Advertisement

Understanding the Role of Marriage in Black Women’s Offending Over the Life Course

  • Stephanie M. DiPietro
  • Elaine Eggleston Doherty
  • Bianca E. Bersani
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

Black women remain a traditionally understudied population in life course criminology and in studies of criminal desistance specifically. This work contributes to the desistance literature by focusing on within-group heterogeneity among black women, and examining whether variation in the structural position (measured at both distal and proximate points in the life course) conditions the relationship between a well-recognized correlate of desistance—marriage—and offending.

Methods

The sample of 636 black females is drawn from the Woodlawn project, a longitudinal, interdisciplinary study of social adaptation, psychological well-being, and crime in a Chicago community cohort of black Americans who were in first grade in 1966. To test for potential moderating effects of structural position on the marriage-offending link, we employ hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to simultaneously estimate variation in crime within-individuals while accounting for between-individual differences in offending.

Results

Findings suggest that both childhood and adult measures of structural position condition the marriage-offending link in important ways. Most notably, black women who are more socioeconomically disadvantaged reap greater benefits from marriage—in the form of a reduced probability of offending—than their more advantaged counterparts.

Conclusion

To the degree that women’s pathways to offending are shaped by their socioeconomic marginalization, the practical benefits of marriage (e.g., economic improvement) might surpass other traditionally recognized mechanisms of desistance (e.g., social bonds) in their importance. Future life course research should highlight the complexity of lived experiences by explicitly considering one’s race, gender, and social-structural position.

Keywords

Marriage Desistance African Americans Offending Life course criminology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study uses data from the Woodlawn project, which was designed and executed by Shepphard Kellam and Margaret Ensminger and funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse and other NIH institutes. We are especially grateful to these original researchers, the Woodlawn study participants, Woodlawn Advisory Board, and all of the researchers who have been instrumental in creating and maintaining this rich data set. We thank Shytierra Gaston for her research assistance on this paper and John Laub, Lee Slocum, Kerry Green, and Margaret Ensminger for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Funding

