnson, W. L., Giordano, P., Manning, W., & Longmore, M. (2015). The age-IPV curve: changes in intimate partner violence perpetration during adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 44, 708–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kennedy, S., & Ruggles, S. (2014). Breaking up is hard to count: the rise of divorce in the United States, 1980-2010. Demography, 51, 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kerr, D. C. R., Capaldi, D. M., Owen, L. D., Wiesner, M., & Pears, K. C. (2011). Changes in at-risk American men's crime and substance use trajectories following fatherhood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(5), 1101–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    King, R. D., Massoglia, M., & Macmillan, R. (2007). The context of marriage and crime: gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45(1), 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kreager, D. A., Matsueda, R. L., & Erosheva, E. A. (2010). Motherhood and criminal desistance in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Criminology, 48(1), 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Laub, J. H. (2006). Edwin H. Sutherland and the Michael-Adler report: Searching for the soul of criminology seventy years later. Criminology, 44(2), 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63(2), 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology, 31(3), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lipsey, M., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Massoglia, M., & Uggen, C. (2010). Settling down and aging out: toward an interactionist theory of desistance and the transition to adulthood. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 543–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Maume, M. O., Ousey, G. C., & Beaver, K. (2005). Cutting the grass: a reexamination of the link between marital attachment, delinquent peers and desistance from marijuana use. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(1), 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    McGloin, J. M., Sullivan, C. J., Piquero, A. R., Blokland, A., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2011). Marriage and offending specialization: expanding the impact of turning points and the process of desistance. European Journal of Criminology, 8(5), 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    McGloin, J. M., Sullivan, C. J., Piquero, A. R., & Pratt, T. C. (2007). Local life circumstances and offending specialization/versatility. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(3), 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mikki, S. (2010). Comparing Google scholar and ISI web of science for earth sciences. Scientometrics, 82(2), 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rocque, M. (2017). Desistance from crime: new advances in theory and research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sampson, R. J. (2015). Crime and the life course in a changing world: Insights from Chicago and implications for global criminology. Asian Criminology, 10, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41(3), 555–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Savolainen, J. (2009). Work, family and criminal desistance. The British Journal of Criminology, 49, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Seffrin, P. M. (2009). Structural disadvantage, heterosexual relationships and crime: life course consequences of environmental uncertainty. Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Siennick, S., & Osgood, D. W. (2008). A review of research on the impact on crime of transitions to adult roles. In A. M. Liberman (Ed.), The Long View of Crime: A Synthesis of Longitudinal Research (pp. 161–187). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Siennick, S. E., Staff, J, Osgood, D. W., Schulenberg, J. E., Bachman, J. G., & VanEseltine, M. (2014). Partnership transitions and antisocial behavior in young adulthood: a within-person, multi-cohort analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(6), 735–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Simons, R. L., & Barr, A. B. (2014). Shifting perspectives: cognitive changes mediate the impact of romantic relationships on desistance from crime. Justice Quarterly, 31(5), 793–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sorensen, D. W. M. (2003). The effects of intimate partnering and marital failure on criminal behavior: Social causation or self-selection? (3076682 Ph.D.), Rutgers the State University of new Jersey-Newark, Ann Arbor. ProQuest criminal justice database.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Staff, J, Schulenberg, J. E., Maslowsky, J., Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., Maggs, J. L., & Johnston, L. D. (2010). Substance use changes and social role transitions: proximal developmental effects on ongoing trajectories from late adolescence through early adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2012). Meta-regression analysis in economics and business. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Stanley, T. D., & Jarrell, S. B. (1989). Meta-regression analysis: a quantitative method of literature surveys. Journal of Economic Surveys, 3(2), 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sweeten, G., Piquero, A. R., & Steinberg, L. (2013). Age and the explanation of crime, revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(6), 921–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Van Schellen, M. (2012). Marriage and crime over the life course: the criminal careers of convicts and their spouses. The Netherlands: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36(2), 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Williams, R. T. (2012). Using robust standard errors to combine multiple regression estimates with meta-analysis. Loyola University Chicago.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wilson, D. B. (2010). Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and STATA. Retrieved from
  65. 65.
    Zoutewelle-Terovan, M. V., van der Geest, V., Bijleveld, C., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2014). Associations in criminal behaviour for married males and females at high risk of offending. European Journal of Criminology, 11, 340–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Criminology and Criminal Justice Sciences ProgramSchool of Sciences, Barton CollegeWilsonUSA

Personalised recommendations