A numerical model of groundwater flow in Karewa-Alluvium aquifers of NW Indian Himalayan Region

Abstract

Process-based groundwater flow models are an important tool for gaining useful insights into the hydrogeological characteristics of a complex aquifer system. A conceptual model of a multilayer alluvial aquifer system at the base of Karewa mountain front is presented indicating the hydrogeological framework and the various flow processes affecting the groundwater flow system. Based on the conceptual model, a MODFLOW NWT-based numerical simulation model of groundwater flow was developed for the region. As interpreted from the hydrogeological framework, the simulation was carried out in the context of two aquifers, the top minor aquifer which is regarded as confined–unconfined and the lower major predominantly confined aquifer. Hydraulic heads measured in 104 wells during predevelopment period were used to calibrate hydraulic conductivity, natural recharge and evapotranspiration for the steady state model. For validation, observations from 38 wells corresponding to a recent steady state of aquifers were used. Performance statistic R2 = 0.83 and 0.79 for calibration and validation, respectively. Steady-state groundwater budgets including natural recharge were thus estimated. Calibrated horizontal hydraulic conductivity of aquifers is of the order of 0.0015–0.0031 m/s. Total natural recharge to the aquifers from precipitation and mountain subsurface flow corresponding to predevelopment and recent conditions was estimated as 96.39 and 64.21 Mm3/month, respectively. Steady-state simulations indicate an average decline of 2–5 m in groundwater heads over a period of about two decades, attributable to decreased recharge. Results of this model can help in sustainable development of groundwater in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Availability of data and material

The authors are responsible to provide the data pertaining to the research, on request.

Code availability

The software applications used in this study is available from Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc., Canada and Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), USA.

References

  1. Ahlfeld DP, Barlow PM, Mulligan AE (2005) GWM--A ground-water management process for the US Geological Survey modular ground-water model (MODFLOW-2000). US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey

  2. Anderson MP, Woessner WW, Hunt RJ (2015) Applied groundwater modeling: simulation of flow and advective transport. Academic press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (2000) SSG software. The Scientific Software Group, Washington. http://www.scisoftware.com

  4. Anonymous (2000) Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc., Canada. www.waterloohydrogeologic.com

  5. Azeref BG, Bushira KM (2020) Numerical groundwater flow modeling of the Kombolcha catchment northern Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(2):1233–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00753-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhatt DK (1976) On the Quaternary geology of the Kashmir Valley with special reference to stratigraphy and sedimentation. Geol Surv India Misc Publ 24:188–204

    Google Scholar 

  7. Central Groundwater Board (2013) Ground water information booklet Badgam District, Jammu & Kashmir. Jammu. http://cgwb.gov.in. Accessed Mar 2019

  8. Central Groundwater Board (2017) Report on aquifer mapping & management plan of Kashmir Valley, J&K (5200 sq.km.). http://cgwb.gov.in/AQM/NAQUIM_REPORT/JandK/Kashmir%20Valley.pdf. Accessed June 2020

  9. Chandio AS, Lee TS, Mirjat MS (2012) The extent of waterlogging in the lower Indus Basin (Pakistan)–a modeling study of groundwater levels. J. Hydrol. 426:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiang WH (2005) 3D-groundwater modeling with PMWIN: a simulation system for modeling groundwater flow and transport processes. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27592-4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coelho CD, Faria ACS, Marques EAG (2017) Comparative analysis of different boundary conditions and their influence on numerical hydrogeological modeling of Palmital watershed, southeast Brazil. J Hydrol Reg Stud 12:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dar RA, Romshoo SA, Chandra R, Ahmad I (2014) Tectono-geomorphic study of the Karewa basin of Kashmir valley. J Asian Earth Sci 92:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. deMarsily G (1986) Quantitative hydrogeology groundwater hydrology for engineers. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, p 440

    Google Scholar 

  14. Diersch HJ (2009) FEFLOW finite element subsurface flow and transport simulation system, reference manual. WASY GmbH Institute for Water Resources Planning and System Research, Berlin

  15. Domenico PA, Schwartz FW (1990) Physical and chemical hydrogeology. Wiley, New York, p 824

    Google Scholar 

  16. Flores-Márquez EL, Kohn Ledesma I, Arango-Galván C (2011) Sustainable geohydrological model of San Luis Potosí aquifer. Mexico Geofis Int 50(4):425–438

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gebere A, Kawo NS, Karuppannan S, Hordofa AT, Paron P (2020) Numerical modeling of groundwater flow system in the Modjo River catchment, Central Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ 21:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harbaugh AW (2005) MODFLOW-2005, the US Geological Survey modular ground-water model: the ground-water flow process (pp. 6-A16). Reston, VA: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A16

  19. Jazayeri A, Werner AD (2019) Boundary condition nomenclature confusion in groundwater flow modelling. Tech Comment Groundw 57(5):664–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khadri SF, Pande C (2016) Ground water flow modeling for calibrating steady state using MODFLOW software: a case study of Mahesh River basin, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(1):39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lydekker R (1878) Notes on the geology of Kashmir, Kishtwar and Pangi. Rec Geol Surv India 11(1):30–64

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maheswaran R, Khosa R, Gosain AK, Lahari S, Sinha SK, Chahar BR, Dhanya CT (2016) Regional scale groundwater modelling study for Ganga River basin. J Hydrol 541:727–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Markstrom SL, Niswonger RG, Regan RS, Prudic DE, Barlow PM (2008) GSFLOW-Coupled Ground-water and Surface-water FLOW model based on the integration of the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) and the Modular Ground-Water Flow Model (MODFLOW-2005). US Geol Surv Tech Methods 6:240

    Google Scholar 

  24. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite difference groundwater flow model. US Geol Surv Open File Rep 83–875:528

    Google Scholar 

  25. Niswonger RG, Panday S, Ibaraki M (2011) MODFLOW-NWT, a Newton formulation for MODFLOW-2005. US Geol Surv Tech Methods 6(A37):44

    Google Scholar 

  26. Palma HC, Bentley LR (2007) A regional-scale groundwater flow model for the Leon-Chinandega aquifer. Nicaragua Hydrogeol J 15(8):1457–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Panday, Sorab, Langevin CD, Niswonger RG, Ibaraki, Motomu, Hughes JD (2017) MODFLOW-USG version 1.4.00: An unstructured grid version of MODFLOW for simulating groundwater flow and tightly coupled processes using a control volume finite-difference formulation: U.S. Geological Survey Software Release 6(A45):66. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5066/F7R20ZFJ

  28. Prasad YS, Rao YR (2018) Groundwater flow modelling of a micro-watershed in the upland area of East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 4(3):1007–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shafiq MU, Islam ZU, Abida AW, Bhat MS, Ahmed P (2019) Recent trends in precipitation regime of Kashmir valley, India. Disaster Adv 12(4):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shafiq MU, Rasool R, Ahmed P, Dimri AP (2019) Temperature and precipitation trends in Kashmir Valley, north western Himalayas. Theor Appl Climatol 135(1–2):293–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2377-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh A (2014) Groundwater resources management through the applications of simulation modeling: a review. Sci Total Environ 499:414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zume T, J, Tarhule AA, (2011) Modelling the response of an alluvial aquifer to anthropogenic and recharge stresses in the United States Southern Great Plains. J Earth Syst Sci 120(4):557–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. World Bank (2010) Deep wells and prudence: towards pragmatic action for addressing groundwater overexploitation in India. Report, World Bank, Washington, DC

  34. Zhou Y, Li W (2011) A review of regional groundwater flow modeling. Geosci Front 2(2):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Central Groundwater Board, India; Directorate of Geology and Mining, Government of Jammu and Kashmir (erstwhile) and Irrigation and Flood Control Department, Government of Jammu and Kashmir (erstwhile) for providing the necessary data for the present study. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers whose reviews helped a great deal in improving the manuscript.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syeedah Raazia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raazia, S., Dar, A.Q. A numerical model of groundwater flow in Karewa-Alluvium aquifers of NW Indian Himalayan Region. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01126-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Jhelum basin
  • Groundwater model
  • Numerical model
  • Karewa–alluvium aquifer
  • Hydrogeological conceptual model