Science China Materials

, Volume 60, Issue 11, pp 1026–1062 | Cite as

Advanced carbon materials for flexible and wearable sensors

  • Muqiang Jian (蹇木强)
  • Chunya Wang (王春雅)
  • Qi Wang (王琪)
  • Huimin Wang (王惠民)
  • Kailun Xia (夏凯伦)
  • Zhe Yin (闳哲)
  • Mingchao Zhang (张明超)
  • Xiaoping Liang (梁晓平)
  • Yingying Zhang (张莹莹)


Flexible and wearable sensors have drawn extensive concern due to their wide potential applications in wearable electronics and intelligent robots. Flexible sensors with high sensitivity, good flexibility, and excellent stability are highly desirable for monitoring human biomedical signals, movements and the environment. The active materials and the device structures are the keys to achieve high performance. Carbon nanomaterials, including carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, carbon black and carbon nanofibers, are one of the most commonly used active materials for the fabrication of high-performance flexible sensors due to their superior properties. Especially, CNTs and graphene can be assembled into various multi-scaled macroscopic structures, including one dimensional fibers, two dimensional films and three dimensional architectures, endowing the facile design of flexible sensors for wide practical applications. In addition, the hybrid structured carbon materials derived from natural bio-materials also showed a bright prospect for applications in flexible sensors. This review provides a comprehensive presentation of flexible and wearable sensors based on the above various carbon materials. Following a brief introduction of flexible sensors and carbon materials, the fundamentals of typical flexible sensors, such as strain sensors, pressure sensors, temperature sensors and humidity sensors, are presented. Then, the latest progress of flexible sensors based on carbon materials, including the fabrication processes, performance and applications, are summarized. Finally, the remaining major challenges of carbon-based flexible electronics are discussed and the future research directions are proposed.


carbon materials flexible sensors wearable electronics carbon nanotubes graphene 



摘要近年来, 柔性传感器因其在可穿戴电子设备和智能系统中的广阔应用前景而备受关注. 柔性可穿戴传感器具有高灵敏度、 良好的 机械柔性、 优异的稳定性、 人体友好性等特点, 在人体运动与生理信号监测、 环境因素检测等方面具有极大的应用潜力. 一般而言, 柔性 传感器的性能主要取决于敏感材料的选择与器件的结构设计. 得益于其优异的性能和灵活多样的组装结构与形貌>碳材料是目前应用最 广泛的敏感材料之一. 根据需求, 纳米碳材料可组装为各类宏观结枸, 比如一维的纤维, 二维的薄膜和三维的块体结构>从而可用于制备各 种柔性传感器以适应不同的需求.此外, 通过规模化、 低成本的高温碳化工艺可以将天然生物质材料转化为柔性、 导电碳材料, 并用于高 性能柔性传慼器制备. 本文针对碳材料在柔性器件中的应用, 综述了各类碳材料的制备方法与结构特点,并重点介绍了其柔性可穿戴传慼 器的制备与性能. 第一部分简要介绍了柔性传感器与碳材料; 第二部分概述了四类典型柔性传感器的工作原理与性能特点; 第三部分详细 综述了一维、 二维和三维碳材料的制备方法与其在柔性传感器的组装、 性能与应用方面的最新研究进展; 最后, 总结了碳基柔性传感器 领域的发展现状, 讨论了该领域所面临的挑战及其未来前景.



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51672153, 51422204 and 51372132) and the National Key Basic Research and Development Program (2016YFA0200103 and 2013CB228506).


  1. 1.
    Amjadi M, Kyung KU, Park I, et al. Stretchable, skin-mountable, and wearable strain sensors and their potential applications: a review. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 1678–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen K, Gao W, Emaminejad S, et al. Printed carbon nanotube electronics and sensor systems. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 4397–4414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi S, Lee H, Ghaffari R, et al. Recent advances in flexible and stretchable bio-electronic devices integrated with nanomaterials. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 4203–4218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammock ML, Chortos A, Tee BCK, et al. 25th anniversary article: the evolution of electronic skin (e-skin): a brief history, design considerations, and recent progress. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 5997–6038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rim YS, Bae SH, Chen H, et al. Recent progress in materials and devices toward printable and flexible sensors. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 4415–4440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zang Y, Zhang F, Di C, et al. Advances of flexible pressure sensors toward artificial intelligence and health care applications. Mater Horiz, 2015, 2: 140–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McEvoy MA, Correll N. Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication. Science, 2015, 347: 1261689–1261689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trung TQ, Lee NE. Flexible and stretchable physical sensor integrated platforms for wearable human-activity monitoringand personal healthcare. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 4338–4372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang X, Liu Z, Zhang T. Flexible sensing electronics for wearable/attachable health monitoring. Small, 2017, 13: 1602790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang Y, Yang X, Tan Y, et al. Recent progress in flexible and wearable bio-electronics based on nanomaterials. Nano Res, 2017, 10: 1560–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamada T, Hayamizu Y, Yamamoto Y, et al. A stretchable carbon nanotube strain sensor for human-motion detection. Nat Nanotech, 2011, 6: 296–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cai L, Song L, Luan P, et al. Super-stretchable, transparent carbon nanotube-based capacitive strain sensors for human motion detection. Sci Rep, 2013, 3: 3048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang Y, Wang L, Yang T, et al. Wearable and highly sensitive graphene strain sensors for human motion monitoring. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 4666–4670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim KK, Hong S, Cho HM, et al. Highly sensitive and stretchable multidimensional strain sensor with prestrained anisotropic metal nanowire percolation networks. Nano Lett, 2015, 15: 5240–5247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang Y, Yang T, Lao J, et al. Ultra-sensitive graphene strain sensor for sound signal acquisition and recognition. Nano Res, 2015, 8: 1627–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwartz G, Tee BCK, Mei J, et al. Flexible polymer transistors with high pressure sensitivity for application in electronic skin and health monitoring. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dagdeviren C, Su Y, Joe P, et al. Conformable amplified lead zirconate titanate sensors with enhanced piezoelectric response for cutaneous pressure monitoring. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 4496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bae GY, Pak SW, Kim D, et al. Linearly and highly pressuresensitive electronic skin based on a bioinspired hierarchical structural array. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 5300–5306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ha-Chul Jung, Jin-Hee Moon, Dong-Hyun Baek, et al. CNT/PDMS composite flexible dry electrodesfor long-term ECG monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2012, 59: 1472–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Choi M, Jeong JJ, Kim SH, et al. Reduction of motion artifacts and improvement of R peak detecting accuracy using adjacent non-intrusive ECG sensors. Sensors, 2016, 16: 715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    You I, Kim B, Park J, et al. Stretchable e-skin apexcardiogram sensor. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 6359–6364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Atalay O, Kennon WR, Demirok E. Weft-knitted strain sensor for monitoring respiratory rate and its electro-mechanical modeling. IEEE Sensors J, 2015, 15: 110–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao F, Cheng H, Zhang Z, et al. Direct power generation from a graphene oxide film under moisture. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 4351–4357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khan Y, Ostfeld AE, Lochner CM, et al. Monitoring of vital signs with flexible and wearable medical devices. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 4373–4395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ren X, Pei K, Peng B, et al. A low-operating-power and flexible active-matrix organic-transistor temperature-sensor array. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 4832–4838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao H, Zhang Y, Bradford PD, et al. Carbon nanotube yarn strain sensors. Nanotechnology, 2010, 21: 305502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jung S, Kim JH, Kim J, et al. Reverse-micelle-induced porous pressure-sensitive rubber for wearable human-machine interfaces. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 4825–4830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Amjadi M, Yoon YJ, Park I. Ultra-stretchable and skin-mountable strain sensors using carbon nanotubes-ecoflex nanocomposites. Nanotechnology, 2015, 26: 375501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chou HH, Nguyen A, Chortos A, et al. A chameleon-inspired stretchable electronic skin with interactive colour changing controlled by tactile sensing. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 8011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cai G, Wang J, Qian K, et al. Extremely stretchable strain sensors based on conductive self-healing dynamic cross-links hydrogels for human-motion detection. Adv Sci, 2017, 4: 1600190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    He Q, Sudibya HG, Yin Z, et al. Centimeter-long and large-scale micropatterns of reduced graphene oxide films: fabrication and sensing applications. ACS Nano, 2010, 4: 3201–3208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen Z, Ming T, Goulamaly MM, et al. Enhancing the sensitivity of percolative graphene films for flexible and transparent pressure sensor arrays. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 5061–5067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Trung TQ, Tien NT, Kim D, et al. A flexible reduced graphene oxide field-effect transistor for ultrasensitive strain sensing. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Huang X, Qi X, Boey F, et al. Graphene-based composites. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41: 666–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    He Q, Wu S, Yin Z, et al. Graphene-based electronic sensors. Chem Sci, 2012, 3: 1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kenry, Yeo JC, Yu J, et al. Highly flexible graphene oxide nanosuspension liquid-based microfluidic tactile sensor. Small, 2016, 12: 1593–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chi H, Liu YJ, Wang FK, et al. Highly sensitive and fast response colorimetric humidity sensors based on graphene oxides film. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 19882–19886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang X, Qiu Y, Cao W, et al. Highly stretchable and conductive core-sheath chemical vapor deposition graphene fibers and their applications in safe strain sensors. Chem Mater, 2015, 27: 6969–6975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    He Q, Wu S, Gao S, et al. Transparent, flexible, all-reduced graphene oxide thin film transistors. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 5038–5044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sun Q, Kim DH, Park SS, et al. Transparent, low-power pressure sensor matrix based on coplanar-gate graphene transistors. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 4735–4740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mattmann C, Clemens F, Tröster G. Sensor for measuring strain in textile. Sensors, 2008, 8: 3719–3732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang L, Ding T, Wang P. Thin flexible pressure sensor array based on carbon black/silicone rubber nanocomposite. IEEE Sensors J, 2009, 9: 1130–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lin Shu, Tao Hua, Yangyong Wang, et al. In-shoe plantar pressure measurement and analysis system based on fabric pressure sensing array. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed, 2010, 14: 767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yi W, Wang Y, Wang G, et al. Investigation of carbon black/silicone elastomer/dimethylsilicone oil composites for flexible strain sensors. Polymer Testing, 2012, 31: 677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wu X, Han Y, Zhang X, et al. Large-area compliant, low-cost, and versatile pressure-sensing platform based on microcrack-designed carbon black@polyurethane sponge for human-machine interfacing. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 6246–6256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sun B, Long YZ, Liu SL, et al. Fabrication of curled conducting polymer microfibrous arrays via a novel electrospinning method for stretchable strain sensors. Nanoscale, 2013, 5: 7041–7045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pan L, Chortos A, Yu G, et al. An ultra-sensitive resistive pressure sensor based on hollow-sphere microstructure induced elasticity in conducting polymer film. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 3002Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Savagatrup S, Chan E, Renteria-Garcia SM, et al. Plasticization of PEDOT:PSS by common additives for mechanically robust organic solar cells and wearable sensors. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tee BCK, Wang C, Allen R, et al. An electrically and mechanically self-healing composite with pressure-and flexion-sensitive properties for electronic skin applications. Nat Nanotech, 2012, 7: 825–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Amjadi M, Pichitpajongkit A, Lee S, et al. Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensor based on silver nanowire-elastomer nanocomposite. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 5154–5163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gong S, Schwalb W, Wang Y, et al. A wearable and highly sensitive pressure sensor with ultrathin gold nanowires. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 3132Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kang D, Pikhitsa PV, Choi YW, et al. Ultrasensitive mechanical crack-based sensor inspired by the spider sensory system. Nature, 2014, 516: 222–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lee J, Kim S, Lee J, et al. A stretchable strain sensor based on a metal nanoparticle thin film for human motion detection. Nanoscale, 2014, 6: 11932–11939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gerratt AP, Michaud HO, Lacour SP. Elastomeric electronic skin for prosthetic tactile sensation. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 2287–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Su B, Gong S, Ma Z, et al. Mimosa-inspired design of a flexible pressure sensor with touch sensitivity. Small, 2015, 11: 1886–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wu W, Wen X, Wang ZL. Taxel-addressable matrix of verticalnanowire piezotronic transistors for active and adaptive tactile imaging. Science, 2013, 340: 952–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ha M, Lim S, Park J, et al. Bioinspired interlocked and hierarchical design of ZnO nanowire arrays for static and dynamic pressure-sensitive electronic skins. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 2841–2849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Segevbar M, Haick H. Flexible sensors based on nanoparticles. ACS Nano, 2013, 7: 8366–8378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Xia K, Jian M, Zhang Y. Advances in wearable and flexible conductors based on nanocarbon materials. Acta Phys-Chim Sin, 2016, 32: 2427–2446Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lu W, Zu M, Byun JH, et al. State of the art of carbon nanotube fibers: opportunities and challenges. Adv Mater, 2012, 24: 1805–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Meng F, Lu W, Li Q, et al. Graphene-based fibers: a review. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 5113–5131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Du J, Pei S, Ma L, et al. 25th anniversary article: carbon nanotubeand graphene-based transparent conductive films for optoelectronic devices. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 1958–1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sun DM, Liu C, Ren WC, et al. A review of carbon nanotube-and graphene-based flexible thin-film transistors. Small, 2013, 9: 1188–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Du R, Zhao Q, Zhang N, et al. Macroscopic carbon nanotubebased 3D monoliths. Small, 2015, 11: 3263–3289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Li Z, Liu Z, Sun H, et al. Superstructured assembly of nanocarbons: fullerenes, nanotubes, and graphene. Chem Rev, 2015, 115: 7046–7117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhang Q, Huang JQ, Qian WZ, et al. The road for nanomaterials industry: a review of carbon nanotube production, post-treatment, and bulk applications for composites and energy storage. Small, 2013, 9: 1237–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Luo N, Dai W, Li C, et al. Flexible piezoresistive sensor patch enabling ultralow power cuffless blood pressure measurement. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 1178–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wang C, Li X, Gao E, et al. Carbonized silk fabric for ultrastretchable, highly sensitive, and wearable strain sensors. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 6640–6648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zhang M, Wang C, Wang H, et al. Carbonized cotton fabric for high-performance wearable strain sensors. Adv Funct Mater, 2017, 27: 1604795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wang C, Zhang M, Xia K, et al. Intrinsically stretchable and conductive textile by a scalable process for elastic wearable electronics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9: 13331–13338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Yan C, Wang J, Kang W, et al. Highly stretchable piezoresistive graphene-nanocellulose nanopaper for strain sensors. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 2022–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kim T, Park J, Sohn J, et al. Bioinspired, highly stretchable, and conductive dry adhesives based on 1D-2D hybrid carbon nanocomposites for all-in-one ecg electrodes. ACS Nano, 2016, 10: 4770–4778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Lim S, Son D, Kim J, et al. Transparent and stretchable interactive human machine interface based on patterned graphene heterostructures. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Li YL, Kinloch IA, Windle AH. Direct spinning of carbon nanotube fibers from chemical vapor deposition synthesis. Science, 2004, 304: 276–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Xu Z, Liu Y, Zhao X, et al. Ultrastiff and strong graphene fibers via full-scale synergetic defect engineering. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 6449–6456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Zhang M, Huang L, Chen J, et al. Ultratough, ultrastrong, and highly conductive graphene films with arbitrary sizes. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 7588–7592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Gui X, Wei J, Wang K, et al. Carbon nanotube sponges. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 617–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sun H, Xu Z, Gao C. Multifunctional, ultra-flyweight, synergistically assembled carbon aerogels. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 2554–2560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wang X, Gu Y, Xiong Z, et al. Silk-molded flexible, ultrasensitive, and highly stable electronic skin for monitoring human physiological signals. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 1336–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Trung TQ, Ramasundaram S, Hwang BU, et al. An all-elastomeric transparent and stretchable temperature sensor for bodyattachable wearable electronics. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 502–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Yan C, Wang J, Lee PS. Stretchable graphene thermistor with tunable thermal index. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 2130–2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Han DD, Zhang YL, Jiang HB, et al. Moisture-responsive graphene paper prepared by self-controlled photoreduction. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Zhao J, He C, Yang R, et al. Ultra-sensitive strain sensors based on piezoresistive nanographene films. Appl Phys Lett, 2012, 101: 063112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Zhao J, Wang G, Yang R, et al. Tunable piezoresistivity of nanographene films for strain sensing. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 1622–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Lipomi DJ, Vosgueritchian M, Tee BCK, et al. Skin-like pressure and strain sensors based on transparent elastic films of carbon nanotubes. Nat Nanotech, 2011, 6: 788–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Yao S, Zhu Y. Wearable multifunctional sensors using printed stretchable conductors made of silver nanowires. Nanoscale, 2014, 6: 2345–2352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Sun Q, Seung W, Kim BJ, et al. Active matrix electronic skin strain sensor based on piezopotential-powered graphene transistors. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 3411–3417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Zhou J, Gu Y, Fei P, et al. Flexible piezotronic strain sensor. Nano Lett, 2008, 8: 3035–3040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Chen S, Lou Z, Chen D, et al. Highly flexible strain sensor based on ZnO nanowires and P(VDF-TrFE) fibers for wearable electronic device. Sci China Mater, 2016, 59: 173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Li X, Zhang R, Yu W, et al. Stretchable and highly sensitive graphene-on-polymer strain sensors. Sci Rep, 2012, 2: 870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Rahimi R, Ochoa M, Yu W, et al. Highly stretchable and sensitive unidirectional strain sensor via laser carbonization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 4463–4470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tang Y, Zhao Z, Hu H, et al. Highly stretchable and ultrasensitive strain sensor based on reduced graphene oxide microtubeselastomer composite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 27432–27439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Yang T, Wang W, Zhang H, et al. Tactile sensing system based on arrays of graphene woven microfabrics: electromechanical behavior and electronic skin application. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 10867–10875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ho DH, Sun Q, Kim SY, et al. Stretchable and multimodal all graphene electronic skin. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 2601–2608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Song Y, Lee JI, Pyo S, et al. A highly sensitive flexible strain sensor based on the contact resistance change of carbon nanotube bundles. Nanotechnology, 2016, 27: 205502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ryu S, Lee P, Chou JB, et al. Extremely elastic wearable carbon nanotube fiber strain sensor for monitoring of human motion. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 5929–5936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Choi C, Lee JM, Kim SH, et al. Twistable and stretchable sandwich structured fiber for wearable sensors and supercapacitors. Nano Lett, 2016, 16: 7677–7684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Samad YA, Li Y, Schiffer A, et al. Graphene foam developed with a novel two-step technique for low and high strains and pressuresensing applications. Small, 2015, 11: 2380–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Zhao S, Gao Y, Li J, et al. Layer-by-layer assembly of multifunctional porous N-doped carbon nanotube hybrid architectures for flexible conductors and beyond. