Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Immunocompromising Therapy on In Vivo Cell Survival in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Replacing soft tissue after trauma or tumor surgery remains a major challenge in reconstructive surgery. A promising alternative is the possibility of using bioartificial musculoskeletal tissue created out of primary muscle cells. However, poor survival of transplanted cells and suboptimal matrix qualities limit the development of bioartificial tissues (BATs). Furthermore, granulocyte infiltration into BATs also appears to impair cell survival. Therefore, this study investigates how immunocompromising therapy affects the survival of transplanted myoblasts in a three-dimensional vascularized BAT. Myoblasts (4 × 106) were transfected with a luciferase-reporter sequence and then transplanted into an in vivo bioreactor placed within the abdominal wall of Wistar rats. Bioluminescence was used to monitor the myoblasts in vivo. The rats were either not treated (group 1, control) or subjected to immunocompromising therapy that involved daily administration of cyclosporine A (group 2), prednisolone (group 3), or both (group 4). Bioluminescence monitoring showed that luminescence signals on day 7 were significantly higher in all immunocompromised animals than those in the animals in the control group (group 2: p < 0.0001; group 3: p = 0.0073; group 4: p = 0.0053). Moreover, TUNEL analysis revealed that the apoptosis rate was significantly lower in the cyclosporine-A-treated group than that in the control group (p = 0.037). Our results indicate that cyclosporine A and prednisolone enhance the in vivo survival of transplanted myoblasts and thus they can be considered as a supportive medical treatment for increasing cell survival after cell transplantation in tissue engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lineaweaver, W. C. (2009). Flaps and reconstructive surgery. London: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mooney, D. J., & Mikos, A. G. (1999). Growing new organs. Scientific American, 280, 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koning, M., Harmsen, M. C., van Luyn, M. J., & Werker, P. M. (2009). Current opportunities and challenges in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 3, 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nomi, M., Atala, A., Coppi, P. D., & Soker, S. (2002). Principals of neovascularization for tissue engineering. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 23, 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Novosel, E. C., Kleinhans, C., & Kluger, P. J. (2011). Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 63, 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Erol, O. O., & Spira, M. (1980). New capillary bed formation with a surgically constructed arteriovenous fistula. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 66, 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka, Y., Sung, K. C., Tsutsumi, A., Ohba, S., Ueda, K., & Morrison, W. A. (2003). Tissue engineering skin flaps: Which vascular carrier, arteriovenous shunt loop or arteriovenous bundle, has more potential for angiogenesis and tissue regeneration? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 112, 1636–1644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bach, A. D., Arkudas, A., Tjiawi, J., Polykandriotis, E., Kneser, U., Horch, R. E., & Beier, J. P. (2006). A new approach to tissue engineering of vascularized skeletal muscle. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 10, 716–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunda, S. E., Schriever, T., Rosen, C., Opländer, C., Tolba, R. H., Diamantouros, S., et al. (2012). A new approach of in vivo musculoskeletal tissue engineering using the epigastric artery as central core vessel of a 3-dimensional construct. Plastic Surgery International. doi:10.1155/2012/510852.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bini, A., Itoh, B. J., Kudryk, H., & Nagase, H. (1996). Degradation of cross-linked fibrin by matrix metalloproteinase 3 (stromelysin 1): hydrolysis of the gamma Gly 404-Ala 405 peptide bond. Biochemistry, 35, 13056–13063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McGrath, A. M., Brohlin, M., Kingham, P. J., Novikov, L. N., Wiberg, M., & Novikova, L. N. (2012). Fibrin conduit supplemented with human mesenchymal stem cells and immunosuppressive treatment enhances regeneration after peripheral nerve injury. Neuroscience Letters, 516, 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kofidis, T., Lebl, D. R., Swijnenburg, R. J., Greeve, J. M., Klima, U., & Robbins, R. C. (2006). Allopurinol/uricase and ibuprofen enhance engraftment of cardiomyocyte-enriched human embryonic stem cells and improve cardiac function following myocardial injury. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 29, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, F., Lineaweaver, W. C., Kao, S., Tonken, H., Degnan, K., Newlin, L., & Buncke, H. J. (1993). Microvascular transfer of the rectus abdominis muscle and myocutaneous flap in rats. Microsurgery, 14, 420–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Greer, L. F. III, & Szalay, A. A. (2002). Imaging of light emission from the expression of luciferases in living cells and organisms: A review. Luminescence, 17, 43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sato, A., Klaunberg, B., & Tolwani, R. (2004). In vivo bioluminescence imaging. Comparative Medicine, 54, 631–634.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Labat-Moleur, F., Guillermet, C., Lorimier, P., Robert, C., Lantuejoul, S., Brambilla, E., & Negoescu, A. (1998). TUNEL apoptotic cell detection in tissue sections: Critical evaluation and improvement. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 46, 327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gotthardt, D. N., Bruns, H., Weiss, H. H., & Schemmer, P. (2014). Current strategies for immunosuppression following liver transplantation. Langenbecks Archives of Surgery, 399(8), 981–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khalifian, S., Brazio, P. S., Mohan, R., Shaffer, C., Brandacher, G., Barth, R. N., & Rodriguez, E. D. (2014). Facial transplantation: The first 9 years. Lancet, 384, 2153–2163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ibarra, A., Hernandez, E., Lomeli, J., Pineda, D., Buenrostro, M., Martinon, S., et al. (2007). Cyclosporin-A enhances non-functional axonal growing after complete spinal cord transection. Brain Research, 1149, 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gillon, R. S., Cui, Q., Dunlop, A. R., & Harvey, A. R. (2003). Effects of immunosuppression on regrowth of adult rat retinal ganglion cell axons into peripheral nerve allografts. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 74, 524–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ho, S., Clipstone, N., Timmermann, L., Northrop, J., Graef, I., Florentino, D., et al. (1996). The mechanism of action of cyclosporin A and FK506. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 80, S40–S45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sosa, I., Reyes, O., & Kuffler, D. P. (2005). Immunosuppressants: Neuroprotection and promoting neurological recovery following peripheral nerve and spinal cord lesions. Experimental Neurology, 195, 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Merlini, L., Angelin, A., Tiepolo, T., Braghetta, P., Sabatelli, P., Zamparelli, A., et al. (2008). Cyclosporine A corrects mitochondrial dysfunction and muscle apoptosis in patients with collagen VI myopathies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 5225–5229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsushima, Y., & Baba, T. (1990). The in vivo effect of cyclosporine A on macrophages. Journal of Experimental Pathology, 5, 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Emilie, D., & Etienne, S. (1990). Glucocorticoids: Mode of action and pharmacokinetics. La Revue du praticien, 40, 511–517.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Janssen, P. M., Murray, J. D., Schill, K. E., Rastogi, N., Schultz, E. J., Tran, T., et al. (2014). Prednisolone attenuates improvement of cardiac and skeletal contractile function and histopathology by lisinopril and spironolactone in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS ONE, 9, e88360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Braun, S., Tranchant, C., Vilquin, J. T., Labouret, P., Warter, J. M., & Poindron, P. (1989). Stimulating effects of prednisolone on acetylcholine receptor expression and myogenesis in primary culture of newborn rat muscle cells. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 92, 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rossi, C. A., Pozzobon, M., & De Coppi, P. (2010). Advances in musculoskeletal tissue engineering: Moving towards therapy. Organogenesis, 6, 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The psPAX2 and pMD2.G plasmids were kindly provided by Didier Trono (LVG-Trono Lab, Lausanne, Switzerland), and the lentiviral vector pEMW-Luc was provided by Gan Shu Uin (Department of Surgery, NUS, Singapore). We thank Andrea Fritz and Martina Tappe for technical assistance and tissue embedding, processing, and staining.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian E. Dunda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunda, S.E., Krings, L.K., Ranker, M.F. et al. Effect of Immunocompromising Therapy on In Vivo Cell Survival in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 35, 134–141 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-015-0017-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-015-0017-8

Keywords

Navigation