Advertisement

Eurasian Economic Review

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 297–309 | Cite as

Stickiness of employee expenses and implications for stock returns

Original Paper
  • 410 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes a new measure for operating inflexibility based on firms’ downside stickiness of expenditures on employees. Firms are affected not only by labor unions, but also by human capital risks that influence firms’ expected stock returns. The contribution of the current study is to show, in general, that expenditures on employees affect firms’ operating inflexibility and thus account for higher stock returns. This may well be the first paper to conduct time-series predictability tests of market returns for market operating leverage, and to find a positive interaction in and out of sample.

Keywords

Asset pricing Investment Capacity Wages 

JEL Classification

E22 E24 G12 

References

  1. Amihud, Y., & Hurvich, C. M. (2004). Predictive regressions: A reduced-bias estimation method. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39, 813–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armour, J., & Cumming, D. (2006). The legislative road to Silicon Valley. Oxford Economic Papers, 58(4), 596–635. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpl007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazdresch, S., Belo, F., & Lin, X. (2014). Labor hiring, investment and stock return predictability in the cross section. Journal of Political Economy, 122, 129–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, H. J., Kacperczyk, M., & Ortiz-Molina, H. (2011). Labor unions, operating flexibility, and the cost of equity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1, 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cirillo, V. (2014). Patterns of innovation and wage distribution. Do “innovative firms” pay higher wages? Evidence from Chile. Eurasian Business Review, 4(2), 181–206.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, T. E., & McCracken, M. W. (2001). Tests of forecast accuracy and encompassing for nested models. Journal of Econometrics, 105, 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, T. E., & McCracken, M. W. (2005). Evaluating direct multi-step forecasts. Econometric Reviews, 24, 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connolly, R. A., Hirsch, B. T., & Hirschey, M. (1986). Union rent seeking, intangible capital, and market value of the firm. Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 567–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, I., & Priestley, R. (2009). Time-varying risk premiums and the output gap. Rev Financial Stud, 22(7), 2801–2833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fama, E. F., & French, K. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 2, 427–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. (1973). Risk, return and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghysels, E., Santa-Clara, P., & Valkanov, R. (2005). There is a risk-return trade-off after all. Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 509–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inci, A. C. (2011). Capital investment, earnings, and annual stock returns: Causality relationships in China. Eurasian Economic Review, 1(2), 95–125.Google Scholar
  14. Jorgenson, D. W., & Griliches, Z. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. The Review of Economic Studies, 34, 249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kothari, S. P., & Shanken, J. (1997). Book-to-market, dividend yield, and expected market returns: A time-series analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 18, 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuehn, L. A., Petrosky-Nadeau, N., & Zhang, L. (2012). An equilibrium asset pricing model with labor market search (No. w17742). National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w17742.Google Scholar
  17. Lev, B. (1974). On the association between operating leverage and risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9, 627–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, H. G. (1986). Union relative wage effects. In O.C. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. II, pp. 1139–1181). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  19. McCracken, M. W. (2007). Asymptotics for out-of-sample tests of Granger causality. Journal of Econometrics, 140, 719–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Novy-Marx, R. (2011). Operating leverage. Review of Finance, 15, 103–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piva, M., & Vivarelli, M. (2005). Innovation and employment: Evidence from Italian microdata. Journal of Economics, 86(1), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pontiff, J., & Schall, L. D. (1998). Book-to-market ratios as predictors of market returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rangazas, P., & Mourmouras, A. (2013). Wage and fertility gaps in dual economies. Eurasian Economic Review, 3(1), 59–83.Google Scholar
  24. Schmalz, M. C. (2012). Managing human capital risk. Job Market Paper, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  25. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 48, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stickney, C. P., & McGee, V. E. (1982). Effective corporate tax rates the effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of accounting and public policy, 1(2), 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taussig, R. D., & Akron, S. (2016). Returns to scale, operating leverage, and expected stock returns. Eurasian Business Review. doi: 10.1007/s40821-016-0053-5 Google Scholar
  28. Zaremba, A. (2016). Is there a low-risk anomaly across countries? Eurasian Economic Review, 6(1), 45–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Business AdministrationAriel UniversityArielIsrael

Personalised recommendations