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 6716–6723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Lee Y, Bae S, Jang H, et al. Wafer-scale synthesis and transfer of graphene films. Nano Lett, 2010, 10: 490–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Tian H, Shu Y, Cui YL, et al. Scalable fabrication of high-performance and flexible graphene strain sensors. Nanoscale, 2014, 6: 699–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Qin Y, Peng Q, Ding Y, et al. Lightweight, superelastic, and mechanically flexible graphene/polyimide nanocomposite foam for strain sensor application. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 8933–8941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Luo S, Hoang PT, Liu T. Direct laser writing for creating porous graphitic structures and their use for flexible and highly sensitive sensor and sensor arrays. Carbon, 2016, 96: 522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Lin Y, Dong X, Liu S, et al. Graphene-elastomer composites with segregated nanostructured network for liquid and strain sensing application. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 24143–24151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Lin Y, Liu S, Chen S, et al. A highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensor based on graphene-elastomer composites with a novel double-interconnected network. J Mater Chem C, 2016, 4: 6345–6352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Park S, Kim H, Vosgueritchian M, et al. Stretchable energy-harvesting tactile electronic skin capable of differentiating multiple mechanical stimuli modes. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 7324–7332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Li C, Cui YL, Tian GL, et al. Flexible CNT-array double helices Strain Sensor with high stretchability for Motion Capture. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 15554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Liu ZF, Fang S, Moura FA, et al. Hierarchically buckled sheathcore fibers for superelastic electronics, sensors, and muscles. Science, 2015, 349: 400–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Roh E, Hwang BU, Kim D, et al. Stretchable, transparent, ultrasensitive, and patchable strain sensor for human-machine interfaces comprising a nanohybrid of carbon nanotubes and conductive elastomers. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 6252–6261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Wang H, Liu Z, Ding J, et al. Downsized sheath-core conducting fibers for weavable superelastic wires, biosensors, supercapacitors, and strain sensors. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 4998–5007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Fu XW, Liao ZM, Zhou JX, et al. Strain dependent resistance in chemical vapor deposition grown graphene. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 99: 213107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Bae SH, Lee Y, Sharma BK, et al. Graphene-based transparent strain sensor. Carbon, 2013, 51: 236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Du D, Li P, Ouyang J. Graphene coated nonwoven fabrics as wearable sensors. J Mater Chem C, 2016, 4: 3224–3230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Nam SH, Jeon PJ, Min SW, et al. Highly sensitive non-classical strain gauge using organic heptazole thin-film transistor circuit on a flexible substrate. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 4413–4419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Zhang Z, Liao Q, Zhang X, et al. Highly efficient piezotronic strain sensors with symmetrical Schottky contacts on the monopolar surface of ZnO nanobelts. Nanoscale, 2015, 7: 1796–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Luo S, Liu T. SWCNT/graphite nanoplatelet hybrid thin films for self-temperature-compensated, highly sensitive, and extensible piezoresistive sensors. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 5650–5657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Shi J, Li X, Cheng H, et al. Graphene reinforced carbon nanotube networks for wearable strain sensors. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 2078–2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Park J, Lee Y, Hong J, et al. Tactile-direction-sensitive and stretchable electronic skins based on human-skin-inspired interlocked microstructures. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 12020–12029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Park J, Lee Y, Hong J, et al. Giant tunneling piezoresistance of composite elastomers with interlocked microdome arrays for ultrasensitive and multimodal electronic skins. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 4689–4697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Yeom C, Chen K, Kiriya D, et al. Large-area compliant tactile sensors using printed carbon nanotube active-matrix backplanes. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 1561–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Hou C, Wang H, Zhang Q, et al. Highly conductive, flexible, and compressible all-graphene passive electronic skin for sensing human touch. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 5018–5024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Zhu B, Niu Z, Wang H, et al. Microstructured graphene arrays for highly sensitive flexible tactile sensors. Small, 2014, 10: 3625–3631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Tian H, Shu Y, Wang XF, et al. A graphene-based resistive pressure sensor with record-high sensitivity in a wide pressure range. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 8603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Tang Y, Gong S, Chen Y, et al. Manufacturable conducting rubber ambers and stretchable conductors from copper nanowire aerogel monoliths. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 5707–5714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Choong CL, Shim MB, Lee BS, et al. Highly stretchable resistive pressure sensors using a conductive elastomeric composite on a micropyramid array. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 3451–3458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Zhong W, Liu Q, Wu Y, et al. A nanofiber based artificial electronic skin with high pressure sensitivity and 3D conformability. Nanoscale, 2016, 8: 12105–12112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Honda W, Harada S, Arie T, et al. Wearable, human-interactive, health-monitoring, wireless devices fabricated by macroscale printing techniques. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 3299–3304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Takei K, Yu Z, Zheng M, et al. Highly sensitive electronic whiskers based on patterned carbon nanotube and silver nanoparticle composite films. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111: 1703–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Pang C, Lee GY, Kim TI, et at. A flexible and highly sensitive strain-gauge sensor using reversible interlocking of nanofibres. Nat Mater, 2012, 11: 795–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Jian M, Xia K, Wang Q, et al. Flexible and highly sensitive pressure sensors based on bionic hierarchical structures. Adv Funct Mater, 2017, 27: 1606066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Sheng L, Liang Y, Jiang L, et al. Bubble-decorated honeycomblike graphene film as ultrahigh sensitivity pressure sensors. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 6545–6551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Wang X, Li T, Adams J, et al. Transparent, stretchable, carbonnanotube-inlaid conductors enabled by standard replication technology for capacitive pressure, strain and touch sensors. J Mater Chem A, 2013, 1: 3580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Li T, Luo H, Qin L, et al. Flexible capacitive tactile sensor based on micropatterned dielectric layer. Small, 2016, 12: 5042–5048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Zang Y, Zhang F, Huang D, et al. Flexible suspended gate organic thin-film transistors for ultra-sensitive pressure detection. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 6269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Tien NT, Jeon S, Kim DI, et al. A flexible bimodal sensor array for simultaneous sensing of pressure and temperature. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 796–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Tien NT, Trung TQ, Seoul YG, et al. Physically responsive fieldeffect transistors with giant electromechanical coupling induced by nanocomposite gate dielectrics. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 7069–7076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Zhang F, Zang Y, Huang D, et al. Flexible and self-powered temperature-pressure dual-parameter sensors using microstructure-frame-supported organic thermoelectric materials. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 8356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Yang Y, Lin ZH, Hou T, et al. Nanowire-composite based flexible thermoelectric nanogenerators and self-powered temperature sensors. Nano Res, 2012, 5: 888–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Tien NT, Seol YG, Dao LHA, et al. Utilizing highly crystalline pyroelectric material as functional gate dielectric in organic thinfilm transistors. Adv Mater, 2009, 21: 910–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Jeon J, Lee HBR, Bao Z. Flexible wireless temperature sensors based on Ni microparticle-filled binary polymer composites. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 850–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Kim DH, Lu N, Ma R, et al. Epidermal electronics. Science, 2011, 333: 838–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Yeo WH, Kim YS, Lee J, et al. Multifunctional epidermal electronics printed directly onto the skin. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 2773–2778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Son D, Lee J, Qiao S, et al. Multifunctional wearable devices for diagnosis and therapy of movement disorders. Nat Nanotech, 2014, 9: 397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Webb RC, Bonifas AP, Behnaz A, et al. Ultrathin conformal devices for precise and continuous thermal characterization of human skin. Nat Mater, 2013, 12: 938–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Feteira A. Negative temperature coefficient resistance (NTCR) ceramic thermistors: an industrial perspective. J Am Ceramic Soc, 2009, 92: 967–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Huang CC, Kao ZK, Liao YC. Flexible miniaturized nickel oxide thermistor arrays via inkjet printing technology. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2013, 5: 12954–12959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Honda W, Harada S, Ishida S, et al. High-performance, mechanically flexible, and vertically integrated 3D Carbon nanotube and InGaZnO complementary circuits with a temperature sensor. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 4674–4680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Matzeu G, Pucci A, Savi S, et al. A temperature sensor based on a MWCNT/SEBS nanocomposite. Sensors Actuators A-Phys, 2012, 178: 94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Trung TQ, Ramasundaram S, Hong SW, et al. Flexible and transparent nanocomposite of reduced graphene oxide and P (VDF-TrFE) copolymer for high thermal responsivity in a fieldeffect transistor. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 3438–3445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Yang J, Wei D, Tang L, et al. Wearable temperature sensor based on graphene nanowalls. RSC Adv, 2015, 5: 25609–25615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Kim J, Lee M, Shim HJ, et al. Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 5747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Gao L, Zhang Y, Malyarchuk V, et al. Epidermal photonic devices for quantitative imaging of temperature and thermal transport characteristics of the skin. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 4938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Wu X, Ma Y, Zhang G, et al. Thermally stable, biocompatible, and flexible organic field-effect transistors and their application in temperature sensing arrays for artificial skin. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 2138–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Kolpakov SA, Gordon NT, Mou C, et al. Toward a new generation of photonic humidity sensors. Sensors, 2014, 14: 3986–4013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Kim SY, Park S, Park HW, et al. Highly sensitive and multimodal all-carbon skin sensors capable of simultaneously detecting tactile and biological stimuli. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 4178–4185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Yu HW, Kim HK, Kim T, et al. Self-powered humidity sensor based on graphene oxide composite film intercalated by poly (sodium 4-styrenesulfonate). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 8320–8326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Han JW, Kim B, Li J, et al. Carbon nanotube based humidity sensor on cellulose paper. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116: 22094–22097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Hwang SH, Kang D, Ruoff RS, et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol) reinforced and toughened with poly(dopamine)-treated graphene oxide, and its use for humidity sensing. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 6739–6747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Qi H, Liu J, Deng Y, et al. Cellulose fibres with carbon nanotube networks for water sensing. J Mater Chem A, 2014, 2: 5541–5547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Wang Z, Xiao Y, Cui X, et al. Humidity-sensing properties of urchinlike CuO nanostructures modified by reduced graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 3888–3895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Alwis L, Sun T, Grattan KTV. Optical fibre-based sensor technology for humidity and moisture measurement: review of recent progress. Measurement, 2013, 46: 4052–4074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Sheng L, Dajing C, Yuquan C. A surface acoustic wave humidity sensor with high sensitivity based on electrospun MWCNT/Nafion nanofiber films. Nanotechnology, 2011, 22: 265504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Hsueh HT, Hsueh TJ, Chang SJ, et al. A flexible ZnO nanowirebased humidity sensor. IEEE Trans NanoTech, 2012, 11: 520–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Borini S, White R, Wei D, et al. Ultrafast graphene oxide humidity sensors. ACS Nano, 2013, 7: 11166–11173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Cheng H, Hu Y, Zhao F, et al. Moisture-activated torsional graphene-fiber motor. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 2909–2913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Zhao F, Wang L, Zhao Y, et al. Graphene oxide nanoribbon assembly toward moisture-powered information storage. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 1604972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Cheng H, Liu J, Zhao Y, et al. Graphene fibers with predetermined deformation as moisture-triggered actuators and robots. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 52: 10482–10486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    He S, Chen P, Qiu L, et al. A mechanically actuating carbonnanotube fiber in response to water and moisture. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2015, 54: 14880–14884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Vigolo B. Macroscopic fibers and ribbons of oriented carbon nanotubes. Science, 2000, 290: 1331–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Ericson LM, Fan H, Peng H, et al. Macroscopic, neat, singlewalled carbon nanotube fibers. Science, 2004, 305: 1447–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Behabtu N, Young CC, Tsentalovich DE, et al. Strong, light, multifunctional fibers of carbon nanotubes with ultrahigh conductivity. Science, 2013, 339: 182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Jiang K, Li Q, Fan S. Nanotechnology: spinning continuous carbon nanotube yarns. Nature, 2002, 419: 801–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Zhang M, Atkinson KR, Baughman RH. Multifunctional carbon nanotube yarns by downsizing an ancient technology. Science, 2004, 306: 1358–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Zhong XH, Li YL, Liu YK, et al. Continuous multilayered carbon nanotube yarns. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 692–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Wang JN, Luo XG, Wu T, et al. High-strength carbon nanotube fibre-like ribbon with high ductility and high electrical conductivity. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 3848Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    Zhang Y, Zou G, Doorn SK, et al. Tailoring the morphology of carbon nanotube arrays: from spinnable forests to undulating foams. ACS Nano, 2009, 3: 2157–2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Zhang X, Li Q, Tu Y, et al. Strong carbon-nanotube fibers spun from long carbon-nanotube arrays. Small, 2007, 3: 244–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Koziol K, Vilatela J, Moisala A, et al. High-performance carbon nanotube fiber. Science, 2007, 318: 1892–1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Xu Z, Sun H, Zhao X, et al. Ultrastrong fibers assembled from giant graphene oxide sheets. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 188–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Xu Z, Gao C. Graphene chiral liquid crystals and macroscopic assembled fibres. Nat Commun, 2011, 2: 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Hu C, Zhao Y, Cheng H, et al. Graphene microtubings: controlled fabrication and site-specific functionalization. Nano Lett, 2012, 12: 5879–5884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Cruz-Silva R, Morelos-Gomez A, Kim HI, et al. Super-stretchable graphene oxide macroscopic fibers with outstanding knotability fabricated by dry film scrolling. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 5959–5967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Li X, Zhao T, Chen Q, et al. Flexible all solid-state supercapacitors based on chemical vapor deposition derived graphene fibers. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2013, 15: 17752–17757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Chen T, Dai L. Macroscopic graphene fibers directly assembled from CVD-grown fiber-shaped hollow graphene tubes. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2015, 54: 14947–14950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Li M, Zhang X, Wang X, et al. Ultrastrong graphene-based fibers with increased elongation. Nano Lett, 2016, 16: 6511–6515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Xin G, Yao T, Sun H, et al. Highly thermally conductive and mechanically strong graphene fibers. Science, 2015, 349: 1083–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Sun H, You X, Deng J, et al. Novel graphene/carbon nanotube composite fibers for efficient wire-shaped miniature energy devices. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 2868–2873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Shang Y, Hua C, Xu W, et al. Meter-long spiral carbon nanotube fibers show ultrauniformity and flexibility. Nano Lett, 2016, 16: 1768–1775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Hua C, Shang Y, Li X, et al. Helical graphene oxide fibers as a stretchable sensor and an electrocapillary sucker. Nanoscale, 2016, 8: 10659–10668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Zhao F, Zhao Y, Cheng H, et al. A graphene fibriform responsor for sensing heat, humidity, and mechanical changes. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2015, 54: 14951–14955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Zhong J, Zhong Q, Hu Q, et al. Stretchable self-powered fiberbased strain sensor. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 1798–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Cheng Y, Wang R, Sun J, et al. A stretchable and highly sensitive graphene-based fiber for sensing tensile strain, bending, and torsion. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 7365–7371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Yuan W, Zhou Q, Li Y, et al. Small and light strain sensors based on graphene coated human hairs. Nanoscale, 2015, 7: 16361–16365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Zhang M, Wang C, Wang Q, et al. Sheath-core graphite/silk fiber made by dry-meyer-rod-coating for wearable strain sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 20894–20899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Tai Y, Lubineau G. Double-twisted conductive smart threads comprising a homogeneously and a gradient-coated thread for multidimensional flexible pressure-sensing devices. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 4078–4084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Qi H, Schulz B, Vad T, et al. Novel carbon nanotube/cellulose composite fibers as multifunctional materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 22404–22412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Wu Z, Chen Z, Du X, et al. Transparent, conductive carbon nanotube films. Science, 2004, 305: 1273–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Dan B, Irvin GC, Pasquali M. Continuous and scalable fabrication of transparent conducting carbon nanotube films. ACS Nano, 2009, 3: 835–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Hellstrom SL, Lee HW, Bao Z. Polymer-assisted direct deposition of uniform carbon nanotube bundle networks for high performance transparent electrodes. ACS Nano, 2009, 3: 1423–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Tenent RC, Barnes TM, Bergeson JD, et al. Ultrasmooth, largearea, high-uniformity, conductive transparent single-walled-carbon-nanotube films for photovoltaics produced by ultrasonic spraying. Adv Mater, 2009, 21: 3210–3216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Sreekumar TV, Liu T, Kumar S, et al. Single-wall carbon nanotube films. Chem Mater, 2003, 15: 175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Okimoto H, Takenobu T, Yanagi K, et al. Tunable carbon nanotube thin-film transistors produced exclusively via inkjet printing. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 3981–3986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Shim BS, Zhu J, Jan E, et al. Transparent conductors from layerby-layer assembled swnt films: importance of mechanical properties and a new figure of merit. ACS Nano, 2010, 4: 3725–3734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Wang X, Li G, Liu R, et al. Reproducible layer-by-layer exfoliation for free-standing ultrathin films of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 21824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Lee YD, Cho WS, Kim YC, et al. Field emission of ribonucleic acid-carbon nanotube films prepared by electrophoretic deposition. Carbon, 2012, 50: 845–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Ma W, Song L, Yang R, et al. Directly synthesized strong, highly conducting, transparent single-walled carbon nanotube films. Nano Lett, 2007, 7: 2307–2311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Zhang M, Fang S, Zakhidov AA, et al. Strong, transparent, multifunctional, carbon nanotube sheets. Science, 2005, 309: 1215–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. 208.
    Feng C, Liu K, Wu JS, et al. Flexible, stretchable, transparent conducting films made from superaligned carbon nanotubes. Adv Funct Mater, 2010, 20: 885–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. 209.
    Jiang K, Wang J, Li Q, et al. Superaligned carbon nanotube arrays, films, and yarns: a road to applications. Adv Mater, 2011, 23: 1154–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Pint CL, Xu YQ, Pasquali M, et al. Formation of highly dense aligned ribbons and transparent films of single-walled carbon nanotubes directly from carpets. ACS Nano, 2008, 2: 1871–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Wang D, Song P, Liu C, et al. Highly oriented carbon nanotube papers made of aligned carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology, 2008, 19: 075609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Dikin DA, Stankovich S, Zimney EJ, et al. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature, 2007, 448: 457–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Jeon HG, Huh YH, Yun SH, et al. Improved homogeneity and surface coverage of graphene oxide layers fabricated by horizontal-dip-coating for solution-processable organic semiconducting devices. J Mater Chem C, 2014, 2: 2622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    Hempel M, Nezich D, Kong J, et al. A novel class of strain gauges based on layered percolative films of 2D materials. Nano Lett, 2012, 12: 5714–5718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Wang X, Xiong Z, Liu Z, et al. Exfoliation at the liquid/air interface to assemble reduced graphene oxide ultrathin films for a flexible noncontact sensing device. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 1370–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    Li X, Sun P, Fan L, et al. Multifunctional graphene woven fabrics. Sci Rep, 2012, 2: 395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. 217.
    Shi E, Li H, Yang L, et al. Carbon nanotube network embroidered graphene films for monolithic all-carbon electronics. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 682–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Guo Y, Di C, Liu H, et al. General route toward patterning of graphene oxide by a combination of wettability modulation and spin-coating. ACS Nano, 2010, 4: 5749–5754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Liu Z, Li Z, Xu Z, et al. Wet-spun continuous graphene films. Chem Mater, 2014, 26: 6786–6795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. 220.
    Chen C, Yang QH, Yang Y, et al. Self-assembled free-standing graphite oxide membrane. Adv Mater, 2009, 21: 3007–3011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. 221.
    Shao JJ, Lv W, Yang QH. Self-assembly of graphene oxide at interfaces. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 5586–5612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    Li X, Cai W, An J, et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science, 2009, 324: 1312–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. 223.
    Xia K, Artyukhov VI, Sun L, et al. Growth of large-area aligned pentagonal graphene domains on high-index copper surfaces. Nano Res, 2016, 9: 2182–2189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. 224.
    Kim KS, Zhao Y, Jang H, et al. Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature, 2009, 457: 706–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    Chen XD, Chen Z, Jiang WS, et al. Fast growth and broad applications of 25-inch uniform graphene glass. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 1603428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. 226.
    Chen Z, Guan B, Chen X, et al. Fast and uniform growth of graphene glass using confined-flow chemical vapor deposition and its unique applications. Nano Res, 2016, 9: 3048–3055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. 227.
    Bae S, Kim H, Lee Y, et al. Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nat Nanotech, 2010, 5: 574–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. 228.
    Lin J, Peng Z, Liu Y, et al. Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 5714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. 229.
    Huang ZD, Zhang B, Oh SW, et al. Self-assembled reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube thin films as electrodes for supercapacitors. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 3591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. 230.
    Shao JJ, Lv W, Guo Q, et al. Hybridization of graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes at the liquid/air interface. Chem Commun, 2012, 48: 3706–3708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. 231.
    Yan Z, Peng Z, Casillas G, et al. Rebar graphene. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 5061–5068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. 232.
    Zhang Y, Sheehan CJ, Zhai J, et al. Polymer-embedded carbon nanotube ribbons for stretchable conductors. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 3027–3031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. 233.
    Guo FM, Cui X, Wang KL, et al. Stretchable and compressible strain sensors based on carbon nanotube meshes. Nanoscale, 2016, 8: 19352–19358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. 234.
    Harada S, Honda W, Arie T, et al. Fully printed, highly sensitive multifunctional artificial electronic whisker arrays integrated with strain and temperature sensors. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 3921–3927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. 235.
    Harada S, Kanao K, Yamamoto Y, et al. Fully printed flexible fingerprint-like three-axis tactile and slip force and temperature sensors for artificial skin. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 12851–12857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. 236.
    Liu Q, Chen J, Li Y, et al. High-performance strain sensors with fish-scale-like graphene-sensing layers for full-range detection of human motions. ACS Nano, 2016, 10: 7901–7906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. 237.
    Wang Y, Yang R, Shi Z, et al. Super-elastic graphene ripples for flexible strain sensors. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 3645–3650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. 238.
    Chen S, Wei Y, Yuan X, et al. A highly stretchable strain sensor based on a graphene/silver nanoparticle synergic conductive network and a sandwich structure. J Mater Chem C, 2016, 4: 4304–4311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. 239.
    Boland CS, Khan U, Backes C, et al. Sensitive, high-strain, highrate bodily motion sensors based on graphene-rubber composites. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 8819–8830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. 240.
    Lu N, Lu C, Yang S, et al. Highly sensitive skin-mountable strain gauges based entirely on elastomers. Adv Funct Mater, 2012, 22: 4044–4050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. 241.
    Wang Q, Jian M, Wang C, et al. Carbonized silk nanofiber membrane for transparent and sensitive electronic skin. Adv Funct Mater, 2017, 27: 1605657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  242. 242.
    Wang DY, Tao LQ, Liu Y, et al. High performance flexible strain sensor based on self-locked overlapping graphene sheets. Nanoscale, 2016, 8: 20090–20095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  243. 243.
    Tao LQ, Tian H, Liu Y, et al. An intelligent artificial throat with sound-sensing ability based on laser induced graphene. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 14579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. 244.
    Bryning MB, Milkie DE, Islam MF, et al. Carbon nanotube aerogels. Adv Mater, 2007, 19: 661–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  245. 245.
    Gutierrez MC, Hortiguela MJ, Amarilla JM, et al. Macroporous 3D architectures of self-assembled MWCNT surface decorated with Pt nanoparticles as anodes for a direct methanol fuel cell. J Phys Chem C, 2007, 111: 5557–5560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. 246.
    Xie X, Ye M, Hu L, et al. Carbon nanotube-coated macroporous sponge for microbial fuel cell electrodes. Energ Environ Sci, 2012, 5: 5265–5270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  247. 247.
    Hata K, Futaba DN, Mizuno K, et al. Water-assisted highly efficient synthesis of impurity-free single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science, 2004, 306: 1362–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  248. 248.
    Tsuji T, Hata K, Futaba DN, et al. Unexpected efficient synthesis of millimeter-scale single-wall carbon nanotube forests using a sputtered MgO catalyst underlayer enabled by a simple treatment process. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138: 16608–16611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  249. 249.
    Ren ZF, Huang ZP, Xu JW, et al. Synthesis of large arrays of wellaligned carbon nanotubes on glass. Science, 1998, 282: 1105–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  250. 250.
    Fan S, Chapline MG, Franklin NR, et al. Self-oriented regular arrays of carbon nanotubes and their field emission properties. Science, 1999, 283: 512–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  251. 251.
    Xu Y, Sheng K, Li C, et al. Self-assembled graphene hydrogelvia a one-step hydrothermal process. ACS Nano, 2010, 4: 4324–4330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  252. 252.
    Hu H, Zhao Z, Wan W, et al. Ultralight and highly compressible graphene aerogels. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 2219–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  253. 253.
    Niu Z, Liu L, Zhang L, et al. A universal strategy to prepare functional porous graphene hybrid architectures. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 3681–3687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. 254.
    Qiu L, Liu JZ, Chang SLY, et al. Biomimetic superelastic graphene-based cellular monoliths. Nat Commun, 2012, 3: 1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  255. 255.
    Yang ZY, Jin LJ, Lu GQ, et al. Sponge-templated preparation of high surface area graphene with ultrahigh capacitive deionization performance. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 3917–3925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  256. 256.
    Chen Z, Ren W, Gao L, et al. Three-dimensional flexible and conductive interconnected graphene networks grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat Mater, 2011, 10: 424–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  257. 257.
    Peng Q, Li Y, He X, et al. Graphene nanoribbon aerogels unzipped from carbon nanotube sponges. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 3241–3247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  258. 258.
    Dong X, Ma Y, Zhu G, et al. Synthesis of graphene-carbon nanotube hybrid foam and its use as a novel three-dimensional electrode for electrochemical sensing. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 17044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  259. 259.
    Kim ND, Li Y, Wang G, et al. Growth and transfer of seamless 3D graphene-nanotube hybrids. Nano Lett, 2016, 16: 1287–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  260. 260.
    Lin J, Zhang C, Yan Z, et al. 3-dimensional graphene carbon nanotube carpet-based microsupercapacitors with high electrochemical performance. Nano Lett, 2013, 13: 72–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. 261.
    Tang C, Zhang Q, Zhao MQ, et al. Resilient aligned carbon nanotube/graphene sandwiches for robust mechanical energy storage. Nano Energ, 2014, 7: 161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  262. 262.
    Wang W, Guo S, Penchev M, et al. Three dimensional few layer graphene and carbon nanotube foam architectures for high fidelity supercapacitors. Nano Energ, 2013, 2: 294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. 263.
    Zhang W, Xie H, Zhang R, et al. Synthesis of three-dimensional carbon nanotube/graphene hybrid materials by a two-step chemical vapor deposition process. Carbon, 2015, 86: 358–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  264. 264.
    Boland CS, Khan U, Ryan G, et al. Sensitive electromechanical sensors using viscoelastic graphene-polymer nanocomposites. Science, 2016, 354: 1257–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  265. 265.
    Chen H, Su Z, Song Y, et al. Omnidirectional bending and pressure sensor based on stretchable CNT-PU sponge. Adv Funct Mater, 2017, 27: 1604434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  266. 266.
    Qiu L, Bulut Coskun M, Tang Y, et al. Ultrafast dynamic piezoresistive response of graphene-based cellular elastomers. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  267. 267.
    Yao HB, Ge J, Wang CF, et al. A flexible and highly pressuresensitive graphene-polyurethane sponge based on fractured microstructure design. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 6692–6698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  268. 268.
    Zhao W, Li Y, Wu S, et al. Highly stable carbon nanotube/polyaniline porous network for multifunctional applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 34027–34033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  269. 269.
    Wang M, Anoshkin IV, Nasibulin AG, et al. Modifying native nanocellulose aerogels with carbon nanotubes for mechanoresponsive conductivity and pressure sensing. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 2428–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  270. 270.
    Jeong YR, Park H, Jin SW, et al. Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensors using fragmentized graphene foam. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 4228–4236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  271. 271.
    Zhang P, Lv L, Cheng Z, et al. Superelastic, macroporous polystyrene-mediated graphene aerogels for active pressure sensing. Chem Asian J, 2016, 11: 1071–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  272. 272.
    Lin Y, Liu S, Chen S, et al. A highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensor based on graphene-elastomer composites with a novel double-interconnected network. J Mater Chem C, 2016, 4: 6345–6352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  273. 273.
    Si Y, Wang X, Yan C, et al. Ultralight biomass-derived carbonaceous nanofibrous aerogels with superelasticity and high pressure-sensitivity. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 9512–9518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  274. 274.
    Bendi R, Bhavanasi V, Parida K, et al. Self-powered graphene thermistor. Nano Energ, 2016, 26: 586–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  275. 275.
    Fuh YK, Kuo CC, Huang ZM, et al. A transparent and flexible graphene-piezoelectric fiber generator. Small, 2016, 12: 1875–1881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  276. 276.
    Wang X, Yang B, Liu J, et al. A flexible triboelectric-piezoelectric hybrid nanogenerator based on P(VDF-TrFE) nanofibers and PDMS/MWCNT for wearable devices. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 36409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  277. 277.
    Guo H, Yeh MH, Zi Y, et al. Ultralight cut-paper-based selfcharging power unit for self-powered portable electronic and medical systems. ACS Nano, 2017, 11: 4475–4482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  278. 278.
    Hwang BU, Lee JH, Trung TQ, et al. Transparent stretchable selfpowered patchable sensor platform with ultrasensitive recognition of human activities. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 8801–8810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  279. 279.
    Luo J, Fan FR, Zhou T, et al. Ultrasensitive self-powered pressure sensing system. Extreme Mech Lett, 2015, 2: 28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muqiang Jian (蹇木强)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chunya Wang (王春雅)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qi Wang (王琪)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Huimin Wang (王惠民)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kailun Xia (夏凯伦)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhe Yin (闳哲)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mingchao Zhang (张明超)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiaoping Liang (梁晓平)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yingying Zhang (张莹莹)
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Organic Optoelectronics and Molecular Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Department of ChemistryTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Center for Nano and Micro MechanicsTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations