Determinants of outsourced internal audit function: a further analysis

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate how the board of directors, audit committee (AC), external auditor and management explain the outsourced internal audit function (IAF) practice. Although prior studies provide some insights into the determinants of IAF, we have little understanding of how their characteristics are associated with outsourced IAF. Using 767 observations from an emerging market, we find that board independence and AC accounting expertise are negatively associated with outsourced IAF. We also observe a positive association between board expertise, AC independence, CEO with accounting expertise, and the size of the external audit firm and outsourced IAF. Corroborating these findings, additional tests show that the type of outsourced IAF provider, either big4 or non-big4, plays a significant role in these associations. We also extend the recent literature on the governance role of an AC chair with accounting expertise and report that a chair with accounting expertise is associated with outsourced IAF if the provider is a big4 audit firm. These findings may serve a large number of stakeholders who are interested in audit practices in general and IAF practices in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the period preceding well known corporate scandals (e.g., Enron; WorldCom), most capital markets allowed companies to purchase IAF services from their external auditor. This is no longer permissible, and any outsourcing must be to a third party other than the external auditor.

  2. 2.

    We follow Baatwah et al. (2015) concerning why these two characteristics are chosen. For example, they noted that tenure and financial expertise can reflect other characteristics of the CEO, such as education, career background, and experience. Further, we believe these characteristics will influence the CEO’s decision in regard to outsourcing IAF because they may equip him/her with qualifications which undermine the expected benefits from in-house IAF. For example, the tenure of the CEO in the company will increase his/her knowledge and experience about business and operations, industry indicators, and most threats and opportunities surrounding the company. This knowledge and experience may motivate the CEO to hesitate in investing in IAF, and focus investment on the core-business process.

  3. 3.

    We observe 30 observations during the sample period co-sourcing the IAF. However, these observations do not disclose how many IAF activities are outsourced to external providers. Therefore, we consider these observations as in-house IAF. For robustness, we delete these observations and report quantitatively similar results. Further, we add these observations to our outsource IAF measure and find that all results are identical to the main results, except that board independence in the main model becomes insignificant.

  4. 4.

    We should note that the explanatory power of our model is higher than most prior evidence. For example, Abdolmohammadi (2013) reported that the included explantory varaibles explain 18% of outsourcing IAF decisions. Similarly, Abbott et al. (2007) reported 11% as the explantory power of their model. However, Carey et al. (2006) revealed higher explantory power, 44%, although we attribute this to the small sample of only 99 observations.

  5. 5.

    In untabulated results, we find that 10% of our sampled observations have IAF provided by big4 audit firms, whereas 46% use non-big4 audit firms.

  6. 6.

    We recognize that the literature (e.g., Cassell et al. 2013; Boone et al. 2010; Francis et al. 2013) found that second-tier non-big4 audit firms, especially Grant and BDO, provide high-quality audit. Thus, we replace the OUTIAFNBIG4 measure by a second-tier IAF provider (OUTIAFSCNDTIR) measure which equals 1 if the IAF provider is Grant or BDO, 0 otherwise. In the unreported results, we find that on average, 15% of sampled observations outsource their IAF to second-tier audit firms. We also find results consistent with those reported in columns 4 and 5, except that BODEXPT, ACACEXPT, and ACSZ are not significantly associated, and that BODSZ and ADFINEXPT are negatively associated with second-tier audit firms.

References

  1. Abbott, L. J., Daugherty, B., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2016). Internal audit quality and financial reporting quality: The joint importance of independence and competence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbott, L. J., & Parker, S. (2000). Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Rama, D. V. (2007). Corporate governance, audit quality, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Evidence from internal audit outsourcing. The Accounting Review, 82(4), 803–835.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abdolmohammadi, M. (2013). Correlates of co-sourcing/outsourcing of internal audit activities. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(3), 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Akra, M., Abdel-Qader, W., & Billah, M. (2016). Internal auditing in the Middle East and North Africa: A literature review. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 26, 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alhadab, M., & Clacher, I. (2018). The impact of audit quality on real and accrual earnings management around IPOs. British Accounting Review, 50(4), 442–461.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Qadasi, A., & Abidin, S. (2018). The effectiveness of internal corporate governance and audit quality: The role of ownership concentration—Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(2), 233–253.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Qadasi, A. A., Abidin, S., & Al-Jaifi, H. A. (2019). The puzzle of internal audit function budget toward specialist auditor choice and audit fees: Does family ownership matter? Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(2), 208–243.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Yahyaee, K., Pham, T., & Walter, T. (2010). Dividend stability in a unique environment. Managerial Finance, 36(10), 903–916.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson, D., Francis, J. R., & Stokes, D. J. (1993). Auditing, directorships and the demand for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 12(4), 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baatwah, S. R., Salleh, Z., & Ahmad, N. (2015). CEO characteristics and audit report timeliness: Do CEO tenure and financial expertise matter? Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(8/9), 998–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baatwah, S. R., Salleh, Z., & Stewart, J. (2019). Audit committee chair accounting expertise and audit report timeliness: The moderating effect of chair characteristics. Asian Review of Accounting, 27(2), 273–306.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baber, W. R., Liang, L., & Zhu, Z. (2012). Associations between internal and external corporate governance characteristics: Implications for investigating financial accounting restatements. Accounting Horizons, 26(2), 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., & Yang, J. S. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bamber, L. S., John, J., & Wang, I. Y. (2010). What’s my style? The influence of top managers on voluntary corporate financial disclosure. Accounting Review, 85(4), 1131–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barr-Pulliam, D. (2016). Engaging third parties for internal audit activities. https://www.iia.nl/SiteFiles/Downloads/IIARF%20CBOK%20Engaging%20Third%20Parties%20For%20IA%20Activities%20Jan%202016_0.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2018.

  18. Baydoun, N., Maguire, W., Ryan, N., & Willett, R. (2013). Corporate governance in five Arabian Gulf countries. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(1), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 65–122.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Beattie, V., Fearnley, S., & Hines, T. (2014). Boundary spanning and gatekeeping roles of UK audit committees. Accounting and Business Research, 44(3), 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Beisland, L. A., Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2015). Audit quality and corporate governance: Evidence from the microfinance industry. International Journal of Auditing, 19(3), 218–237.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ben Barka, H., & Legendre, F. (2017). Effect of the board of directors and the audit committee on firm performance: a panel data analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 21(3), 737–755.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Boone, J. P., Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2010). Do the Big 4 and the Second-tier firms provide audits of similar quality? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(4), 330–352.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Burton, F. G., Emett, S. A., Simon, C. A., & Wood, D. A. (2012). Corporate managers’ reliance on internal auditor recommendations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(2), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Caplan, D. H., & Kirschenheiter, M. (2000). Outsourcing and audit risk for internal audit services. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(3), 387–428.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 653–676.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Carey, P., Simnett, R., & Tanewski, G. (2000). Voluntary demand for internal and external auditing by family businesses. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(s-1), 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Carey, P., Subramaniam, N., & Ching, K. C. W. (2006). Internal audit outsourcing in Australia. Accounting and Finance, 46(1), 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cassell, C. A., Giroux, G., Myers, L. A., & Omer, T. C. (2013). The emergence of second-tier auditors in the US: Evidence from investor perceptions of financial reporting credibility. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 40(3–4), 350–372.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chi, W., Huang, H., Liao, Y., & Xie, H. (2009). Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit quality, and market perception: Evidence from Taiwan. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(2), 359–391.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chin, C.-L., & Chi, H.-Y. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729–765.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Choi, A., & Kong, H. (2018). The joint effect of audit quality and legal regimes on the use of real earnings management: International evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(4), 2225–2257.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen, J. R., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2004). The corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23(1), 87–152.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., & Taylor, S. L. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 20(3), 297–322.

  38. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  39. DeFond, M. L., Hann, R. N., & Xuesong, H. U. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), 153–193.

    Google Scholar 

  40. DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Desai, N. K., Gerard, G. J., & Tripathy, A. (2011). Internal audit sourcing arrangements and reliance by external auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(1), 149–171.

    Google Scholar 

  42. DeSimone, S. M., & Abdolmohammadi, M. (2016). Correlates of external quality assessment and improvement programs in internal auditing: A study of 68 countries. Journal of International Accounting Research, 15(2), 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dhaliwal, D. A. N., Naiker, V. I. C., & Navissi, F. (2010). The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 787–827.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ege, M. S. (2015). Does internal audit function quality deter management misconduct? The Accounting Review, 90(2), 495–527.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Endrawes, M., Feng, Z., Lu, M., & Shan, Y. (2018). Audit committee characteristics and financial statement comparability. Accounting & Finance. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acfi.12354.

  46. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Feng, M., Ge, W., Luo, S., & Shevlin, T. (2011). Why do CFOs become involved in material accounting manipulations? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1–2), 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Francis, J., Huang, A. H., Rajgopal, S., & Zang, A. Y. (2008). CEO reputation and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 109–147.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Francis, J. R., Michas, P. N., & Yu, M. D. (2013). Office size of big 4 auditors and client restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1626–1661.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ghafran, C., & O’Sullivan, N. (2017). The impact of audit committee expertise on audit quality: Evidence from UK audit fees. British Accounting Review, 49(6), 578–593.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Glover, S. M., Prawitt, D. F., & Wood, D. A. (2008). Internal audit sourcing arrangement and the external auditor’s reliance decision. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Goh, B. W. (2009). Audit committees, boards of directors, and remediation of material weaknesses in internal control. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(2), 549–579.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Goodwin-Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2006). Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit. Accounting & Finance, 46(3), 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gul, F. A., Fung, S. Y. K., & Jaggi, B. (2009). Earnings quality: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and auditors’ industry expertise. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 47(3), 265–287.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hawkamah and Capital Market Authority of the Sultanate of Oman announce corporate governance partnership. (2006). International Financial Centre. http://www.hawkamah.org/news. Accessed 6 M 2011.

  58. Hazarika, S., Karpoff, J. M., & Nahata, R. (2012). Internal corporate governance, CEO turnover, and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(1), 44–69.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hu, G., Yuan, R., & Xiao, J. Z. (2017). Can independent directors improve internal control quality in China? The European Journal of Finance, 23(7–9), 626–647.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2006). A global summary of the common body of knowledge (CBOK). https://na.theiia.org/iiarf/Public%20Documents/A%20Global%20Summary%20of%20the%20Common%20Body%20of%20Knowledge%202006.pdf. Accessed 2 Sep 2014.

  62. Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509.

    Google Scholar 

  63. James, K. L. (2003). The effects of internal audit structure on perceived financial statement fraud prevention. Accounting Horizons, 17(4), 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jiang, J., Petroni, K. R., & Wang, Y. I. (2010). CFOs and CEOs: Who have the most influence on earnings management? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(3), 513–526.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Jiang, F., Zhu, B., & Huang, J. (2013). CEO’s financial experience and earnings management. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 23(3), 134–145.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Johnson, E., Khurana, I. K., & Reynolds, J. K. (2002). Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 637–660.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Johnstone, K., Li, C., & Rupley, K. H. (2011). Changes in corporate governance associated with the revelation of internal control material weaknesses and their subsequent remediation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 331–383.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kapoor, N., & Goel, S. (2017). Board characteristics, firm profitability and earnings Management: Evidence from India. Australian Accounting Review, 27(2), 180–194.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kent, P., Routledge, J., & Stewart, J. (2010). Innate and discretionary accruals quality and corporate governance. Accounting & Finance, 50(1), 171–195.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375–400.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2008). Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors’ accounting expertise and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(3), 827–857.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., & Ping, Z. (2011). Can big 4 versus non-big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? Accounting Review, 86(1), 259–286.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lee, G., & Fargher, N. L. (2018). The role of the audit committee in their oversight of whistle-blowing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(1), 167–189.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lu, Y., & Cao, Y. (2018). The individual characteristics of board members and internal control weakness: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 51, 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Mubako, G. (2019). Internal audit outsourcing: A literature synthesis and future directions. Australian Accounting Review, 29(3), 532–545.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Munro, L., & Stewart, J. (2010). External auditors’ reliance on internal audit: The impact of sourcing arrangements and consulting activities. Accounting & Finance, 50(2), 371–387.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Prawitt, D. F., Sharp, N. Y., & Wood, D. A. (2012). Internal audit outsourcing and the risk of misleading or fraudulent financial reporting: Did Sarbanes-Oxley get it wrong? Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(4), 1109–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Prawitt, D. F., Smith, J. L., & Wood, D. A. (2009). Internal audit quality and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 84(4), 1255–1280.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Qi, B., Lin, J. W., Tian, G., & Lewis, H. C. X. (2018). The impact of top management team characteristics on the choice of earnings management strategies: Evidence from China. Accounting Horizons, 32(1), 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Raghunandan, K., Read, W. J., & Rama, D. V. (2001). Audit committee composition, “gray directors,” and interaction with internal auditing. Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Rittenberg, L., & Covaleski, M. A. (2001). Internalization versus externalization of the internal audit function: An examination of professional and organizational imperatives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7), 617–641.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Rönkkö, J., Paananen, M., & Vakkuri, J. (2018). Exploring the determinants of internal audit: Evidence from ownership structure. International Journal of Auditing, 22(1), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Roussy, M., & Perron, A. (2018). New perspectives in internal audit research: A structured literature review. Accounting Perspectives, 17(3), 345–385.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2002). The public company accounting reform and investor protection. Washington, DC: US Congress.

  86. Sarens, G., & Abdolmohammadi, M. J. (2011a). Factors associated with convergence of internal auditing practices: Emerging vs developed countries. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 1(2), 104–122.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Sarens, G., & Abdolmohammadi, M. J. (2011b). Monitoring effects of the internal audit function: Agency theory versus other explanatory variables. International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Schmidt, J., & Wilkins, M. S. (2013). Bringing darkness to light: The influence of auditor quality and audit committee expertise on the timeliness of financial statement restatement disclosures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Sharma, V., Naiker, V., & Lee, B. (2009). Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons, 23(3), 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2006). The use of internal audit by Australian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(1), 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Sun, J., Lan, G., & Liu, G. (2014). Independent audit committee characteristics and real earnings management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(2), 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Tanyi, P. N., & Smith, D. B. (2015). Busyness, expertise, and financial reporting quality of audit committee chairs and financial experts. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(2), 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Trotman, A. J., & Duncan, K. R. (2018). Internal audit quality: Insights from audit committee members, senior management, and internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(4), 235–259.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Turley, S., & Zaman, M. (2007). Audit committee effectiveness: informal processes and behavioural effects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(5), 765–788.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Vafeas, N. (2009). Is accounting education valued by the stock market? Evidence from corporate controller appointments. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(4), 1143–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (Eds.). (1986). Positive Accounting Theory (1st Edn). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Widener, S. K., & Selto, F. H. (1999). Management control systems and boundaries of the firm: Why do firms outsource internal auditing activities? Journal of Management Accounting Research, 11, 45–73.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Yatim, P., Kent, P., & Clarkson, P. (2006). Governance structures, ethnicity, and audit fees of Malaysian listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 757–782.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., & Zhou, N. (2007). Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(3), 300–327.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Rabea Baatwah.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baatwah, S.R., Al-Qadasi, A.A. Determinants of outsourced internal audit function: a further analysis. Eurasian Bus Rev 10, 629–659 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-019-00142-9

Download citation

Keywords:

  • Outsourced IAF
  • Board of directors
  • Audit committee
  • Management
  • External auditor
  • Emerging market

JEL Classification

  • M40
  • M42
  • M49