Advertisement

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 111–126 | Cite as

Modelling saltwater intrusion processes and development of a multi-objective strategy for management of coastal aquifers utilizing planned artificial freshwater recharge

  • Alvin Lal
  • Bithin Datta
Original Article
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

The need for freshwater is emerging as the utmost critical resource issue facing humanity. In several arid and semi-arid parts of the world, groundwater resources are being used as an alternative source of freshwater. Excessive and/or unplanned groundwater withdrawals have a negative impact on the aquifer. Groundwater withdrawn from coastal aquifers are susceptible to contamination by saltwater intrusion. This study investigates the efficiency and viability of using artificial freshwater recharge (AFR) to increase fresh groundwater pumping from production wells for beneficial use. A three dimensional (3D), transient, density dependent, finite element based flow and transport model of an illustrative coastal aquifer is implemented using FEMWATER code. First, the effect of AFR on inland encroachment of saline water is quantified for existing scenarios. Specifically, groundwater head and salinity concentration differences at monitoring locations before and after artificial recharge is presented. Second, a multi-objective management model incorporating groundwater pumping and AFR is implemented to control groundwater salinization in an illustrative coastal aquifer system. To avoid computational burden and ensure computational feasibility, the numerical flow and transport simulation model is substituted by the new support vector regression (SVR) predictive models as approximate simulators in the simulation–optimization framework for developing optimal management strategies. The performance evaluation results indicated that the SVR models were adequately trained and were capable of approximating saltwater intrusion processes in the aquifer. Multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) is used to solve the multi-objective optimization problem. The Pareto-optimal front obtained as solution from the SVR–MOGA optimization model presented a set of optimal solutions needed for the sustainable management of the coastal aquifer. The pumping strategies obtained as Pareto optimal solutions with and without freshwater recharge wells showed that saltwater intrusion is sensitive to the AFR. Also, the hydraulic head lenses created by AFR can be used as one practical option to control saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers. The developed 3D saltwater intrusion model, predictive capability of the developed SVR models and the feasibility of using the proposed linked multi-objective SVR–MOGA optimization model makes the proposed methodology potentially attractive in solving large scale regional saltwater intrusion management problems.

Keywords

Saltwater intrusion Artificial freshwater recharge Simulation–optimization Support vector regression Surrogate model Multi-objective management model 

References

  1. Abd-Elhamid HF, Javadi AA (2011) A cost-effective method to control seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Water Res Manag 25:2755–2780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed AT (2017) Experimental and numerical study for seawater intrusion remediation in heterogeneous coastal aquifer. J Environ Manag 198:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashrafzadeh A, Roshandel F, Khaledian M, Vazifedoust M, Rezaei M (2016) Assessment of groundwater salinity risk using kriging methods: a case study in northern Iran. Agric Water Manag 178:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Ketabchi H (2011) Elitist continuous ant colony optimization algorithm for optimal management of coastal aquifers. Water Res Manag 25:165–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Ketabchi H, Rajabi MM (2013) Optimal management of a freshwater lens in a small island using surrogate models and evolutionary algorithms. J Hydrol Eng 19:339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badiuzzaman P, McLaughlin E, McCauley D (2017) Substituting freshwater: can ocean desalination and water recycling capacities substitute for groundwater depletion in California? J Environ Manag 203:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bajer L, Holena M (2012) RBF-based surrogate model for evolutionary optimization. In: ITAT. Citeseer, pp 3–8Google Scholar
  8. Basak D, Pal S, Patranabis DC (2007) Support vector regression. Neural Inf Process 11:203–224Google Scholar
  9. Bechikh S, Said LB, Ghédira K (2011) Searching for knee regions of the Pareto front using mobile reference points. Soft Comput 15:1807–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benseddik B, El Mrabet E, El Mansouri B, Chao J, Kili M (2017) Delineation of artificial recharge zones in Mnasra Aquifer (NW, Morocco). Model Earth Syst Environ 3:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhattacharjya RK, Datta B (2009) ANN-GA-based model for multiple objective management of coastal aquifers. J Water Res Plan Manag 135:314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chevalier RF, Hoogenboom G, McClendon RW, Paz JA (2011) Support vector regression with reduced training sets for air temperature prediction: a comparison with artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 20:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chitralekha SB, Shah SL (2010) Application of support vector regression for developing soft sensors for nonlinear processes. Can J Chem Eng 88:696–709Google Scholar
  14. Clark R, Gonzalez D, Dillon P, Charles S, Cresswell D, Naumann B (2015) Reliability of water supply from stormwater harvesting and managed aquifer recharge with a brackish aquifer in an urbanising catchment and changing climate. Environ Model Softw 72:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Das A, Datta B (1999) Development of multiobjective management models for coastal aquifers. J Water Res Plan Manag 125:76–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Datta B, Peralta RC (1986) Interactive computer graphics-based multiobjective decision-making for regional groundwater management. Agric Water Manag 11:91–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dey NC, Saha R, Parvez M, Bala SK, Islam AS, Paul JK, Hossain M (2017) Sustainability of groundwater use for irrigation of dry-season crops in northwest Bangladesh. Groundw Sustain Dev 4:66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dhar A, Datta B (2009) Saltwater intrusion management of coastal aquifers. I: linked simulation-optimization. J Hydrol Eng 14:1263–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dokou Z, Dettoraki M, Karatzas GP, Varouchakis EA, Pappa A (2017) Utilizing successive linearization optimization to control the saltwater intrusion phenomenon in unconfined coastal aquifers in Crete, Greece. Environ Model Assess 22:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Don NC, Hang NTM, Araki H, Yamanishi H, Koga K (2006) Groundwater resources and management for paddy field irrigation and associated environmental problems in an alluvial coastal lowland plain. Agric Water Manag 84:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Essink GHO (2001) Improving fresh groundwater supply—problems and solutions. Ocean Coast Manag 44:429–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gano S, Kim H, Brown D (2006) Comparison of three surrogate modeling techniques: datascape, kriging, and second order regression. In: 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, p 7048Google Scholar
  23. Gong M, Li H, Jiang X (2016) A multi-objective optimization framework for ill-posed inverse problems. CAAI Trans Intell Technol 1:225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gretton A, Doucet A, Herbrich R, Rayner PJ, Scholkopf B (2001) Support vector regression for black-box system identification. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing. IEEE, pp 341–344Google Scholar
  25. Guttman J, Negev I, Rubin G (2017) Design and testing of recharge wells in a coastal aquifer: summary of field scale pilot tests. Water 9:53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hashemi H, Berndtsson R, Kompani-Zare M, Persson M (2013) Natural vs. artificial groundwater recharge, quantification through inverse modeling. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:637–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. He Z, Wen X, Liu H, Du J (2014) A comparative study of artificial neural network, adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and support vector machine for forecasting river flow in the semiarid mountain region. J Hydrol 509:379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hussain MS, Javadi AA, Ahangar-Asr A, Farmani R (2015) A surrogate model for simulation–optimization of aquifer systems subjected to seawater intrusion. J Hydrol 523:542–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hussain M, Javadi A, Sherif M (2016) Artificial recharge of coastal aquifers using treated wastewater to control saltwater intrusion. In: 24th UK Conference of the Association for Computational Mechanics in Engineering, Cardiff 2016. p 4.  https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2285.9920
  30. Islam M, Hoque MM (2016) Multiwell technique of saline and nonsaline groundwater pumping from coastal aquifers. Environ Qual Manag 25:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Javadi A, Hussain M, Sherif M, Farmani R (2015) Multi-objective optimization of different management scenarios to control seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Manag 29:1843–1857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Juang CH, Wang L, Hsieh H-S, Atamturktur S (2014) Robust geotechnical design of braced excavations in clays. Struct Saf 49:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kourakos G, Mantoglou A (2009) Pumping optimization of coastal aquifers based on evolutionary algorithms and surrogate modular neural network models. Adv Water Res 32:507–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kourakos G, Mantoglou A (2013) Development of a multi-objective optimization algorithm using surrogate models for coastal aquifer management. J Hydrol 479:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koussis A et al (2010) Cost-efficient management of coastal aquifers via recharge with treated wastewater and desalination of brackish groundwater: general framework. Hydrol Sci J 55:1217–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin H-CJ, Richards DR, Yeh G-T, Cheng J-R, Cheng H-P (1997) FEMWATER: a three-dimensional finite element computer model for simulating density-dependent flow and transport in variably saturated media. DTIC Document, VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin RS, Horn SD, Hurdle JF, Goldfarb-Rumyantzev AS (2008) Single and multiple time-point prediction models in kidney transplant outcomes. J Biomed Inform 41:944–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loh W-L (1996) On Latin hypercube sampling. Ann Stat 24:2058–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luyun R, Momii K, Nakagawa K (2011) Effects of recharge wells and flow barriers on seawater intrusion. Groundwater 49:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mahlknecht J, Merchán D, Rosner M, Meixner A, Ledesma-Ruiz R (2017) Assessing seawater intrusion in an arid coastal aquifer under high anthropogenic influence using major constituents, Sr and B isotopes in groundwater. Sci Total Environ 587:282–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mantoglou A (2003) Pumping management of coastal aquifers using analytical models of saltwater intrusion. Water Resour Res 39:1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Owusu S, Mul ML, Ghansah B, Osei-Owusu PK, Awotwe-Pratt V, Kadyampakeni D (2017) Assessing land suitability for aquifer storage and recharge in northern Ghana using remote sensing and GIS multi-criteria decision analysis technique. Model Earth Syst Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0360-6 Google Scholar
  43. Papadopoulou MP, Nikolos IK, Karatzas GP (2010) Computational benefits using artificial intelligent methodologies for the solution of an environmental design problem: saltwater intrusion. Water Sci Technol 62:1479–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Park C-H, Aral MM (2004) Multi-objective optimization of pumping rates and well placement in coastal aquifers. J Hydrol 290:80–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Park CH, Joo JG, Kim JH (2012) Integrated washland optimization model for flood mitigation using multi-objective genetic algorithm. J Hydro-environ Res 6:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peralta RC, Forghani A, Fayad H (2014) Multiobjective genetic algorithm conjunctive use optimization for production, cost, and energy with dynamic return flow. J Hydrol 511:776–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pool M, Carrera J (2010) Dynamics of negative hydraulic barriers to prevent seawater intrusion. Hydrogeol J 18:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ros SEM, Zuurbier KG (2017) The Impact of Integrated Aquifer Storage and Recovery and Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis (ASRRO) on a Coastal Groundwater System. Water 9:273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roumasset JA, Wada CA (2010) Optimal and sustainable groundwater extraction. Sustainability 2:2676–2685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roy DK, Datta B (2017a) Genetic algorithm tuned fuzzy inference system to evolve optimal groundwater extraction strategies to control saltwater intrusion in multi-layered coastal aquifers under parameter uncertainty. Model Earth Syst Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0398-5 Google Scholar
  51. Roy DK, Datta B (2017b) Saltwater intrusion processes in coastal aquifers—modelling and management: a review. Desalin Water Treat 78:57–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shu C, Ouarda T (2008) Regional flood frequency analysis at ungauged sites using the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. J Hydrol 349:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sreekanth J, Datta B (2010) Multi-objective management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers using genetic programming and modular neural network based surrogate models. J Hydrol 393:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sreekanth J, Datta B (2011) Coupled simulation-optimization model for coastal aquifer management using genetic programming-based ensemble surrogate models and multiple-realization optimization. Water Resour Res.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009683 Google Scholar
  55. Tu JV (1996) Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1225–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wen Y, Cai C, Liu X, Pei J, Zhu X, Xiao T (2009) Corrosion rate prediction of 3C steel under different seawater environment by using support vector regression. Corros Sci 51:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu C-H, Ho J-M, Lee D-T (2004) Travel-time prediction with support vector regression. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 5:276–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang H, Chan L, King I (2002) Support vector machine regression for volatile stock market prediction. In: International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning. Springer, pp 391–396Google Scholar
  59. Yoon H, Jun S-C, Hyun Y, Bae G-O, Lee K-K (2011) A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer. J Hydrol 396:128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yu P-S, Chen S-T, Chang I-F (2006) Support vector regression for real-time flood stage forecasting. J Hydrol 328:704–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang G, Ge H (2012) Prediction of xylanase optimal temperature by support vector regression. Electron J Biotechnol 15:7–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhong Z-D, Zhu X-J, Cao G-Y (2006) Modeling a PEMFC by a support vector machine. J Power Sources 160:293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Civil Engineering, College of Science & EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations