Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated water resources management under climate change scenarios in the sub-basin of Abaya-Chamo, Ethiopia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the impact of climate change on surface water availability and its allocation system was carried out within Bilate watershed in the Abaya-Chamo sub-basin of Rift Valley Lakes Basin in Ethiopia. Predicted rainfall and temperature time series data were obtained from regional climate outputs of Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX)-Africa for the three representative concentration pathways (RCP) scenarios (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5) for the four time periods (2015–2020, 2021–2025, 2026–2030 and 2031–2035). The result revealed that the future maximum and minimum temperature can be increased during all three scenarios. However, precipitation showed an increase or decreasing trend in future scenarios at different time scales. Further, SWAT model was calibrated and validated to simulate the future streamflow under RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 scenarios. WEAP model was employed for integrated water resources allocations under selected climate change scenarios. The SWAT model performance was found satisfactory during calibration [correlation coefficient (R2) = 0.77, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) = 0.755, percent deviation (D) = 2.558] and validation period (R2 = 0.798, NSE = 0.778, D= − 3.93). The model output shows that there may be an annual decrease in flow upto − 12.1 and − 16.21% for RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 scenarios. The annual surface water availability was found to be 570 million cubic meter (MCM) in the Bilate watershed for the current accounted year 2015. However, the current utilization of these resources is very limited about 51.49 MCM (9.03%) in the basin including domestic, livestock and minor agricultural activities. Furthermore, four scenarios were developed based on different set of assumptions in the basin up to 2035. It was estimated that total annual consumption will be around 14.53, 20.43, 37.47 and 44.46% for the reference, scenario one, two and three, respectively. This study also determines the environmental flow requirements (25% of the mean annual flow volume) to maintain the basic ecological functioning in the basin and regulate flow for downstream uses. This study was found that integrated water resources management strategy in the basin could utilize water resources potential effectively in the future. Therefore, this study is useful for the different stakeholders in the study region for the optimal allocation of water resources under climate change scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment Part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awulachew SB, Smakhtin V, Molden D (2012) The Nile river basin: water, agriculture, governance and livelihoods. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaemiso SE, Abebe A, Pingale SM (2016) Assessment of the impact of climate change on surface hydrological processes using SWAT: a case study of Omo-Gibe river basin, Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0257-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke L, Edmonds J, Jacoby H, Pitcher H, Reilly J, Richels R (2007) Scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations. Department of Energy, Office of Biological & Environmental Research. The U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, Washington, 7 DC USA

  • Daniel EB, Camp JV, Leboeuf EJ et al (2011) Watershed modeling and its applications: a state-of-the-art review. Open Hydrol J 5:26–50. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874378101105010026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilnesaw A (2006) Modelling of hydrology and soil erosion of Upper Awash River Basin. PhD Thesis. University of Bonn

  • Etchells T, Malano H (2005) Identifying uncertainty in water allocation modelling. In: MODSIM05-international congress on modelling and simulation: advances and applications for management and decision making, proceedings. pp 2484–2490

  • Flint LE, Flint AL, Stolp BJ, Danskin WR (2012) A basin-scale approach for assessing water resources in a semiarid environment: San Diego region, California and Mexico. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:3817–3833. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3817-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebere SB, Alamirew T, Merkel BJ, Melesse AM (2015) Performance of high-resolution satellite rainfall products over data scarce parts of eastern Ethiopia. Remote Sens 7:11639–11663. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70911639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Githui F, Gitau W, Mutua F, Bauwens W (2009) Climate change impact on SWAT simulated streamflow in western Kenya. Int J Climatol 29:1823–1834. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GWP (2009) A handbook for integrated water resources management in basins

  • IPCC (2007) IPCC fourth assessment report (AR4). Ipcc 1:976. p 02767783

  • Lenhart T, Eckhardt K, Fohrer N, Frede H-G (2002) Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 27:645–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00049-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP (1997) Quantifying trends in system sustainability. Hydrol Sci J 42:513–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669709492051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayol MD (2015) Assessment of surface water resources and its allocation: case study of Bahr el-Jebel river sub-basin south Sudan. Unpublished MSc thesis, Mekelle University, Ethiopia

  • McCartney MP (2007) Decision support systems for large dam planning and operation in Africa. International Water Management Institute, IWMI Working Paper 119, Sri Lanka, Colombo, pp. 47

  • Mccartney MP, Arranz R (2007) Evaluation of historic, current and future water demand in the Olifants River Catchment, South Africa

  • Morris MD (1991) Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33:161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2005) Soil and water assessment tool technical documentation. Version 2005. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas. TWRI report TR-191, p 506

  • Riahi K, Grübler A, Nakicenovic N (2007) Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74:887–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roa-García MC (2014) Equity, efficiency and sustainability in water allocation in the Andes: Trade-offs in a full world. Water Altern 7:298–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang J (2005) Modelling the impact of changes in land use, climate and reservoir storage on flooding in the Nyando basin. M.Sc. Thesis. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya

  • Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Srinivasan R, Hauck LM (2001) Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(5):1169–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEI (2008) WEAP: water evaluation and planning system, tutorial. Stockholm environment. Stockholm Environment Institute, Boston Center

  • Sethi R, Pandey BK, Krishan R, Khare D, Nayak PC (2015) Performance evaluation and hydrological trend detection of a reservoir under climate change condition. Model Earth Syst Environ 1:33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0035-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setyorini A, Khare D, Pingale SM (2017) Simulating the impact of land use/land cover change and climate variability on watershed hydrology in the Upper Brantas basin, Indonesia. Appl Geomatics https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-017-0193-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiferraw A, McCartney M (2008) Investigating environmental flow requirements at the source of the Blue Nile River. In: Paper presented at the International Nile Basin Development Forum, Khartoum, Sudan, 3–5 November 2008. 14p

  • Smakhtin V, Anputhas M (2006) An assessment of environmental flow requirements of Indian river basins. International Water Management Institute, Colombo. (IWMI research report 107)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadesse N (2006) Surface waters potential of the Hantebet basin, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Agri Eng Int CIGR EJ VIII: 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2009) Water security and ecosystem services, the critical connection, a contribution to the United Nations World Water Assessment Program (WWAP). (Unit Nation Environmental Program (UNEP))

  • UNESCAP (2000) Principles and practices of water allocation among water-use sectors. ESCAP water resources series no 80, Bangkok

  • van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change 109:5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L (2005) Cooperative water resources allocation among competing users, PhD thesis, Department of Systems Design Engineering. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

  • WMO (2012) Technical material for water resources assessment (WMO-No.1095). Geneva

  • Yang H, Zehnder A (2007) “Virtual water”: an unfolding concept in integrated water resources management. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006048

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates D, Sieber J, Purkey D, Huber-Lee A, Galbraith H (2005a) WEAP21: a demand, priority and preference driven water planning model: part 2, aiding freshwater ecosystem service evaluation. Water Int 30(4):501–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates D, Sieber J, Purkey D, Huber-Lee A (2005b) WEAP21: a demand, priority, and preference driven water planning model: part 1, model characteristics. Water Int 30(4):487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial assistance provided by the Water Resources Centre, Arba Minch University is duly acknowledged. Dr. Abdella Kemal, Scientific Director and Dr. Samuel Dagalo, Director, Water Resources Centre, Arba Minch Water Technology Institute are also acknowledged for his support. We would like to acknowledge the Ethiopian Ministry of Water, Irrigation and Energy, National Meteorological Agency and International Water Management Institute for providing the necessary data. We also gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behailu Hussen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussen, B., Mekonnen, A. & Pingale, S.M. Integrated water resources management under climate change scenarios in the sub-basin of Abaya-Chamo, Ethiopia. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 4, 221–240 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0438-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0438-9

Keywords

Navigation