Eurasian Economic Review

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 73–92 | Cite as

A new evidence from the effects of Russia’s WTO accession on its foreign trade

Original Paper
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effects of Russia’s WTO accession on Russia’s foreign trade policy with top 40 trading partners. The paper conducts a panel data estimation based on a gravity model for bilateral trade patterns in agricultural and industrial commodities between Russia and 40 trading partners during two separate periods: 2000–2011 and 2012–2015. The paper arrives at two key conclusions. First, economic size, trade remoteness and bilateral exchange rate have a stronger effect on the agricultural trade flows between Russia and its trading partners before the WTO accession of Russia, while economic size, trade remoteness and trade openness show a stronger impact on agricultural trade flows after Russia’s accession to the WTO. Second, economic size, trade remoteness and bilateral exchange rate have a stronger effect on the industrial trade flows between Russia and its top trading partners before the WTO accession, while economic size, trade remoteness and trade openness show a stronger impact on industrial trade flows after the accession. To the best of the author's knowledge, no study has looked at the Russia’s foreign trade with its top trading partners before and after WTO accession of Russia.

Keywords

Trade policy The WTO accession Russia Gravity model FMOLS 

JEL Classification

C33 F10 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful remarks. This article was prepared within the framework of the project РФФИ №17-02-00688 entitled “Transformation of Russian Foreign Economic Policy in a Changing Geopolitics”.

