The Use of Furniture in a Student-Centred Primary School Learning Environment

Abstract

Classroom furniture has evolved over time from fixed desks facing the front to maintain order and control to a range of flexible furniture types to encourage student-centred pedagogies. This article reports research that applied a socio-material approach to explore how furniture is used in a flexible learning environment. Data were gathered from observations, reflections, student focus group interviews and teacher interviews in one school in New Zealand. In this context it was found that students used furniture for different purposes. Individual student preferences and differences were evident including unconventional use of furniture. The use of furniture was influenced by the teachers, students, environment, furniture design and the curriculum, and mediated by pedagogy and a focus on developing autonomy and environmental competence. The students demonstrated environmental competence, including awareness of the ways that the available furniture can be used for different types of curriculum activities and how environmental and social conditions can affect comfort, collaboration and concentration levels. In classrooms where students move around the space, environmental competence should be deliberately embedded in the teaching programme implicitly and explicitly. In this context, the teachers controlled the environment and the students had restricted autonomy over their use of furniture. The notion of student-centredness in contemporary classroom environments requires further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Berchuck, I., & Tauss, V. (1973). Opening classroom: guiding the transition from traditional to open classroom. Elementary School Journal, 74, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1086/460803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Binboğa, E., & Korhan, O. (2014). Posture, musculoskeletal activities, and possible musculoskeletal discomfort among children using laptops or tablet computers for educational purposes: A literature review. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 23(5), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9505-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brunelli, M., & Meda, J. (2017). Gymnastics between school desks. History of Education Review, 46(2), 178–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cardon, G., De Clercq, D., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Breithecker, D. (2004). Sitting habits in elementary schoolchildren: A traditional versus a “Moving school.” Patient Education and Counseling, 54(2), 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charteris, J., Smardon, D., & Nelson, E. (2017). Innovative learning environments and new materialism: A conjunctural analysis of pedagogic spaces. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 49(8), 808–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1298035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. da Silva, L. B., Eliza, J., Coutinho, A. S., Soares, E. V. G., de Lourdes Silva dos Santos, R., Jacobs, K., & Soares, M. M. (2012). Analysis on the relationship between the school furniture and the work surface lighting and the body posture of public Middle School students from João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil. Work, 41, 5540–5542.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deed, C., & Lesko, T. (2015). ‘Unwalling’the classroom: Teacher reaction and adaptation. Learning Environments Research, 18(2), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dyson, S. M., Abuateya, H., Atkin, K., Culley, L., Dyson, S. E., & Rowley, D. (2010). Reported school experiences of young people living with sickle cell disorder in England. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2015). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Materialities, textures and pedagogies: Socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia, J. J., Huang, T., Trowbridge, M., Weltman, A., Sirard, J., Garcia, J. M., . . . Sirard, J. R. (2016). Comparison of the Effects of Stable and Dynamic Furniture on Physical Activity and Learning in Children. Journal of Primary Prevention, 37(6), 555-560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-016-0451-6

  12. Hageman, H. A. (1935). Streamlined schoolhouses wanted by newton planner. Journal of Education, 118(15), 425–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herman, F., Van Gorp, A., Simon, F., & Depaepe, M. (2011). The school desk: From concept to object. History of Education, 40(1), 97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Lancaster, S. L., Okely, A. D., & Parrish, A.-M. (2018). Perceived interplay between flexible learning spaces and teaching, learning and student wellbeing. Learning Environments Research, 21(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9254-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Knight, G., & Noyes, J. (1999). Children’s behaviour and the design of school furniture. Ergonomics, 42(5), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Le Garde, E. (1911). Proper school furniture for the child. Journal of Education, 74(1), 11–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. OECD. (2013). Innovative learning environments. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  19. OECD. (2015). Schooling redesigned: Towards innovative learning systems. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O’Hare, M. (1998). Classroom design for discussion-based teaching. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 17(4), 706–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Panagiotopoulou, G., Christoulas, K., Papanckolaou, A., & Mandroukas, K. (2004). Classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric measures in primary school. Applied Ergonomics, 35(2), 121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.

  23. Saarni, L., Nygård, C. H., Kaukiainen, A., & Rimpelä, A. (2007). Are the desks and chairs at school appropriate? Ergonomics, 50(10), 1561–1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701587368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sommer, R. (1977). Classroom layout. Journal of theory into practice., 16(3), 174–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Starkey, L. (2012). Teaching and learning in the digital age. Londone: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Starkey, L. (2019). Three dimensions of student-centred education: A framework for policy and practice. Critical Studies in Education, 60(3), 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stewart, S. C., Evans, W. H., & Kaczynski, D. J. (1997). Setting the stage for success: Assessing the instructional environment. Preventing School Failure, 41, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459889709603268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tormey, T. J. (1942). Furniture and equipment for school buildings. Review of Educational Research, 12, 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise Starkey.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Starkey, L., Leggett, V., Anslow, C. et al. The Use of Furniture in a Student-Centred Primary School Learning Environment. NZ J Educ Stud (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-020-00187-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Furniture
  • Student-centred
  • Primary school
  • Flexible learning environment
  • Environmental competence