Abstract
In the climate domain, attribution is the process of determining the external forcings which are more likely to be responsible of the climate change which, in turn, affects global economic growth. These factors influence the climatic system by altering its properties including, for instance, the radiative balance. In this context, investigating the role of anthropogenic forcings toward natural factors in the global warming of the last decades is of paramount importance. Global climate models (GCMs) applied to attribution studies showed that the temperature increase in the second half of the twentieth century can be mainly imputable to the emissions of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. In this study we resort to a data-driven approach based on machine learning with the aim of analyzing the relationship between global temperature anomalies and natural and anthropogenic forcings. Our empirical findings fully agree with the results of GCMs attribution studies, and further shed light on the natural and anthropogenic drivers that, on a multivariate basis, exert the major influence on the global temperature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2013). Granger causality analyses for climatic attribution. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 3, 515–522.
Bindoff, N.L., Stott, P. A., AchutaRao, K. M., Allen, M. R., Gillett, N., Gutzler, D., et al. (2013). Detection and attribution of climate change: From global to regional. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp. 867–952.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C. J., & Olshen, R. A. (1997). Classification and Regression Trees. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32.
Brohan, P., Kennedy, J. J., Harris, I., Tett, S. F. B., & Jones, P. D. (2006). Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: A new dataset from 1850. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D12106. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006548.
Brokamp, C., Jandarov, R., Rao, M. B., LeMasters, G., & Ryan, P. (2017). Exposure assessment models for elemental components of particulate matter in an urban environment: A comparison of regression and random forest approaches. Atmospheric Environment, 151, 1–11.
Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M., & Miguel, E. (2015). Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature, 527, 235–239.
Carleton, T. A., & Hsiang, S. M. (2016). Social and economic impacts of climate. Science, 353, aad9837.
Carslaw, K. S. (2009). Cosmic rays, clouds and climate. Nature, 460, 332–333.
Chrysafis, I., Mallinis, G., Gitas, I., & Tsakiri-Strati, M. (2017). Estimating Mediterranean forest parameters using multi seasonal Landsat 8 OLI imagery and an ensemble learning method. Remote Sensing of Environment, 199, 154–166.
Chylek, P., Klett, J. D., Lesins, G., Dubey, M. K., & Hengartner, N. (2014). The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation as a dominant factor of oceanic influence on climate. Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 1689–697.
de Almeida, B. A., & Mostafavi, A. (2016). Resilience of infrastructure systems to sea-level rise in coastal areas: impacts, adaptation measures, and implementation challenges. Sustainability, 8, 1–28.
Dell, M., Jones, B. F., & Olken, B. A. (2009). Temperature and income: Reconciling new cross-sectional and panel estimates. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 99, 198–204.
Easterbrook, D. J. (2016). Using patterns of recurring climate cycles to predict future climate changes. In Evidence-Based Climate Science, Second Edition, pp 395–411.
Hegerl, G. C., & Zwiers, F. W. (2011). Use of models in detection and attribution of climate change. Climate Change, 2, 570–591.
Hill, T., Marquez, L., O’Connor, M., & Remus, W. (1994). Artificial neural network models for forecasting and decision making. International Journal of Forecasting, 10, 5–15.
Hsiang, S., Kopp, R., Jina, A., Rising, J., Delgado, M., Mohan, S., et al. (2017). Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science, 365, 1362–1369.
Kampichler, C., & Sierdsema, H. (2017). On the usefulness of prediction intervals for local species distribution model forecasts. Ecological Informatics, (In press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.07.003.
Kang, Y., Khan, S., & Khan, X. (2009). Climate change impacts on crop yield, crop water productivity and food security—A review. Progress in Natural Science, 19, 1665–1674.
Korhonen, K. T., & Kangas, A. (1997). Application of nearest neighbour regression for generalizing sample tree information. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 12, 97–101.
Heal, G., & Park, J. (2016). Temperature stress and the direct impact of climate change: A review of an emerging literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10, 347–362.
Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J. R., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., & Basu, N., et al. (2017). The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. The Lancet, (In press). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0.
Mitchell, T. (1997). Machine Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pachauri, R. K., & Reisinger, A. (eds.) (2007). Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
Pasini, A., Lor, M., & Ameli, F. (2006). Neural network modelling for the analysis of forcings/temperatures relationships at different scales in the climate system. Ecological Modelling, 191, 58–67.
Pasini, A., Triacca, U., & Attansaio, A. (2015). On the role of sulfates in recent global warming: A Granger causality analysis. International Journal of Climatology, 35, 3701–3706.
Power, S. B., & Kociuba, G. (2011). The impact of global warming on the Southern Oscillation Index. Climate Dynamics, 37, 1745–1754.
Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81–106.
Schneider, N., & Cornuelle, B. D. (2005). The forcing of the pacific decadal oscillation. Journal of Climate, 18, 4355–4373.
Sloan, T., & Wolfendale, A. W. (2013a). Cosmic rays, solar activity and the climate. Environmental Research Letters, 8, 1–7.
Sloan, T., & Wolfendale, A. W. (2013b). Cosmic rays and climate change over the past 1000 million years. New Astronomy, 25, 45–49.
Smola, A. J., & Schölkopf, B. (2004). A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing, 14, 199–222.
Sokolik, I. N., & Toon, O. B. (1996). Direct radiative forcing by anthropogenic airborne mineral aerosols. Nature, 381, 681–683.
Soon, W., Connolly, R., & Connolly, M. (2015). Re-evaluating the role of solar variability on Northern Hemisphere temperature trends since the 19th century. Earth-Science Reviews, 150, 409–452.
Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Svensmark, H. (2000). Cosmic rays and earth’s climate. Space Science Review, 93, 155–166.
Tashman, L. J. (2000). Out-of-sample tests of forecasting accuracy: An analysis and review. International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 437–450.
Triacca, U., Attanasio, A., & Pasini, A. (2013). Anthropogenic global warming hypothesis: Testing its robustness by Granger causality analysis. Environmetrics, 24, 260–268.
Waldhoff, S. T., Anthoff, S., Rose, S., & Tol, S. (2011). The marginal damage costs of different greenhouse gases: An application of FUND. Economics, 8, 1–33.
Weyant, J. (2017). Some contributions of integrated assessment models of global climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11, 115–137.
Zhao, S., & Li, Y. (2013). A retrieval algorithm of fast aerosol optical thickness based on hyperion data. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Measurement, Information and Control, pp. 9–11.
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Antonello Pasini for providing us with the dataset and for the fruitful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orsenigo, C., Vercellis, C. Anthropogenic influence on global warming for effective cost-benefit analysis: a machine learning perspective. Econ Polit Ind 45, 425–442 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-018-0092-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-018-0092-2