Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms by Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set and Majority Operator

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past few decades, many-objective evolutionary algorithms have been proposed and presented as competitive compared with state-of-the-art algorithms. The evaluation of these algorithms involves many performance metrics, considered as a multiple criteria decision-making problem. In order to fairly and faithfully evaluate these algorithms, a novel evaluation approach based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and majority operator is proposed. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set is used to express the opinions of experts, and majority operator is used to aggregate the opinions of experts. The framework for evaluation is presented, in which comprehensive performance metrics are proposed. An experimental study is designed to validate the proposed method. The experimental results indicate that the proposed approach is accurate and effective; the ability of algorithms to solve many-objective problems relies on both algorithms and the features of problems. Finally, the proposed method is used to evaluate the meteorological disaster that occurred in China in 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beg, I., Rashid, T.: TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 28(12), 1162–1171 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, R., Jin, Y.C., Olhofer, M., Sendhoff, B.: A reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 20(5), 773–791 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, S.M., Hong, J.A.: Multicriteria linguistic decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and the aggregation of fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 286, 63–74 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coello, C.A.C., Lamont, G.B., Van Veldhuizen, D.A.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Springer, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dai, C., Wang, Y.P.: A new decomposition based evolutionary algorithm with uniform designs for many-objective optimization. Appl. Soft Comput. 30, 238–248 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K., Jain, H.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, Part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(4), 577–601 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deb, K., Jain, S.: Running performance metrics for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. KanGAL Report No. 2002004. Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India (2002)

  8. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable test problems for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Adv. Inf. Knowl. Process. 105–145 (2005)

  10. Farhadinia, B., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Entropy measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets using the concept of interval-transformed hesitant fuzzy elements. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0379-x

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S.: Novel basic operational laws for linguistic terms, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and probabilistic linguistic term sets. Inf. Sci. 372, 407–427 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. He, Z.N., Yen, G.G.: Comparison of many-objective evolutionary algorithms using performance metrics ensemble. Adv. Eng. Softw. 76, 1–8 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hui, L., Qingfu, Z.: Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated Pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13(2), 284–302 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahraman, C., Onar, S.Ç., Öztayşi, B.: B2C marketplace prioritization using hesitant fuzzy linguistic AHP. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0429-4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, L.W., Chen, S.M.: Fuzzy decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic operators. Inf. Sci. 294, 513–529 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang, R.X., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y.: Projection-based promethee methods based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0418-7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liao, H.C., Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S.: A survey of decision making theory and methodologies of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 37(1), 35–48 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application in decision making: a state-of-the-art survey. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0432-9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J.: Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf. Sci. 271, 125–142 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23(5), 1343–1355 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J., Merigó, J.M.: Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowl. Based Syst. 76, 127–138 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, P., Wei, C.P.: A case-based reasoning decision-making model for hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0391-1

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, H.C., Rodríguez, R.M.: A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making. Inf. Sci. 258, 220–238 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, Y.P., Gong, D.W., Sun, X.Y., Zhang, Y.: Many-objective evolutionary optimization based on reference points. Appl. Soft Comput. 50, 344–355 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peláez, J.I., Doña, J.M.: Majority additive-ordered weighting averaging: a new neat ordered weighting averaging operator based on the majority process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 18(4), 469–481 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Rashid, T., Faizi, S., Xu, Z.S., Zafar, S.: Electre-based outranking method for multi-criteria decision making using hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic term sets. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0297-y

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 109–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun, R.X., Hu, J.H., Zhou, J.D., Chen, X.H.: A hesitant fuzzy linguistic projection-based mabac method for patients’ prioritization. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0345-7

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, H., Xu, Z.S.: Total orders of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: definitions, generations and applications. Knowl. Based Syst. 107, 142–154 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, J., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y., Chen, X.H.: Multi-criteria decision-making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: an outranking approach. Knowl. Based Syst. 86, 224–236 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, S., Li, M., Liu, X., Zheng, J.: A grid-based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 17(5), 721–736 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by China Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 71503134, 91546117, 71373131), Key Project of National Social and Scientific Fund Program (16ZDA047) and philosophy and Social Sciences in Universities of Jiangsu (Grant No. 2016SJB630016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaobing Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, X., Lu, Y. Evaluation of Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms by Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set and Majority Operator. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 2043–2056 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0488-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0488-1

Keywords

Navigation