Abstract
Catholic Studies is a religious education course used in senior high schools in New South Wales, Australia. The course is not counted for university entrance but meets the requirement for students to undertake religious study whilst in catholic schools. This paper examines the perceptions of teachers on why students take the course and what parts of it they find most and least engaging. In addition, the perceptions of teachers about the course are also reported. The results are discussed in the context of the wider literature of effective teacher student engagement. It argues that two aspects of effective teaching are the capacity of teachers to deal with the content of a course and also the ability to understand and engage with the learning needs of students. One conclusion is that for teacher and student learning in Catholic Studies to be improved, more focused support for teachers needs to be provided. This support would include specialized classroom resources as well as the opportunity for teachers to engage with their peers in a supportive learning community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Berg, B. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Carr, E., & Worth, A. (2001). The use of the telephone interview for research. Nursing Times Research, 6(1), 511–524.
Cook, T. (2000). The next generation: A study of Catholic high school religion teachers. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 4(1), 115–121.
Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, D., Schoenfeld, A., Stage, E., & Zimmerman, T. (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
De Leeuw, D. & van der Zouwen, J. (2001). Data quality in telephone and face-to-face surveys: A comparative meta-analysis. In R. M. Groves, P. Biemer, L. Lybert, J. T. Massey, W. L. Nicholls & J. Waksberg (Eds.), Wiley series in survey methodology: Telephone survey methodology (pp. 283–299). New York: Wiley.
Dowling, E. (2012). An investment in our future: Reimaging professional learning for religious education. Religious Education Journal of Australia, 28(1), 23–30.
English, G. (2002). The professional development of Australian religious educators over the fifty years since the Journal of Religious Education began. Journal of Religious Education, 50(2), 22–30.
Gillham, B. (2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London: Routledge.
Healy, H. (2006). Leadership for learning in religious education. In R. Rymarz (Ed.), Leadership in religious education (pp. 135–151). New York: St Paul Publications.
Hopkins, D., Harris, A., West, M., Aincow, M., & Beresford, J. (1997). Creating the conditions for classroom improvement. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Jackson, R & O’Grady, K. (2007). Religions and education in England. Historical roots, cultural context and recent developments. In R. Jackson, S. Miedema, W. Weisse & J. P. Willaime (Eds.), Religion and education in Europe: Developments, contexts and debates. Munster: Waxmann.
Rossiter, G. (2017). A personal, critical perspective on the development of Australian Catholic School Religious Education: Where to from here? In R. Rymarz & A. Belmonte (Eds.), Religious education in Australian Catholic School (pp. 2–17). John Garrett: Mulgrave.
Rymarz, R. (2004). A suggested pedagogy for hard topics in religious education. Journal of Religious Education, 52(4), 31–36.
Rymarz, R. (2012). Teaching ethics and religious culture in Quebec high schools: An overview, contextualization and some analytical comments. Religious Education, 107(3), 295–310.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 5(2), 4–14.
Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: Wiley.
Wenner, J., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership a review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Starkey, J., Rymarz, R. Teaching catholic studies: a study of religious education in senior high school. j. relig. educ. 66, 65–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-018-0057-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-018-0057-9