References

  1. Abeysinghe, T. (2001). Estimation of direct and indirect impact of oil price on growth. Economics Letters, 73(2), 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. E., & Wincoop, E. V. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. The American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aslund, A. (2007). Russia’s accession to the world trade organization. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 48(3), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babetskaia-Kukharchuk, O., & Maurel, M. (2004). Russia’s accession to the WTO: The potential for trade increase. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), 680–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berryman, J. (2000). Russia and the illicit arms trade. Crime Law and Social Change, 33(1), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Econometric Studies, 47, 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brun, J.F. et al. (2002). Has distance died? Evidence from a panel gravity model. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 3500. Centre for Economic Policy Resrearch, London.Google Scholar
  9. Buryukova, O. V. (2014). Russian knowledge-intensive services in international trade. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 25(1), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CEPII. (2015). GeoDist database. http://www.cepii.fr/cepii/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=6. Accessed 16 Dec 2016.
  11. Deardorff, A.V. (1998). Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In The regionalization of the world economy. University of Chicago Press, pp. 7–32.Google Scholar
  12. Elmorsy, S. S. (2015). Determinants of trade intensity of Egypt with COMESA countries. Journal of Global South, 2(5), 1–25.Google Scholar
  13. Fidrmuc, J. (2009). Gravity models in integrated panels. Empirical Economics, 37, 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fung, A. (2014). International business strategies: A review and extension of theories. The Chinese Economy, 47(5–6), 116–130.Google Scholar
  15. Gubaidullina, T., & Yakupov, A. (2015). Export potential of the Russian regions in the context of WTO accession. International conference on applied economics (pp. 274–279). Kazan: Elsevier B.V.Google Scholar
  16. Idrisov, G., Ponomarev, Y., & Sinelnikov-Murylev, S. (2016). Terms of trade and Russian economic development. Russian Journal of Economics, 2(3), 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IMF. (2015). The world economic outlook database. http://www.imf.org/en/Data. Accessed 13 Dec 2015.
  18. Ivanenko, V. (2004). Access to liquidity and non-monetary trade in Russia. Post-Communist Economies, 16(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iwasaki, I. & Suganuma, K. (2013). A gravity model of russian trade: The role of foreign direct investment and socio-cultural similarity, Tokyo, Japan. http://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/rs/bitstream/10086/25826/1/RRC_WP_No40.pdf.
  20. Kao, C., & Chiang, M. (2000). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Advance in Econometrics, 15(1), 179–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khairullov, D. (2015). Challenges of sustainable development of regional economy in the conditions of Russia’s accession to the world trade organization. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23(1), 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Konno, Y. (2016). Evaluating Russia’s trade patterns. Post-Communist Economies, 28(3), 300–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kwaku Afesorgbor, S. (2017). Revisiting the effect of regional integration on African trade: Evidence from meta-analysis and gravity model. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 26(2), 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leibman, B. (2016). Does the WTO government procurement agreement influence steel imports? Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 15(2/3), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu, X., & Xin, X. (2011). Transportation uncertainty and international trade. Transport Policy, 18, 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lundahl, M. (1984). Economic effects of a trade and investment boycott against South Africa. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86(1), 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malle, S. (2013). Economic modernisation and diversification in Russia. Constraints and challenges. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 4(1), 78–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mau, V., & Ulykaev, A. (2015). Global crisis and challenges for Russian economic development. Russian Journal of Economics, 1(1), 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mazhikeyev, A., Edwards, H., & Rizov, M. (2015). Openness and isolation: The trade performance of the former Soviet Central Asian countries. International Business Review, 24(6), 935–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nasre Esfahani, M., & Rasoulinezhad, E. (2016). Will be there new CO2 emitters in the future? Evidence of long-run panel co-integration for N-11 countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6(3), 463–470.Google Scholar
  31. Novy, D. (2013). International trade without CES: Estimating transloggravity. The Journal of International Economics, 89, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pedroni, P. (1996). Fully Modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels and the case of purchasing power parity, Department of Economics Working Paper, No. 96-020. Indiana University, Indiana.Google Scholar
  33. Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Review Economics Statistics, 83, 727–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CWPE Working Paper, No. 435, Cambridge University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  36. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Popa, D. (2012). The impact of the Doha round on the Russian Federation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3(1), 968–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Popova, L., & Rasoulinezhad, E. (2016). Have sanctions modified Iran’s trade policy? An evidence of Asianization and De-Europeanization through the gravity model. Economies, 4(4), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prusa, T. J. (2015). The WTO at 20: An economist’s perspective. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 14(3), 126–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rasoulinezhad, E. (2016). Investigation of sanctions and oil price effects on the Iran–Russia trade by using the gravity model. Vestnik of St Petersburg University, Series 5 (Economics), 2, 68–84.Google Scholar
  41. Rasoulinezhad, E. (2017). China’s foreign trade policy with OPEC member countries. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Policy, 10(1), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rasoulinezhad, E., & Kang, G. S. (2016). A panel data analysis of South Korea’ s trade with OPEC member countries: The gravity model approach 2. South Korea-OPEC trade pattern. Iranian Economic Review, 20(2), 203–224.Google Scholar
  43. Redding, S., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Economic geography and international inequality. The Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rutherford, T. F., & Tarr, D. G. (2008). Poverty effects of Russia’s WTO accession: Modeling “real” households with endogenous productivity effects. Journal of International Economics, 75(1), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saboori, B., Rasoulinezhad, E., & Sung, J. (2017). The nexus of oil consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in China, Japan and South Korea. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(8), 7436–7455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schierhorn, F., et al. (2016). The dynamics of beef trade between Brazil and Russia and their environmental implications. Global Food Security, 11(1), 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sohn, C. H. (2005). Does the gravity model explain South Korea’s trade flows? Japanese Economic Review, 56(4), 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sutyrin, S.F. et al. (2012). Russia’s accession to the WTO: Major commitments, possible implications. http://www.intracen.org/uploadedFiles/RussiaWTOAccessionEnglish.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.
  49. Suvankulov, F. (2016). Revisiting national border effects in foreign trade in goods of Canadian provinces. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 25(8), 1045–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taghizadeh Hesary, F., Rasoulinezhad, E., & Kobayashi, Y. (2015). Oil price fluctuations and oil consuming sectors: An empirical analysis of Japan. ADBI Working Paper, No. 539. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  51. Taghizadeh Hesary, F., et al. (2013). An estimation of the impact of oil shocks on crude oil exporting economies and their trade partners. Frontiers of Economics in China, 8(4), 571–591.Google Scholar
  52. Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Yoshino, N., & Rasoulinezhad, E. (2017). Impact of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on the oil-consuming sectors of Japan. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 16(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Torkkeli, M., et al. (2009). Knowledge absorption in an emerging economy—the role of foreign investments and trade flows in Russia. International Journal of Business Excellence, 2(3/4), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ulengin, F., et al. (2015). Effects of quotas on Turkish foreign trade: A gravity model. Transport Policy, 38, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vertakova, Y., Plotnikov, V., & Culicov, M. (2015). The key factors, determining the industrial development of Russia under the conditions of membership in the WTO. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24(1), 743–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wegren, S. (2012). The impact of WTO accession on Russia’s agriculture. Post-Soviet Affairs, 28(3), 296–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). USA: Cengage Learning Publication.Google Scholar
  58. World Bank. (2015). World Development Indicators. World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org. Accessed 17 Jul 2015.
  59. Wyatt, T. (2014). The Russian Far East’s illegal timber trade: An organized crime? Crime Law and Social Change, 61(1), 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xuan Nguyen, D. (2016). Trade liberalization and export sophistication in Vietnam. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 25(8), 1071–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zakharova, L. (2016). Economic cooperation between Russia and North Korea: New goals and new approaches. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 7(2), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsState University of Saint PetersburgSaint PetersburgRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations