Over recent years, researchers have paid increasing attention to the built environment of universities. In this article we extend these studies through a consideration of the spatial experiences of particular users: doctoral students. Examining data from a qualitative study conducted in Aotearoa New Zealand, we argue that doctoral students ‘read’ the power relations of campus space. In interviews and written diaries, doctoral researchers connected the current ordering of space to the expansion of neoliberalism within universities, describing how this shaped their study conditions. At the same time, students detailed the various ways in which they sought to re-negotiate these conditions. This article represents an initial exploration of the significance of offices as meaningful learning spaces for doctoral students. We conclude by drawing out implications for university decision-makers and also suggest avenues for further research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Angervall, P., & Silfver, E. (2019). Assembling lines in research education: Challenges, choices and resistance among Swedish doctoral students. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education,10(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-03-2019-0028.
Barnacle, R. (2016). New frontiers: Exploring the space/s of higher education. Higher Education Research and Development,35(1), 1–3.
Beckers, R., van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2015). A conceptual framework to identify spatial implications of new ways of learning in higher education. Facilities,33(1–2), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2013-0013.
Belk, R., & Watson, J. (1998). Material culture and the extended or unextended self in our university offices. Advances in Consumer Research,25(1), 305–310.
Benade, L. (2019). Flexible learning spaces: Inclusive by design? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies,54(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00127-2.
Burford, J. (2015). Queerying the affective politics of doctoral education: Toward complex visions of agency and affect. Higher Education Research & Development,34(4), 776–787.
Burford, J. (2016). Uneasy feelings: Queer(y)ing the affective-politics of doctoral education. (PhD Thesis). University of Auckland, Auckland. https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/31268
Burford, J. (2017a). Not writing, and giving ‘zero-f**ks’ about it: Queer(y)ing doctoral ‘failure’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,38(4), 473–484.
Burford, J. (2017b). Conceptualising doctoral writing as an affective-political practice. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,12, 17–32.
Burford, J. (2018). The trouble with doctoral aspiration now. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,31(6), 487–503.
Burford, J., & Hook, G. (2019). Curating care-full spaces: Doctoral students negotiating study from home. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1657805.
Card, P., & Thomas, H. (2018). Student housing as a learning space. Journal of Geography in Higher Education,42(4), 573–587.
Christie, H. (2007). Higher education and spatial (Im)mobility: Nontraditional students and living at home. Environment and Planning A,39(10), 2445–2463.
Curtis, B. (2016). The Performance-based research fund, gender and a cultural cringe. Globalisation, Societies and Education,14(1), 87–109.
Dikec, M. (2012). Space as a mode of political thinking. Geoforum,43, 669–676.
Dowling, R., & Mantai, L. (2017). Placing researcher identifications: Labs, offices and homes in the PhD. Area,49(2), 200–207.
El-Said, O. A., & Fathy, E. A. (2015). Assessing university students’ satisfaction with on-campus cafeteria services. Tourism Management Perspectives,16, 318–324.
Fitzpatrick, E., & Alansari, M. (2018). Creating a warmth against the chill: Poetry for the doctoral body. Art/Research International,3(1), 206–228.
Flyvbjerg and Richardson. (2002). Planning and Foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 44–62). London and New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Gulson, K., & Symes, C. (2007). Knowing one’s place: Educational theory, policy and the spatial turn. In K. Gulson & C. Symes (Eds.), Spatial theories of education: Policy and geography matters (pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge.
Harré, N., Grant, B., Locke, K., & Sturm, S. (2017). The university as an infinite game: Revitalising activism in the academy. Australian Universities’ Review,59(2), 5–13.
Hopwood, N., & Paulson, J. (2012). Bodies in narratives of doctoral students’ learning and experience. Studies in Higher Education,27(6), 667–681.
Kelly, F. (2016). The idea of the PhD: The doctorate in the twenty-first century imagination. New York: Routledge.
Lee, A., & Aitchison, C. (2009). Writing for the doctorate and beyond. In D. Bound & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 87–99). London: Routledge.
Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford, Cambridge
Locke, K. (2015). Activating built pedagogy: A genealogical exploration of educational space at the University of Auckland Epsom Campus and Business School. Educational Philosophy and Theory,47(6), 596–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.964159.
Metcalfe, A. S. (2009). The geography of access and excellence: Spatial diversity in higher education system design. Higher Education,58, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9191-8.
Moss, D. (2004). Creating space for learning: Conceptualizing women and higher education through space and time. Gender and Education,16(3), 283–302.
Neary, M. (2015). Making it with the university of the future: Pleasure and pedagogy in higher and higher education. Paper presented at Centre for Higher Education Research and Evaluation Events, University of Lancaster, 29th April, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/doc_library/edres/15seminars/neary(paper)29.4.15.pdf
New Zealand Ministry of Education, (2015). Profile and trends: New Zealand’ tertiary education research 2014. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/169336/2014-profileAndTrends-research.pdf
New Zealand Ministry of Education, (2018). Statistics relating to students enrolled in tertiary education providers by a range of demographic and other characteristics. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/statistics/tertiary-education/participation
Nordquist, J., Sundberg, K., & Laing, A. (2016). Aligning physical learning spaces with the curriculum: AMEE Guide No. 107. Medical Teacher,38(8), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2016.1147541.
Nordquist, J., & Watter, M. (2017). Participatory design beyond borders. European Journal of Education: Research, Development and Policy,52(3), 327–335.
Pløger, J. (2008). Foucault’s dispositif and the city. Planning Theory,7(1), 51–70.
Roberts, P. (2007). Neoliberalism, performativity and research. Review of Education,53, 349–365.
Roberts, P. (2009). A New Patriotism? Neoliberalism, citizenship and tertiary education in New Zealand. Educational Philosophy and Theory,41(4), 410–423.
Shore, C., & Taitz, M. (2012). Who ‘owns’ the university? Institutional autonomy and academic freedom in an age of knowledge capitalism. Globalisation, Societies and Education,10(2), 201–219.
Soja, E. (2008). Taking space personally. In B. Warf & S. Arias (Eds.), The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 11–35). London: Routledge.
Spowart, L., & Nairn, K. (2014). (Re)performing emotions in diary-interviews. Qualitative Research,14(3), 327–340.
Sturm, S., & Turner, S. (2011). “Built Pedagogy”: The University of Auckland Business School as Crystal Palace. Interstices: Journal of Architecture and Related Arts,12, 23–34.
Sturm, S., & Turner, S. (2012). Cardinal Newman in the crystal palace: The idea of the University today. Workplace,20, 58–68.
Tally, R. (2013). The spatial turn. Spatiality. New York: Routledge.
Temple, P. (2014). Preface. In The Physical University: Contours of Space and Place in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Tor, D. (2015). Exploring physical environment as hidden curriculum in higher education: A grounded theory study (PhD Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12618639/index.pdf
Whitton, P. (2018). The new university: Space, place and identity (PhD Thesis). Manchester Metropolitan University. Retrieved from http://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/620806/
Youdell, D. (2011). School trouble: Identity, power and politics in education. Oxon: Routledge.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Promsaka Na Sakonnakron, S., Burford, J. Doctoral Students’ Readings of the Politics of University Office Space. NZ J Educ Stud 55, 165–180 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00149-w
- Doctoral education