Utilizing classic evolutionary algorithms to assess the Brown trout (Salmo trutta) habitats by ANFIS-based physical habitat model

Abstract

Present study evaluates the application of coupled evolutionary algorithm- adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in the Brown trout riverrine habitats. We implemented the proposed method in the Lar national park as one of the most important Brown trout habitats in the southern Caspian Sea basin. Two classic evolutionary algorithms including the genetic algorithm and the particle swarm optimization were coupled with adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Moreover, two conventional training methods including backpropagation and hybrid algorithm were utilized. Evaluation of developed models was carried out in two stages including assessment of habitat suitability index in observed habitats and using practical hydraulic simulation in a representative reach. Measurement indices consisting of root mean square error, mean absolute error, Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient, reliability and vulnerability indices and fuzzy technique of order preference similarity to the ideal solution as decision-making system were used. Results demonstrate the efficiency of the coupled evolutionary algorithm- adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system to simulate hydraulic habitats of the Brown trout. The first stage of evaluation indicates particle swarm optimization is the best method. However, practical hydraulic simulation corroborates GA is the best method for the training process. Evaluations demonstrate that backpropagation is not an appropriate method for ANFIS-based hydraulic habitat simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

References

  1. Abbaspour-Gilandeh M, Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y (2019) Modelling soil compaction of agricultural soils using fuzzy logic approach and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approaches. Model Earth Syst Environ 5(1):13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham A (2001) Neuro fuzzy systems: State-of-the-art modeling techniques. In: International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, p. 269–276. Berlin: Springer

  3. Ahmadi-Nedushan B, St-Hilaire A, Bérubé M, Robichaud É, Thiémonge N, Bobée B (2006) A review of statistical methods for the evaluation of aquatic habitat suitability for instream flow assessment. River Res Appl 22(5):503–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Awan JA, Bae DH (2014) Improving ANFIS based model for long-term dam inflow prediction by incorporating monthly rainfall forecasts. Water Resour Manage 28(5):1185–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barton GJ, Moran EH, Berenbrock C (2004) Surveying cross sections of the Kootenai River between Libby Dam, Montana, and Kootenay Lake, British Columbia, Canada (No. 2004–1045). US Geological Survey.

  6. Baruah A, Sarma AK (2020) Ecological flow assessment using hydrological and hydrodynamic routing model in Bhogdoi river India. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00982-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchanan TJ, Somers WP (1969) Discharge measurements at gaging stations techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehteram M, Karami H, Mousavi SF, El-Shafie A, Amini Z (2017) Optimizing dam and reservoirs operation based model utilizing shark algorithm approach. Knowl-Based Syst 122:26–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fukuda S (2011) Assessing the applicability of fuzzy neural networks for habitat preference evaluation of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Ecol Inform 6(5):286–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukuda S, De Baets B, Waegeman W, Verwaeren J, Mouton AM (2013) Habitat prediction and knowledge extraction for spawning European grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.) using a broad range of species distribution models. Environ Model Softw 47:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukuda S, Tanakura T, Hiramatsu K, Harada M (2015) Assessment of spatial habitat heterogeneity by coupling data-driven habitat suitability models with a 2D hydrodynamic model in small-scale streams. Ecol Inform 29:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gippel CJ, Stewardson MJ (1998) Use of wetted perimeter in defining minimum environmental flows. Regul Rivers Res Manag 14(1):53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta HV, Kling H (2011) On typical range, sensitivity, and normalization of Mean Squared Error and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency type metrics. Water Res Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hajiesmaeili M, Ayyoubzadeh SA, Sedighkia M, Kalbassi MR (2014) Physical habitat simulation of Rainbow trout in mountainous streams of Iran. J Bio Env Sci 5(4):497–503

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harby A, Baptist M, Dunbar MJ, Schmutz S (2004) State-of-the-art in data sampling, modelling analysis and applications of river habitat modelling: COST action 626 report (Doctoral dissertation, Univerza v Ljubljani, Naravoslovnotehniška fakulteta).

  17. Heddam S (2016) Simultaneous modelling and forecasting of hourly dissolved oxygen concentration (DO) using radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) based approach: a case study from the Klamath River, Oregon, USA. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(3):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hosseini-Moghari SM, Araghinejad S, Azarnivand A (2017) Drought forecasting using data-driven methods and an evolutionary algorithm. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(4):1675–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ighalo JO, Adeniyi AG, Marques G (2020) Artificial intelligence for surface water quality monitoring and assessment: a systematic literature analysis. Model Earth Syst Environ 1–13.

  20. Jang JS (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 23(3):665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jowett IG (1997) Instream flow methods: a comparison of approaches. Regul Rivers Res Manag 13(2):115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jung SH, Choi SU (2015) Prediction of composite suitability index for physical habitat simulations using the ANFIS method. Appl Soft Comput 34:502–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN'95-international conference on neural networks, vol. 4, p. 1942–1948. IEEE.

  24. Li X, Cheng X, Wu W, Wang Q, Tong Z, Zhang X et al (2020) Forecasting of bioaerosol concentration by a Back Propagation neural network model. Sci Total Environ 698:134315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lobbrecht AH, Dibike YB, Solomatine DP (2002) Applications of neural networks and fuzzy logic to integrated water management project report. IHE, Delft

  26. Noack M, Schneider M, Wieprecht S (2013) The habitat modelling system CASiMiR a multivariate fuzzy-approach and its applications. In: Ecohydraulics: an integrated approach, p75–91. Chichester: Wiley

  27. Papaioannou G, Papadaki C, Dimitriou E (2020) Sensitivity of habitat hydraulic model outputs to DTM and computational mesh resolution. Ecohydrology 13(2):e2182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Railsback SF (2016) Why it is time to put PHABSIM out to pasture. Fisheries 41(12):720–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sedighkia M, Ayyoubzadeh SA, Haji Esmaeili M (2017) Habitat simulation technique as a powerful tool for instream flow needs assessment and river ecosystem management. Environ Energy Econ Res 1(2):171–182

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sedighkia M, Ayyoubzadeh SA, Hajiesmaeili M (2014) Environmental challenges and uncertainties of hydrological and hydraulic approaches for environmental flow assessment in streams of Iran. In: The 4th international conference on environmental challenges and dendrochronology, Sari, Iran. A-10–408–1.

  31. Stalnaker CB (1994) The instream flow incremental methodology: a primer for IFIM, vol. 29. National Ecology Research Center, National Biological Survey.

  32. Tennant DL (1976) Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries 1(4):6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tesfaye TW, Dhanya CT, Gosain AK (2020) Modeling the impact of climate change on the environmental flow indicators over Omo-Gibe basin, Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ 6:2063–2089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19(5–6):397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Waddle T (2001) PHABSIM for Windows user's manual and exercises (No. 2001–340).

  36. Whitley D (1994) A genetic algorithm tutorial. Stat Comput 4(2):65–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

It is essential to appreciate efforts by Mr. Ahmadi to provide facilities in all of the stages of field studies.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Sedighkia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

There is no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sedighkia, M., Datta, B. & Abdoli, A. Utilizing classic evolutionary algorithms to assess the Brown trout (Salmo trutta) habitats by ANFIS-based physical habitat model. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01128-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Physical habitat simulation
  • Genetic algorithm
  • Particle swarm optimization
  • Back propagation
  • Hybrid algorithm