Science China Materials

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 435–436 | Cite as

Biotechnology smart control over stem cell fate commitment at nanoscale

Highlights
  • 79 Downloads

References

  1. 1.
    Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Oreffo ROC. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin–matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nat Mater, 2014, 13: 558–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen CS. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science, 1997, 276: 1425–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McMurray RJ, Gadegaard N, Tsimbouri PM, et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat Mater, 2011, 10: 637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Das RK, Gocheva V, Hammink R, et al. Stress-stiffening-mediated stem-cell commitment switch in soft responsive hydrogels. Nat Mater, 2016, 15: 318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Klumpers D, et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater, 2016, 15: 326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wei Y, Mo X, Zhang P, et al. Directing stem cell differentiation via electrochemical reversible switching between nanotubes and nanotips of polypyrrole array. ACS Nano, 2017, 11: 5915–5924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gandhi MR, Murray P, Spinks GM, et al. Mechanism of electromechanical actuation in polypyrrole. Synth Met, 1995, 73: 247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smela E. Conjugated polymer actuators for biomedical applications. Adv Mater, 2003, 15: 481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations