Advertisement

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 1707–1725 | Cite as

Genetic algorithm tuned fuzzy inference system to evolve optimal groundwater extraction strategies to control saltwater intrusion in multi-layered coastal aquifers under parameter uncertainty

  • Dilip Kumar Roy
  • Bithin Datta
Original Article

Abstract

Excessive withdrawal of groundwater resources poses significant challenges to the management of saltwater intrusion processes in coastal aquifers. Optimization of groundwater withdrawal rates plays a vital role in sustainable management of coastal aquifers. This study proposes a genetic algorithm (GA) tuned Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) hybrid model (GA-FIS) for developing a regional scale saltwater intrusion management strategy. GA is used to tune the FIS parameters in order to obtain the optimal FIS structure. The GA-FIS models thus obtained are linked externally to the Controlled Elitist Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm (CEMGA) in order to derive optimal pumping management strategies using a linked simulation–optimization approach. The performance of the hybrid GA-FIS-CEMGA based saltwater intrusion management model is compared with that of a basic adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) based management model (ANFIS-CEMGA). The parameters of the ANFIS model are tuned using hybrid algorithm. To achieve computational efficiency, the proposed optimization routine is run in a parallel processing platform. An illustrative multi-layered coastal aquifer system is used to evaluate the performances of both management models. The illustrative aquifer system considers uncertainties associated with the hydrogeological parameters e.g. hydraulic conductivity, compressibility, bulk density, and aquifer recharge. The evaluation results show that the proposed saltwater intrusion management models are able to evolve reliable optimal groundwater extraction strategies to control saltwater intrusion for the illustrative multi-layered coastal aquifer system. However, a closer look at the performance evaluation results demonstrate the superiority of the GA-FIS-CEMGA based management model over ANFIS-CEMGA based saltwater intrusion management model.

Keywords

Saltwater intrusion Fuzzy inference system Genetic algorithm Controlled elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm Parameter uncertainty 

References

  1. Ababou R, Al-Bitar A (2004) Salt water intrusion with heterogeneity and uncertainty: mathematical modeling and analyses. Dev Water Sci 55:1559–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araghi S, Khosravi A, Creighton D (2015) Design of an optimal ANFIS traffic signal controller by using cuckoo search for an isolated intersection. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, 9–12 Oct 2015, pp 2078–2083.  https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2015.363
  3. Basser H et al (2015) Hybrid ANFIS–PSO approach for predicting optimum parameters of a protective spur dike. Appl Soft Comput 30:642–649.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bezdek JC, Ehrlich R, Full W (1984) FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput Geosci 10:191–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(84)90020-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharjya RK, Datta B (2009) ANN-GA-based model for multiple objective management of coastal aquifers. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 135:314–322.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2009)135:5(314) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casillas J, Cordón O, Herrera F, Magdalena L (2003) Accuracy improvements to find the balance interpretability-accuracy in linguistic fuzzy modeling: an overview. In: Casillas J, Cordón O, Herrera F, Magdalena L (eds) Accuracy improvements in linguistic fuzzy modeling. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37058-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christelis V, Mantoglou A (2016) Pumping optimization of coastal aquifers assisted by adaptive metamodelling methods and radial basis functions. Water Resour Manag 30:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1337-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deb K (1999) An introduction to genetic algorithms. Sadhana 24:293–315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02823145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deb K, Goel T (2001) Controlled elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms for better convergence. In: Zitzler E, Thiele L, Deb K, Coello Coello CA, Corne D (eds) Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization: first international conference. EMO 2001 Zurich, Switzerland, March 7–9, 2001 proceedings. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44719-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization:NSGA-II. In: Schoenauer M, Deb K, Rudolph G, Yao X, Lutton E, Merelo JJ, Schwefel H-P (eds) Parallel problem solving from nature. Springer, Berlin, pp 849–858.  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45356-3 Google Scholar
  11. Dhar A, Datta B (2009) Saltwater intrusion management of coastal aquifers. I: linked simulation-optimization. J Hydrol Eng 14:1263–1272.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co, Inc, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Green PJ, Silverman BW (1993) Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: a roughness penalty approach. Taylor & Francis, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  15. Holman D, Sridharan M, Gowda P, Porter D, Marek T, Howell T, Moorhead J (2014) Gaussian process models for reference ET estimation from alternative meteorological data sources. J Hydrol 517:28–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsieh WW, Tang B (1998) Applying neural network models to prediction and data analysis in meteorology and oceanography. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:1855–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hussain MS, Javadi AA, Ahangar-Asr A, Farmani R (2015) A surrogate model for simulation–optimization of aquifer systems subjected to seawater intrusion. J Hydrol 523:542–554.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ishigami H, Fukuda T, Shibata T, Arai F (1995) Structure optimization of fuzzy neural network by genetic algorithm. Fuzzy Sets Syst 71:257–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)00283-d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jalalkamali A (2015) Using of hybrid fuzzy models to predict spatiotemporal groundwater quality parameters. Earth Sci Inf 8:885–894.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-015-0222-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jang J-SR (1991) Fuzzy modeling using generalized neural networks and Kalman filter algorithm, vol 2. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ninth national conference on artificial intelligence, AnaheimGoogle Scholar
  21. Jang J-SR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:665–685.  https://doi.org/10.1587/transfun.E99.A.963 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jang J-SR, Sun CT, Mizutani E (1997) Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: A computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  23. Kourakos G, Mantoglou A (2009) Pumping optimization of coastal aquifers based on evolutionary algorithms and surrogate modular neural network models. Adv Water Resour 32:507–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee C-H, Teng C-C (2001) Fine tuning of membership functions for fuzzy neural systems Asian. J Control 3:216–225.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1934-6093.2001.tb00060.x Google Scholar
  25. Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35:233–241.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin HJ, Rechards DR, Talbot CA, Yeh GT, Cheng JR, Cheng HP, Jones NL (1997) A three-dimensional finite-element computer model for simulating density-dependent flow and transport in variable saturated media, Version 3.0. US Army Engineering Researchand Development Center, Vicksburg, p 143Google Scholar
  27. MathWorks (2017a) fcm: fuzzy c-means clustering MATLAB documentation. https://aumathworks.com/help/fuzzy/fcm.html. Accessed 30 Aug 2017
  28. MathWorks (2017b) MATLAB version R2017a. The Mathworks Inc, MathworksGoogle Scholar
  29. MathWorks (2017c) Parallel computing toolbox: MATLAB version R2017a. The Mathworks Inc, MathworksGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohammadi K, Shamshirband S, Petković D, Yee PL, Mansor Z (2016) Using ANFIS for selection of more relevant parameters to predict dew point temperature. Appl Therm Eng 96:311–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.11.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oliveira MV, Schirru R (2009) Applying particle swarm optimization algorithm for tuning a neuro-fuzzy inference system for sensor monitoring. Prog Nucl Energy 51:177–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2008.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pebesma EJ, Heuvelink GBM (1999) Latin hypercube sampling of Gaussian random fields. Technometrics 41:303–312.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1271347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pillay N (2004) An investigation into the use of genetic programming for the induction of novice procedural programming solution algorithms in intelligent programming tutors. Dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, DurbanGoogle Scholar
  34. Piret C (2007) Analytical and numerical advances in radial basis functions. Dissertation, University of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  35. Rini DP, Shamsuddin SM, Yuhaniz SS (2016) Particle swarm optimization for ANFIS interpretability and accuracy. Soft Comput 20:251–262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1498-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roy DK, Datta B (2017a) Fuzzy c-mean clustering based inference system for saltwater intrusion processes prediction in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Manag 31:355–376.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1531-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roy DK, Datta B (2017b) Multivariate adaptive regression spline ensembles for management of multilayered coastal aquifers. J Hydrol Eng 22:04017031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roy DK, Datta B (2017c) Optimal management of groundwater extraction to control saltwater intrusion in multi-layered coastal aquifers using ensembles of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. World Environ Water Resour Congr.  https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480595.013 Google Scholar
  39. Shiri J, Kişi Ö (2011) Comparison of genetic programming with neuro-fuzzy systems for predicting short-term water table depth fluctuations. Comput Geosci 37:1692–1701.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sóbester A, Forrester AIJ, Toal DJJ, Tresidder E, Tucker S (2014) Engineering design applications of surrogate-assisted optimization techniques. Optim Eng 15:243–265.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-012-9199-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sreekanth J, Datta B (2010) Multi-objective management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers using genetic programming and modular neural network based surrogate models. J Hydrol 393:245–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sreekanth J, Datta B (2011a) Comparative evaluation of genetic programming and neural network as potential surrogate models for coastal aquifer management. Water Resour Manag 25:3201–3218.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9852-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sreekanth J, Datta B (2011b) Optimal combined operation of production and barrier wells for the control of saltwater intrusion in coastal groundwater well fields. Desalin Water Treat 32:72–78.  https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2011.2680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sreekanth J, Datta B, Mohapatra PK (2012) Optimal short-term reservoir operation with integrated long-term goals. Water Resour Manag 26:2833–2850.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0051-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sugeno M (1985) Industrial applications of fuzzy control. Elsevier Science Inc., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  46. Sugeno M, Yasukawa T (1993) A fuzzy logic based approach to qualitative modeling. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 1:7–31.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.1993.390281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15:116–132.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tang AM, Quek C, Ng GS (2005) GA-TSKfnn: parameters tuning of fuzzy neural network using genetic algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 29:769–781.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Werbos PJ (1974) Beyond regression: new tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Willmott CJ (1984) On the evaluation of model performance in physical geography. In: Gaile GL, Willmott CJ (eds) Spatial statistics and models. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 443–460.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3048-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zanaganeh M, Mousavi SJ, Etemad Shahidi AF (2009) A hybrid genetic algorithm-adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system in prediction of wave parameters. Eng Appl Artif Intell 22:1194–1202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2009.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zeng X-J, Singh MG (1996) A relationship between membership functions and approximation accuracy in fuzzy systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 26:176–180.  https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.484451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Civil Engineering, College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityDouglasAustralia

Personalised recommendations