A Critical Review of Learning Environment Policy Discourse in Aotearoa New Zealand

Abstract

The Ministry of Education is funding a significant building programme for primary and secondary classrooms across Aotearoa, New Zealand. In New Zealand there is an expectation that new or refurbished classrooms will be innovative, modern or flexible learning environments. This paper reports findings from a critical policy analysis of the discourse within Ministry of Education documents focusing on the design of learning environments published 2010–2019. Using a ‘what’s the problem’ approach (Bacchi in Women, policy and politics: the construction of policy problems, Sage, London, 1999), we examine the representation of the ‘problems’ which the policy documents relating to modern learning environments intend to address. We use an eight-stage process of analysis of these documents in order to identify policy priorities, ideologies, assumptions and potential outcomes in order to see how these are used to justify authority and action. This analysis revealed two larger ‘problems’ and a number of subthemes underpinning these documents. We suggest that the construction of these problems has conflated many aspects of both space and teaching and learning and relied on unquestioned assumptions about ‘modern’ learning and collaborative teaching. We conclude by considering the implications of this policy direction for New Zealand’s education system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Bacchi, C. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing Policy: Whats the problem represented to be. Frenchs Forest: Pearsons Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policy analysis: A guide to practice. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ball, S. J., Bowe, R., & Gewirtz, S. (1996). School choice, social class and distinction: the realization of social advantage in education. Journal of Education Policy, 11(1), 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benade, L. (2015). The transformative educative prospects of flexible learning environments. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 12(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benade, L. (2017). The evolution of policy: A critical examination of school property under the National-led Government. Waikato Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v22i1.558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Biesta, G. (2016). The rediscovery of teaching: On robot vacuum cleaners, non-egological education and the limits of the hermeneutical world view. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(4), 374–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bullen, E., Fahey, J., & Kenway, J. (2006). The knowledge economy and innovation: Certain uncertainty and the risk economy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27(1), 53–86.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Byers, T., Mahat, M., Liu, K., Knock, A., & Imms, W. (2018). A systematic review of the effects of learning enviornments on student outcomes. https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/216293/iletc_Technical%20Report%204_2018.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.

  10. Cuban, L. (2009). Oversold and underused. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Access to quality teaching: An analysis of inequality in California’s public schools. Santa Clara L. Rev., 43, 1045.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harfitt, G. J. (2013). Why ‘small’ can be better: An exploration of the relationships between class size and pedagogical practices. Research Papers in Education, 28(3), 330–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hipkins, C. (2018). Towards a comprehensive reform of school property. Proposal presented to the chair of the cabinet social wellbeing committee.

  15. Hirschman, K., & Wood, B. E. (2019). 21st century learners: Changing conceptions of knowledge, learning and the child. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 23(2018), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy, K. (2008). Globalised economies and liberalised curriculum: New challenges for national citizenship education. In D. Grossman, W. On Lee, & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Citizenship curriculum in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 13–26). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lourie, M. (2020). Recontextualising twenty-first century learning in New Zealand education policy: The reframing of knowledge, skills and competencies. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 55(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-020-00158-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ministry of Education. (2010). Innovative learning environment assessment tool.

  20. Ministry of Education. (2011a). 10 year property plan. https://education.govt.nz/school/property-and-transport/property-planning/10ypp/.

  21. Ministry of Education. (2011b). The New Zealand school property strategy 2011–2021. http://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Primary-Secondary/Property/SchoolPropertyStrategy201121.pdf.

  22. Ministry of Education. (2015). Designing schools in New Zealand. Requirements and guidelines. https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Primary-Secondary/Property/Design/Design-guidance/DSNZ-version-1-0-20151014.pdf.

  23. Ministry of Education. (2016a). Designing quality learning spaces: Acoustics. https://education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Primary-Secondary/Property/Design/Flexible-learning-spaces/DQLSOverviewAcousticsV2-0.pdf.

  24. Ministry of Education. (2016b). Flexible learning spaces: How the design of spaces can help student achievement. Factsheet. https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Primary-Secondary/Property/Design/Flexible-learning-spaces/FLS-How-the-design-of-spaces-can-help-student-achievement.pdf.

  25. Ministry of Education. (2016c). Flexible learning spaces: Making spaces work for everyone Factsheet. https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Primary-Secondary/Property/Design/Flexible-learning-spaces/FLS-Making-spaces-work-for-everyone.pdf.

  26. Ministry of Education. (2019a). Plan and build a new teaching space. www.education.govt.nz/school/funding-and-financials/funding/teaching-space-funding/plan-and-build-a-new-teaching-space/.

  27. Ministry of Education. (2019b). Summary of Education Portfolio Budget 2019 initiatives. https://www.education.govt.nz/our-work/publications/budget-2019/summary-of-education-portfolio-budget-2019-initiatives/.

  28. Ministry of Education. (2020). Education.Govt.nz. Retrieved from https://www.education.govt.nz/.

  29. Ministry of Education. (nd). Building a school from start to finish. https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Ministry/Budgets/Budget2019/NEGP/BuildingaSchool.pdf.

  30. OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  31. OECD. (2008). Innovating to learn: Learning to innovate. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  32. OECD. (2013). Innovative learning. Environments educational research and innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  33. OECD. (2017). The OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wall, G. (2016a). The impact of physical design on student outcomes. Ministry of Education http://www.educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/.

  35. Wall, G. (2016b). Māui whakakau, kura whakakau: The impact of physical design on Māori and Pasifika student outcomes. Ministry of Education. http://www.educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/.

  36. Watson, K., Handal, B., Maher, M., & McGinty, E. (2013). Ministry of Education Globalising the class size debate: Myths and realities. Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 2, 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wood, B. E., Thrupp, M., & Barker, M. (2020). Education policy: Changes and continuities since 1999. In G. Hassall & G. Keracaoglu (Eds.), Social policy in Aotearoa (pp. 272–285). Palmerston North: Massey University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wylie, C. (2012). Vital connections: Why we need more than self-managing schools. Wellington: NZCER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. York-Barr, J., Ghere, G., & Sommerness, J. (2007). Collaborative teaching to increase ELL student learning: A three-year urban elementary case study. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 301–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise Starkey.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 Selected documents relating to documents about learning environments and school property (2010–2019)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Starkey, L., Wood, B.E. A Critical Review of Learning Environment Policy Discourse in Aotearoa New Zealand. NZ J Educ Stud (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-020-00189-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Learning environments
  • Innovative
  • Education policy
  • Problem representation
  • Classroom design