The current research was partially funded by NIDA grant R01 DA033999 and by the Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen, M. L., & Collins, P. H. (2004). Race, class and gender. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baskin, D. R., & Sommers, I. B. (1998). Casualties of community disorder: Women’s careers in violent crime. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benson, M. L., Wooldredge, J., Thistlethwaite, A. B., & Fox, G. L. (2004). The correlation between race and domestic violence is confounded with community context. Social Problems, 51(3), 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bersani, B. E., & DiPietro, S. M. (2013). An examination of the ‘marriage effect’ on desistance from crime among U.S. immigrants. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bersani, B. E., & DiPietro, S. M. (2016). Examining the salience of marriage to offending for black and Hispanic men. Justice Quarterly, 33(3), 510–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bersani, B. E., & Doherty, E. E. (2018). Desistance from offending in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Criminology, in press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blackman, L. C., Clayton, O., Glenn, N., Malone-Colon, L., & Roberts, A. (2005). The consequences of marriage for African Americans: a comprehensive literature review. New York: The Institute for American Values.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brennan, T., Breitenbach, M., Dieterich, W., Salisbury, E. J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2012). Women’s pathways to serious and habitual crime: a person-centered analysis incorporating gender responsive factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(11), 1481–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Broidy, L. M., Stewart, A. L., Thompson, C. M., Chrzanowski, A., Allard, T., & Dennison, S. M. (2015). Life course offending pathways across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(2), 118–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burgess-Proctor A. 2006. Intersections of race, class, gender, and crime: future directions for feminist criminology. Feminist Criminology, 1:27–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burton, L. M., Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Merriwether-de Vries, C. (1994). Context and surrogate parenting among contemporary grandparents. Marriage and Family Review, 20(3–4), 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Calverley, A. 2012. Cultures of desistance: rehabilitation, reintegration and ethnic minorities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Catalano, S., Smith, E., Snyder, H., & Rand, M. (2009). Female victims of violence. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/fvv.pdf.
  16. 16.
    Council for Community Services in Metropolitan Chicago. (1975). Community analysis project. Report no. 1: Chicago problem analysis. Chicago: Council for Community Services in Metropolitan Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Craig, J. M. (2015). The effects of marriage and parenthood on offending levels over time among juvenile offenders across race and ethnicity. Journal of Crime and Justice, 38(2), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Craig, J. M., Diamond, B., & Piquero, A. R. (2014). Marriage as an intervention in the lives of criminal offenders. In Effective interventions in the lives of criminal offenders (pp. 19–37). Springer.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daly, K. (1992). Women’s pathways to felony court: feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 2, 11.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Doherty, E. E., & Bersani, B. E. (2016). Understanding the mechanisms of desistance at the intersection of race, gender, and neighborhood context. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(5), 681–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Doherty, E. E., & Ensminger, M. E. (2013). Marriage and offending among a cohort of disadvantaged African Americans. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(1), 104–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doherty, E. E., & Ensminger, M. E. (2014). Do the adult criminal careers of African Americans fit the ‘facts’? Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. J. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eggleston, E., Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2004). Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elder, G. H. (1985). Perspectives on the life course. In Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968–1980 (pp. 23–49). Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Elman, C., & O’Rand, A. (2004). The race is to the swift: socioeconomic origins, adult education, and wage attainment. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 123–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fader, J. J., & Traylor, L. T. (2015). Dealing with difference in desistance theory: the promise of intersectionality for new avenues of inquiry. Sociology Compass, 9(4), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (2000). Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 10(2), 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giordano, P. C. (2010). Legacies of crime: a follow-up of the children of highly delinquent girls and boys. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Giordano, P. C., Longmore, M. A., Schroeder, R. D., & Seffrin, P. M. (2008). A life-course perspective on spirituality and desistance from crime. Criminology, 46(1), 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Griffin, M. L., & Armstrong, G. S. (2003). The effect of local life circumstances on female probationers’ offending. Justice Quarterly, 20(2), 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guerino, P., Harrison, P. M., and Sabol, W. J. 2011. Prisoners in 2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hahn, B. A. (1993). Marital status and women’s health: the effect of economic marital acquisitions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(2), 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hampton, R., Carillo, R., & Kim, J. (1998). Violence in communities of color. In R. Carrillo & J. Tello (Eds.), Family violence and men of color: healing the wounded male spirit (pp. 1–30). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Harris, K. M. (1997). Teen mothers and the revolving welfare door. PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Harris, K. M., Lee, H., & DeLeone, F. Y. (2010). Marriage and health in the transition to adulthood: evidence for African Americans in the Add Health Study. Journal of Family Issues, 31(8), 1106–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Heimer, K. (1995). Gender, race, and the pathways to delinquency: an interactionist explanation. Crime and Inequality, 140–173.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Heimer, K. (2000). Changes in the gender gap in crime and women’s economic marginalization. Criminal Justice, 1, 427–483.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M. D., & Morash, M. (2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 3(2), 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Horwitz, A. V., & White, H. R. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: a study of a young adult cohort. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jennings, W. G., Piquero, A. R., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: a review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(1), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Johnson, K. R., & Loscocco, K. (2015). Black marriage through the prism of gender, race, and class. Journal of Black Studies, 46(2), 142–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kellam, S. G., Branch, J. D., Agrawal, K. C., & Ensminger, M. E. (1975). Mental health and going to school: the Woodlawn program of assessment, early intervention, and evaluation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    King, R. D., Massoglia, M., & Macmillan, R. (2007). The context of marriage and crime: gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45(1), 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kreager, D. A., Matsueda, R. L., & Erosheva, E. A. (2010). Motherhood and criminal desistance in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Criminology, 48(1), 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., Phillips, M. D., Thornberry, T. P., & Bell, K. A. (2013). Explaining systematic bias in self-reported measures: factors that affect the under- and over-reporting of self-reported arrests. Justice Quarterly, 30(3), 501–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lane, S. D. (2004). Marriage promotion and missing men: African American women in a demographic double bind. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 18(4), 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Laub, J. H., & McDermott, M. (1985). An analysis of serious crime by young black women. Criminology, 23(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology, 31(3), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Laub, J. H., Rowan Z. R., & Sampson, R. J. (2018). The status of the age-graded theory of informal social control. In The Oxford handbook on developmental and life-course criminology (In press) Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Leverentz, A. (2006). The love of a good man? Romantic relationships as a source of support or hindrance for female ex-offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(4), 459–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Leverentz, A. (2014). The ex-prisoner’s dilemma: How women negotiate competing narratives of reentry and desistance. Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lichter, D. T., Anderson, R. N., & Hayward, M. D. (1995). Marriage markets and marital choice. Journal of Family Issues, 16(4), 412–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lichter, D. T., Graefe, D. R., & Brown, J. B. (2003). Is marriage a panacea? Union formation among economically-disadvantaged unwed mothers. Social Problems, 50(1), 60–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lillard, L. A., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Til death do us part: marital disruption and mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1131–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Liu, H., & Reczek, C. (2012). Cohabitation and US adult mortality: an examination by gender and race. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(4), 794–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Martinson, K., & Halcomb, P. (2007). Innovative approach and programs for low-income families. Washington: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Massoglia, M., & Uggen, C. (2007). Subjective desistance and the transition to adulthood. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(1), 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    McLanahan, S. S. (1983). Family structure and stress: a longitudinal comparison of two-parent and female-headed families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Miller, J., & Mullins, C. W. (2006). Feminist theories of crime. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking Stock: The status of criminological theory (Vol. 15, pp. 313–333). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). The continuing importance of men’s economic position in marriage formation. In L. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson, & A. Thornton (Eds.), The ties that bind: perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 283–301). NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Osgood, D. W., & Lee, H. (1993). Leisure activities, age, and adult roles across the lifespan. Society and Leisure, 16(1), 181–208.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Piquero, A. R., & Brame, R. (2008). Assessing the race-/ethnicity-crime relationship in a sample of serious adolescent delinquents. Crime & Delinquency, 54(3), 390–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Piquero, A. R., MacDonald, J. M., & Parker, K. F. (2002). Race, local life circumstances, and criminal activity. Social Science Quarterly, 83(3), 654–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Potter, H. (2006). An argument for black feminist criminology: understanding African American women’s experiences with intimate partner abuse using an integrated approach. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 106–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Potter, H. (2015). Intersectionality and criminology: Disrupting and revolutionizing studies of crime. Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (Second ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2002). Social capital among women offenders examining the distribution of social networks and resources. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Rennison, C., & Planty, M. (2003). Nonlethal intimate partner violence: examining race, gender, and income patterns. Violence and Victims, 18(4), 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rodermond, E., Kruttschnitt, C., Slotboom, A., & Bijleveld, C. (2015). Female desistance: a review of the literature. European Journal of Criminology, 13(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(1), 258–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. L., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Simons, R. L., Lin, K. H., Gordon, L. C., Conger, R. D., & Lorenz, F. O. (1999). Explaining the higher incidence of adjustment problems among children of divorce compared with those in two-parent families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 1020–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Simons, R. L., Stewart, E. A., Gordon, L. C., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (2002). A test of life-course explanations for stability and change in antisocial behavior from adolescence to young adulthood. Criminology, 40(2), 401–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Simpson, S. S. (1991). Caste, class, and violent crime: explaining difference in female offending. Criminology, 29(1), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Simpson, S. S., & Elis, L. (1995). Doing gender: sorting out the caste and crime conundrum. Criminology, 33(1), 47–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Simpson, S. S., & Gibbs, C. (2006). Making sense of intersections: does quantitative analysis enlighten or obfuscate? In K. Heimer & C. Kruttschnitt (Eds.), Gender and crime: new directions in the study of gender, offending, and victimization. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Skinner, K. B., Bahr, S. J., Crane, D. R., & Call, V. R. A. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, and remarriage: a comparison of relationship quality over time. Journal of Family Issues, 23(1), 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Steffensmeier, D. J., & Allan, E. A. (1988). Sex disparities in arrests by residence, race, and age: an assessment of the gender convergence/crime hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 5(1), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Comparison of self-report and official data for measuring crime. In J. V. Pepper & C. V. Petrie (Eds.), Measurement problems in criminal justice research: workshop summary (pp. 43–94). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Labor force statistics from the current population survey: income-to-poverty ratio. Available at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/incpovhlth/2012/index.html.
  88. 88.
    U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Current Population Survey 2011. Annual social and economic supplement. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/apsd/techdoc/cps/cpsmar11.pdf.
  89. 89.
    Unnever, J. D., & Gabbidon, S. (2011). A theory of African American offending: race, racism, and crime. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Van Schellen, M., Apel, R., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2012). ‘Because you’re mine, I walk the line’? Marriage, spousal criminality, and criminal offending over the life course. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(4), 701–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36(2), 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    West, C. M. (2004). Black women and intimate partner violence new directions for research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1487–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Williams, K., & Umberson, D. (2004). Marital status, marital transitions, and health: a gendered life course perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Wilson, J. Q. (2002). The marriage problem: how our culture has weakened families. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Wyse, J. J. B., Harding, D. J., & Morenoff, J. D. (2014). Romantic relationships and criminal desistance: pathways and processes. Sociological Forum, 29(2), 365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of Missouri – St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations