Skip to main content
Log in

Tensions in the triangle: monetary plurality between institutional integration, competition and complementarity

  • Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This text aims at accounting for the plurality of money by emphasizing the delicate and evolving balance of the legal monetary systems and the continued existence of moneys that stay outside, though their continuation is subjected to chronic difficulties. It uses Polanyian concepts to take the wide and increasing variety of money into account and mobilizes criteria able to analyse the variety of links between them. It proposes a framework based on the representation of a “plurality triangle” with institutional integration, complementarity and competition, and it analyses the positioning of moneys in this framework as well as tensions that may generate shifts in their positioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this text, ‘modern money’ shall mean money in modern societies, that is, societies where a market principle of circulation of wealth dominates, as opposed to ‘exotic societies’, meaning ancient, archaic or primitive societies.

  2. Fungibility appears as an element for defining money within a substantive approach: Polanyi characterizes the quantifiable objects that constitute money as ‘fungibles’ (Polanyi, 1977, p. 102). For primitive and archaic societies, it must be understood that this consubstantial fungibility of money is confined to a given class of quantifiable objects whose uses are compartmentalized and are not all purpose.

References

  • Aglietta M (2002) Whence and Whither Money? The Future of Money. OECD, Paris, pp 31–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Aglietta M, Orléan A (2002) La monnaie entre violence et confiance. Odile Jacob, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Alary P, Blanc J, Desmedt L, Théret B (eds) (2016) Théories françaises de la monnaie: une anthologie. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato M, Fantacci L (2012) The end of finance. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc J (2000) Les monnaies parallèles: unité et diversité du fait monétaire. L’Harmattan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc J (2009) Usages de L’argent et Pratiques Monétaires. In: Steiner P, Vatin F (eds) Traité de Sociologie Économique. PUF, Paris, pp 649–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc J (2011) Classifying ‘CCs’: community, complementary and local currencies’ types and generations. Int J Community Curr Res 15(D):4–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc J (2013) Penser la pluralité des monnaies à partir de Polanyi: un essai de typologie. In: Hillenkamp I, Laville J-L (eds) Socioéconomie et démocratie: l’actualité de Karl Polanyi. Érès, Toulouse, pp 241–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc J (2017) Unpacking Monetary Complementarity and Competition: a Conceptual Framework. Camb J Econ 41(1):239–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc J (2018) Making sense of the plurality of money: a polanyian attempt. In: Gómez G (ed) Monetary plurality around the world: theory and practice. Routledge

  • Blanc J, Desmedt L, Le Maux L, Marques-Pereira J, Ould-Ahmed P, Théret B (2018) Monetary plurality in economic theory. In: Gómez G (ed) Monetary plurality around the world: theory and practice. Routledge

  • Block F (2008) Polanyi’s double movement and the reconstruction of critical theory, Revue interventions économiques. Papers in political economy 38

  • Boyer-Xambeu M-T, Deleplace G, Gillard L (1994) Private money and public currencies: the 16th century challenge. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen BJ (1998) The geography of money. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (N.Y.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons JR (1990) Institutional economics: its place in political economy, vol 2. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen T, Kroszner R (1987) The development of the New Monetary Economics. Journal of Political Economy 95(3):567–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degens P (2016) Between ‘market’ and ‘reciprocity’. How businesses use local currencies, Behemoth. J Civilis 9(2):22–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Dincer NN, Eichengreen B (2014) Central Bank Transparency and Independence: updates and New Measures. Int J Cent Bank 10:189–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantacci L (2005) Complementary currencies: a prospect on money from a retrospect on premodern practices. Financ His Rev 12(1):43–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantacci L (2008) The dual currency system of Renaissance Europe. Financ His Rev 15(1):55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske AP (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychol Rev 99(4):689–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JK (1975) Money: Whence it came, where it went. Penguin books, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Girton L, Roper D (1981) Theory and implications of currency substitution. J Money Credit Bank 13(1):12–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez G (ed) (2018) Monetary plurality around the world: theory and practice. Routledge

  • Grahl J (2000) Money as sovereignty: the economics of Michel Aglietta. New Politic Econ 5(2):291–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco Jr TH (1994) New Money for Healthy Communities. Greco Publishing, Tucson, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield RL, Yeager LB (1983) A laisser-faire approach to monetary stability. J Money Credit Bank 15(3):302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1978) Denationalisation of money: the argument refined. Institute of Economic Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillenkamp I (2013) Le Principe de Householding Aujourd’hui Discussion Théorique et Approche Empirique Par L’économie Populaire. In: Hillenkamp I, Laville J-L (eds) Socioéconomie et Démocratie: L’actualité de Karl Polanyi. Erès, Toulouse, pp 215–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda A (2008a) What is the complementarity among monies? An introductory note. Financ Hist Rev 15(1):7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda A (2008b) Concurrent but non-integrable currency circuits: complementary relationships among monies in modern China and other regions. Financ Hist Rev 15(1):17–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland FE, Prescott EC (1977) Rules Rather than Discretion: the Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. J Politic Econ 85(3):473–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lietaer B (2001) The future of money, creating new wealth, work and a wiser world. Century, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietaer B, Arnsperger C, Goerner S, Brunnhuber S (2012) Money and sustainability: the missing link. Triarchy Press, Axminster

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer B (2016) Re-Risking in realtime. on possible futures for finance after the blockchain, Behemoth. J Civilis 9(2):82–96

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon RI (1973) Money and capital in economic development. The Brookings Institution, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • North P (2010) Local money: how to make it happen in your community. Transition Books, Totnes

    Google Scholar 

  • Onken W (1997) Modellversuche mit sozialpflichtigem Bodem und Geld. Fachverlag für Sozialökonomie, Lütjenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi K (1944) The Great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi K (1957) The Economy as Instituted Process. In: Polanyi Karl, Arensberg Conrad M, Pearson Harry W (eds) Trade and Market in the Early Empires. Economies in History and Theory. The Free Press, Collier-Macmillan Ltd, New York, London, pp 243–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi K (1968) Primitive, archaic, and modern economies: essays. George Dalton (ed). Anchor Books, Garden City

  • Polanyi K (1977) The livelihood of man. In: Pearson HW (ed) Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London

  • Ponsot J-F (2003) The obsession of credibility: a historical perspective on full dollarization and currency boards. Int J Politic Econ 33(1):83–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rösl G (2006) Regional currencies in Germany. Local competition for the Euro?. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiag H (2014) Towards a neo-Polanyian approach to money: integrating the concept of debt. Econ Soc 43(4):559–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servet JM (1988) La Monnaie Contre l’État Ou La Fable Du Troc. In: Kahn P (ed) Droit et Monnaie. États et Espace Monétaire Transnational. Cahier Du Credimi, 14. Litec, Paris, pp 49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Servet JM (1993) L’institution monétaire de la société selon Karl Polanyi. Revue Écon 44(6):1127–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Servet JM (2013) Le principe de réciprocité. Un concept polanyien pour comprendre et construire l’économie solidaire. In: Isabelle H, Laville J-L (eds) Socioéconomie et Démocratie: L’actualité de Karl Polanyi. Erès, Toulouse, pp 187–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang G, Longhurst N (2013) Desperately seeking niches: grassroots innovations and niche development in the community currency field. Global Environ Chang 23(5):881–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon LD (1996) Rethinking our centralized monetary system: the case for a system of local currencies. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Théret B (ed) (2007) La monnaie dévoilée par ses crises. 2 vols. Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Théret B (2011) Du keynésianisme au libertarianisme. La place de la monnaie dans les transformations du savoir économique autorisé. Revue de la régulation. Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs. 10

  • von Mises L (1971) The theory of money and credit. The Foundation for economic education, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jérôme Blanc.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This paper draws on earlier work on the plurality of money (notably Blanc, 2000, 2011, 2013, 2017, 2018). It notably follows the paper published in Gómez (2018) and intends to provide an evolutionary conception of monetary plurality. I am grateful to many commentators who helped me improve these attempts.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blanc, J. Tensions in the triangle: monetary plurality between institutional integration, competition and complementarity. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 15, 389–411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-018-0101-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-018-0101-1

Keywords

JEL codes

Navigation