Advertisement

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 825–839 | Cite as

Multi-GCMs approach for assessing climate change impact on water resources in Thailand

  • Proloy Deb
  • Mukand S. Babel
  • Anjelo Francis Denis
Original Article

Abstract

Climate-driven floods have severely affected Thailand’s economy in the recent past, indicating the necessity of better water management plans at both watershed and national scale. Corresponding to this, the present paper attempts to address the potential implications of future climate on hydrology at seasonal scale in Thailand. Nine Hydrological Response Units (HRUs) were identified from the whole country based on the similarity in land use and soil properties which were further modelled by HEC-HMS for water resources estimation under climate change. The future precipitation data for SRES A2 and B2 scenarios were derived from five commonly used Global Climate Models (GCMs). Simulation for the dry season implies that the water resources are expected to change from − 17.43 to 54.74%, whereas for the wet season, the projection is expected to vary from − 7.47 to 48.29% relative to the baseline period (1991–2000) irrespective of the scenarios and time windows considered. The uncertainty in water availability projection ranges from 0.78 to 15.78% and 1.87 to 22.35% for the corresponding seasons. At national scale, the decadal water availability ranges from − 5.38 to 13.96% and 0.71 to 30.27% for dry and wet seasons respectively when compared to the baseline period. Similarly, the uncertainty associated ranges from 1.03 to 7.78% and 2.89 to 13.47% for the corresponding seasons. The outcomes of the study emphasize on increased flow both in the HRUs and at the national level and will be helpful in formulating better water management plans to counteract the possible floods in the future.

Keywords

Climate change Uncertainty SRES HEC-HMS Water resources Thailand 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Thai Meteorological Department (TMD) and Royal Irrigation Department (RID) for providing all the necessary meteorological and discharge data respectively, which were required to conduct this research work. The authors also would like to thank the anonymous reviewer(s) for their constructive criticism on the manuscript to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abbott MB, Refsgaard JC (1996) Distributed hydrological modelling. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson L, Samuelsson P, Kjellström E (2011) Assessment of climate change impact on water resources in the Pungwe river basin. Tellus 63:138–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnell NW, Lloyd-Hughes B (2014) The global-scale impacts of climate change on water resources and flooding under new climate and socio-economic scenarios. Clim Change 122:127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaulieu E, Lucas Y, Viville D et al (2016) Hydrological and vegetation response to climate change in a forested mountainous catchment. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0244-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beven K (2001) How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 5:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biftu GF, Gan TY (2001) Semi-distributed, physically based, hydrologic modeling of the Paddle River Basin, Alberta, using remotely sensed data. J Hydrol 244:137–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JN, Gupta AS, Brown JR et al (2013) Implications of CMIP3 model biases and uncertainties for climate projections in the western tropical Pacific. Clim Change 119:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brutsaert W, Parlange MB (1998) Hydrologic cycle explains the evaporation paradox. Nature  https://doi.org/10.1038/23845 Google Scholar
  9. Chadli K, Kirat M, Laadoua A, Harchaoui NE (2017) Runoff modeling of Sebou watershed (Morocco) using SCS curve number method and geographic information system. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0215-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaemiso SE, Abebe A, Pingale SM (2016) Assessment of the impact of climate change on surface hydrological processes using SWAT: a case study of Omo-Gibe river basin, Ethiopia. Mod Earth Syst Environ 2:205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0257-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen H, Xu C, Shenglian G (2012) Comparison and evaluation of multiple GCMs, statistical downscaling and hydrological models in the study of climate change impacts on runoff. J Hydrol 434–435:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chien H, Yeh P, Knouft JH (2013) Modelling the potential impacts of climate change on streamflow in agricultural watersheds of the Midwestern United States. J Hydrol 491:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choudhari K, Panigrahi B, Paul JC (2014) Simulation of rainfall-runoff process using HEC-HMS model for Balijore. Int J Geomat Geosci 5:253–265Google Scholar
  14. Davis EGR, Simonovic SP (2011) Global water resources modelling with an integrated model of the social—economic—environmental system. Adv Water Resour 34:684–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deb P, Babel MS (2013) Assessment of impacts of climate change and adaptation measures for maize production in East Sikkim, India. International Conference on Climate Change, Water and Disaster in Mountainous Areas, 27–29 November 2013, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  16. Deb P, Shrestha S, Babel MS (2014) Forecasting climate change impacts and evaluation of adaptation options for maize cropping in the hilly terrain of Himalayas: Sikkim, India. Theor Appl Climatol 121:649–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deb P, Kiem AS, Babel MS, Chu ST, Chakma B (2015) Evaluation of climate change impacts and adaptation strategies for maize cultivation in the Himalayan foothills of India. J Water Clim Change 6:596–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delworth TL, Stouffer RJ, Dixon KW et al (2002) Review of simulations of climate variability and change with the GFDL R30 coupled climate model. Clim Dynam 19:555–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deser C, Phillips A, Bourdette V, Teng H (2012) Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability. Clim Dynam 38:527–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dobler C, Hagemann S, Wilby RL, Stötter J (2012) Quantifying different sources of uncertainty in hydrological projections in an Alpine watershed. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:4343–4360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ebi KL, Bowen K (2016) Extreme events as sources of health vulnerability: drought as an example. Weather Clim Extremes 11:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flato GM, Boer GJ, Lee WG, McFarlane NA, Ramsden D, Reader MC, Weaver AJ (2000) The Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis global coupled model and its climate. Clim Dynam 16:451–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gale EL, Saunders MA (2013) The 2011 Thailand flood: climate causes and return periods. Weather 68:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gordon C, O’Farrel SP (1997) Transient climate change in the CSIRO coupled model with dynamic sea ice. Mon Weather Rev 125:875–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gordon C, Cooper C, Senior CA et al (2000) The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Clim Dynam 16:147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halwatura D, Najim MMM (2013) Application of the HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation in a tropical catchment. Environ Modell Softw 46:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Homdee T, Pongput K, Kanae S (2016) A comparative performance analysis of three standardized climatic drought indices in the Chi River basin, Thailand. Agric Nat Res 50:211–219Google Scholar
  28. IPCC (2007) IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. In: Parry ML, Canzaini OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Naules J.Boschung, A., Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds.) Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Khoi DN, Suetsugi T (2012) Hydrologic response to climate change: a case study for the Be River catchment, Vietnam. J Water Clim Change 3:207–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knutti R, Sedláček J (2013) Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nat Clim Change  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1716 Google Scholar
  32. Leander R, Buishand T (2007) Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows. J Hydrol 332:487–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li F, Zhang G, Xu YJ (2016) Assessing climate change impacts on water resources in the Songhua river basin. Water 8:420.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w8100420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loo YY, Billa L, Singh A (2015) Effect of climate change on seasonal monsoon in Asia and its impact on the variability of monsoon rainfall in Southeast Asia. Geosci Front 6:817–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyne V, Hollick M (1979) Stochastic time variable rainfall-runoff modelling. Proceedings of the Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Perth, 10–12 September, Institution of Engineers National Conference Publication, No. 79/10, pp 89–92Google Scholar
  36. Mahmood R, Jia S, Babel MS (2016) Potential impacts of climate change on water resources in the Kunhar river basin, Pakistan. Water 8:23–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mandal SP, Chakrabarty A (2016) Flash flood risk assessment for upper Teesta river basin: using the hydrological modeling system (HEC-HMS) software. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:59. https://doi10.1007/s40808-016-0110-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maraun D (2016) Bias correcting climate change simulations—a critical review. Curr Clim Chang Rep 2:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maurer E (2007) Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in Sierra Nevada, California, under two emission scenarios. Clim Change 82:309–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Minville M, Brissette F, Leconte R (2008) Uncertainty of the impacts of climate change on the hydrology of a Nordic watershed. J Hydrol 358:70–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Numaguti A, Takahashi M, Nakajima T, Sumi A (1997) Description of CCSR/NIES/ atmospheric General Circulation Model. CGER’s Supercomputer Monograph Report, 3, National Institute of Environmental Sciences, TsukubaGoogle Scholar
  42. Paudel M, Nelson EJ, Scharffenberg W (2009) Comparison of lumped and quasi-distributed clark runoff models using SCS curve number equation. J Hydrol Engg 14:1098–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ponpang-Nga P, Techamahasaranont J (2016) Effects of climate and land use changes on water balance in upstream in the Chao Phraya River basin, Thailand. Agric Nat Res 50:310–320Google Scholar
  44. Rahman KU, Balkhair KS, Almazroui M, Masood A (2017) Sub-catchments flow losses computation using Muskingum-Cunge routing method and HEC-HMS GIS based techniques, case study of Wadi Al-Lith, Saudi Arabia. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sa’adi Z, Shahid S, Chung E-S, Ismail T (2017) Projection of spatial and temporal changes of rainfall in Sarawak of Borneo Island using statistical downscaling of CMIP5 models. Atmos Res 197:446–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sangmanee C, Wattayakorn G, Pramot S (2013) Simulating changes in discharge and suspended sediment loads of the Bangpakong River, Thailand driven by future climate change. Maejo Int J Sci TechTech 7:72–84Google Scholar
  47. Scanlon TS, Caylor KK, Levin SA, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2007) Positive feedbacks promote power-law clustering of Kalahari vegetation. Nat 449:209–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharma D, Babel MS (2013) Application of downscaled precipitation for hydrological climate-change impact assessment in the upper Ping River Basin of Thailand. Clim Dynam 41:2589–2602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sharma D, Babel MS (2017) Assessing hydrological impacts of climate change using bias-corrected downscaled precipitation in Mae Klong basin of Thailand. Meteorol Appl  https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1706 Google Scholar
  50. Shrestha (2014a) Assessment of water availability under climate change scenarios in Thailand. J Earth Sci Clim Change. 5:184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shrestha (2014b) Assessment of water availability under climate change scenarios in Thailand. In: Shrestha S (ed) Climate change impacts and adaptation in water resources and water use sectors, Springer, Switzerland, pp 9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shrestha S, Lohpaisankrit W (2016) Flood hazard assessment under climate change scenarios in the Yang River Basin, Thailand. Int J Sustain Built Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.09.006 Google Scholar
  53. Shrestha S, Thin NMM, Deb P (2014) Assessment of climate change impacts on irrigation water requirement and rice yield for Ngamoeyeik Irrigation Project in Myanmar. J Water Clim Change 5:427–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shrestha S, Deb P, Bui TTT (2016) Adaptation strategies for rice cultivation under climate change in Central Vietnam. Mitig Adapt Strateg Global Chang 21:15–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Singh VP (2012) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resource Publications, COGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith JB, Hulme M (1998) Climate Change Scenarios, Chap. 3. In: Feenstra J, Burton I, Smith JB, Tol RSJ (eds) Handbook on Methods of Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Strategies, UNEP/IES, Version 2.0, Amsterdam, pp 3.1–3.40Google Scholar
  57. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor MMB, Miller HL Jr, Chen Z (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Soraisam B, Karumuri A, Pai DS (2018) Uncertainties in observations and climate projections for the North East India. Global Planet Change 160:96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tan ML, Ficklin DL, Ibrahim AL, Yusop Z (2014) Impacts and uncertainties of climate change on streamflow of the Johor River Basin, Malaysia using CMIP5 General Circulation Model ensemble. J Water Clim Change 5:676–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thilakarathne M, Sridhar V (2017) Characterization of future drought conditions in the Lower Mekong River Basin Weather Clim Extremes.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2017.07.004 Google Scholar
  61. US Army Corps of Engineers (2008) Hydrologic Modelling System (HEC-HMS) Application Guide: Version 3.1.0. Institute of Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center, DavisGoogle Scholar
  62. Wichitarapongsakun P, Sarin C, Klomjek P, Chuenchooklin S (2016) Rainfall prediction and meteorological drought analysis in the Sakae Krang River basin of Thailand. Agric Nat Res 50:490–498Google Scholar
  63. Yadav S, Deb P, Kumar S, Pandey V, Pandey PK (2016) Trends in major and minor meteorological variables and their influence on reference evapotranspiration for mid Himalayan region at East Sikkim, India. J Mt Sci 13:3021–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yao H, Hashino M, Terakawa A, Suzuki T (1998) Comparison of distributed and lumped hydrological models. Ann J Hydraul Eng 42:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang J, Ross MA, Geurink J (2012) Discretization approach in integrated hydrologic model for surface and groundwater interaction. Chin Geogr Sci 22:659–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Water Engineering and Management, School of Engineering and TechnologyAsian Institute of TechnologyPathumthaniThailand
  2. 2.Department of AgricultureSuresh Gyan Vihar UniversityJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations