Advertisement

Objective Evaluation of Cervical Dystonia Using an Inertial Sensor-Based System

  • Jonghyun Park
  • Kyung Yong Yang
  • Joonnyong Lee
  • Kibum Youn
  • Jehee Lee
  • Sun Gun Chung
  • Hee Chan Kim
  • Keewon Kim
Original Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Cervical dystonia (CD) is a chronic neurological movement disorder that causes involuntary neck muscle contractions, leading to abnormal movements or posture of the head. However, objective evaluation of severity of CD is lacking in the clinical practice. This study aimed to provide an objective evaluation of the severity of CD based on three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of the neck using wearable inertial sensors. Each inertial sensor was attached to the anterior chest and head of eight patients with idiopathic CD. The involuntary movements of neck were quantified by the rotation angle (RA) and magnitude of angular velocity (MAV) through axis-angle representation expressing 3D rotation. The characteristic posture of each patient was visualized. Four kinematic parameters, the mean and peak values of RA and MAV (Meanangle, Peakangle, Meanvel, and Peakvel) were calculated and correlation between each parameter values and the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) scores from all patients was analyzed to assess clinical validity. The test–retest reliability of the parameters was examined as well. Correlation coefficients of the Meanangle and Peakangle with TWSTRS were 0.28 and 0.69, respectively, whereas those of the Meanvel and Peakvel were 0.84 and 0.84, respectively. The MAV parameters showed a higher correlation with clinical severity than RA parameters. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the four parameters between the test–retest were more than 0.9. We conclude that objective evaluation of severity of CD based on kinematic parameters is clinically valid and has test–retest reliability.

Keywords

Cervical dystonia Inertial sensor Objective evaluation Euler angle Axis-angle Kinematics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation funded by the Korean government (MEST) (NRF-2016M3A9F1941984).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Chan, J., Brin, M. F., & Fahn, S. (1991). Idiopathic cervical dystonia: clinical characteristics. Movement Disorders, 6(2), 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Costa, J., Espírito-Santo, C., Borges, A. A., Ferreira, J., Coelho, M. M., Moore, P., et al. (2005). Botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia. The Cochrane Databases Systemic Review, 25(1), CD003633.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tousignant, M., de Bellefeuille, L., O’donoughue, S., & Grahovac, S. (2000). Criterion validity of the cervical range of motion (CROM) goniometer for cervical flexion and extension. Spine, 25(3), 324–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jost, W. H., Hefter, H., Stenner, A., & Reichel, G. (2013). Rating scales for cervical dystonia: a critical evaluation of tools for outcome assessment of botulinum toxin therapy. J Neural Transm (Vienna), 120(3), 487–496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-012-0887-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Beyl, D. Z., & Salvia, P. (2009). Neck movement speed in cervical dystonia. Movement Disorders, 24(15), 2267–2271.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galardi, G., Micera, S., Carpaneto, J., Scolari, S., Gambini, M., & Dario, P. (2003). Automated assessment of cervical dystonia. Movement Disorders, 18(11), 1358–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Brien, C., Brashear, A., Cullis, P., Truong, D., Molho, E., Jenkins, S., et al. (2001). Cervical dystonia severity scale reliability study. Movement Disorders, 16(6), 1086–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carpaneto, J., Micera, S., Galardi, G., Micheli, A., Carboncini, M. C., Rossi, B., et al. (2004). A protocol for the assessment of 3D movements of the head in persons with cervical dystonia. Clinical Biomechanics, 19(7), 659–663.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zetterberg, L., Halvorsen, K., Farnstrand, C., Lundstrom, E., Lindmark, B., & Aquilonius, S. M. (2005). Objective assessment of cervical dystonia: a pilot study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 112(4), 248–253.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00472.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jahanshahi, M. (2000). Factors that ameliorate or aggravate spasmodic torticollis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 68(2), 227–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patel, S., Lorincz, K., Hughes, R., Huggins, N., Growdon, J., Standaert, D., et al. (2009). Monitoring motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson’s disease using wearable sensors. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 13(6), 864–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoon, C., Lee, J., Kim, K., Kim, H. C., & Chung, S. G. (2015). Quantification of lumbar stability during wall plank-and-roll activity using inertial sensors. PM R, 7(8), 803–813.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Song, Y. S., Yang, K. Y., Youn, K., Yoon, C., Yeom, J., Hwang, H., et al. (2016). Validation of attitude and heading reference system and microsoft kinect for continuous measurement of cervical range of motion compared to the optical motion capture system. Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 40(4), 568–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tarsy, D. (1997). Comparison of clinical rating scales in treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxin. Movement Disorders, 12(1), 100–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gregori, B., Agostino, R., Bologna, M., Dinapoli, L., Colosimo, C., Accornero, N., et al. (2008). Fast voluntary neck movements in patients with cervical dystonia: a kinematic study before and after therapy with botulinum toxin type A. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(2), 273–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herz, E., & Glaser, G. H. (1949). Spasmodic torticollis: II. Clinical evaluation. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tibbetts, R. (1971). Spasmodic torticollis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 15(4), 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Taiwanese Society of Biomedical Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Program of BioengineeringSeoul National University Graduate SchoolSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of MedicineSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.School of Computer Science and EngineeringSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of MedicineSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations