Advertisement

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 89–96 | Cite as

Experimental modeling for upgrading of brown barite ore by different processing methods

  • N. Molaei
  • H. Razavi
  • S. Chehreh Chelgani
Original Article

Abstract

Barite powder as a weighting agent is the most important additive into drilling mud for the oil and gas extraction. In this study, production of brown barite powder (SG 4.065 g/cm3) was examined by flotation (direct and reverse) and magnetic separation for upgrading the quality of fine barite particles and receive it to the standard point for drilling applications (SG higher than 4.2 g/cm3). Mineralogy analysis showed that hematite was the main associated mineral, and particles were liberated below 200 µm. Thus wet high intensity magnetic separator (WHIMS) was used and results indicated that WHIMS could increase the quality of product to SG ~ 4.2 g/cm3. However, flotation separation was examined for the possible improvement in quality of the product. The Taguchi experimental modeling method was applied to scheme flotation tests, compute the various values of flotation parameters for upgrading the SG of products and determine their optimal values. Outcomes demonstrated that flotation can provide higher quality for products than WHIMS, S.G: 4.44 and 4.35 g/cm3 in direct and reverse flotation, respectively. Results indicated that Taguchi method can successfully be used for design of experiments in the manufacturing process; reduce risks and costs of industrial development. These outcomes illustrated that the Mehdiabad brown barite ore can be upgraded by direct flotation and meet the required quality for drilling.

Keywords

Barite Magnetic separation Direct flotation Reverse flotation Taguchi Specific gravity 

References

  1. Al-Hitti AH, Al-Assaf SA, Ibrahim DS (2005) Reduction of formation damage due to drilling muds. J Eng 11:21–32Google Scholar
  2. American Petroleum Institute (2010) Purchasing Guidelines handbook: specification for drilling fluids—specifications and testing. API Specification 13A 18th edn pp 1–22Google Scholar
  3. Antony J, Antony FJ (2001) Teaching the Taguchi method to industrial engineers. Work Study 50(4):141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciccu R, Curreli L, Giuliani S, Manca PP, Massacci G (1987) Optimization of an integrated flowsheet for barite processing. APCOM 87. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Symposium on the Application of Computers and Mathematics in the Mineral Industries. Volume 2: Metallurgy. Johannesburg, SAIMM pp 281–293Google Scholar
  5. Dhorgham SI, Nagham AS, Balasubramanian N (2017) Effect of barite and gas oil drilling fluid additives on the reservoir rock characteristics. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol 7(1):281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghalib HB, Almallah IAR (2017) Scaling simulation resulting from mixing predicted model between Mishrif formation water and different waters injection in Basrah oil field, southern Iraq. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(46):1–14Google Scholar
  7. Golshani T, Jorjani E, Chehreh Chelgani S, Shafaei SZ, Heidari Nafechi Y (2013) Modeling and process optimization for microbial desulphurization of coal by using a two-level full factorial design. Int J Min Sci Technol 23(2):261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hadavandi E, Hower JC, Chehreh Chelgani S (2017) Modeling of gross calorific value based on coal properties by support vector regression method. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris MJ (1988) New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources. Open File Report #336, Barite Flotation, El Cuervo Butte, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  10. Hodge RM, Augustine BG, Burton RC, Sanders WW (1997) Evaluation and selection of drill-in-fluid candidates to minimize formation damage. SPE 31082:174–179Google Scholar
  11. Kecir M, Kecir A (2015) Selective flotation of barite and associated minerals: a comparative study. J Polish Miner Eng Soc 16:117–124Google Scholar
  12. Molaei N, Razavi H, Chehreh Chelgani S (2018) Designing different beneficiation techniques by Taguchi method for upgrading Mehdi-Abad white barite ore. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2017.1399889
  13. Omorogie MO, Naidoo EB, Ofomaja AE (2017) Response surface methodology, central composite design, process methodology and characterization of pyrolyzed KOH pretreated environmental biomass: mathematical modelling and optimization approach. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raju GB, Prabhakar S, Rao SS (2005) Studies on the Beneficiation of Barite. National Metallurgical Laboratory (Madras Centre), C.S.I.R. Madras Complex. Taramani Chennai 600(113):322–330Google Scholar
  15. Raju GB, Ratchambigai S, Rao MA, Vasumathi N, Vijaya Kumar TV, Prabhakar S, Rao SS (2016) Beneficiation of Barite dumps by flotation column; lab-scale studies to commercial production. Trans Indian Inst Met 69(1):75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roy R (1990) A primer on the Taguchi method. Van Nosteand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Seyedmohammadi J (2017) The effects of drilling fluids and environment protection from pollutants using some models. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shahbazi B, Chehreh Chelgani S, Matin SS (2017) Prediction of froth flotation responses based on various conditioning parameters by Random Forest method. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspect 529:936–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sharip Z, Saman JM, Noordin N, Majizat A, Suratman S, Shaaban AJ (2016) Assessing the spatial water quality dynamics in Putrajaya Lake: a modelling approach. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Slaczka ASt (1987) Effects of an ultrasonic field on the flotation selectivity of barite from a barite-fluorite-quartz ore. Int J Miner Process 20:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith K, Westwood D (2016) Iranian oil and gas production shows significant upside potential, but limitations remain. Oil Gas Forecast 5(1):1–10Google Scholar
  22. Sonmez A, Versan KM, Ozel R (2013) Performance analysis of drilling fluid liquid lubricants. J Petrol Sci Eng 108:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Udenko A, Onyedika Gerald AC, Martins O, Ausaji A (2011) Flotation recovery of barite from ore using palm bunch based collector. Int J Chem Sci 9(3):1518–1524Google Scholar
  24. Wang H, Dai H, Yang W, Li T (2014) Research on the flotation experiment of a low-grade barite ore in Myanmar. Appl Mech Mater 644–650:5277–5280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhao Y, Liu S, Li X, Li T, Hou K (2014) Recovery of low grade barite ore by flotation in the Southwest Area of China. Appl Mech Mater 543–547:3865–3868CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied ChemistryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of mineral processing engineering, Faculty of mining engineeringUniversity of AmirkabirTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations