Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Groundwater recharge modelling in a large scale basin: an example using the SWAT hydrologic model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater constitutes an essential resource that augments surface water resources in meeting the water supply needs of man and the ecosystem. Most importantly in arid and semi-arid environments where rainfall patterns are erratic, groundwater resources are often the preferred source of water. This causes enormous pressure on the resource leading to diminishing groundwater resources. Land use changes also impact on groundwater resources through alterations in the hydrologic regime. It is imperative therefore to evaluate groundwater recharge dynamics under changing land uses to provide for a better resource planning and allocation. We present in this study, an investigation into groundwater recharge dynamics of the Olifants Basin, a water stressed basin in Southern Africa over the past decade with considerations to land use changes. Three land use change scenarios were developed to simulate the groundwater recharge of the basin within the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) environment. The SWAT model was calibrated (1988–2001) and validated (2002–2013) with good model performance statistics; NSE, R2, PBIAS, RSR of 0.88, 0.89, −11.49%, 0.34 and 0.67, 0.78, −20.69%, 0.57 respectively for calibration and validation stages. Findings indicate groundwater recharge declined by 10.37 mm (30.3%) and 2.34 mm (9.82%) during the periods 2000–2007 and 2007–2013 respectively. The decline in groundwater recharge was linked to the changes in urban (9.2%), agriculture (6.1%), rangelands (−16.8%) during the period 2000–2007 and urban (1.3%), agricultural (14%), rangelands (−14.8%) during 2007–2013. The SWAT model reveals it capabilities as a decision support tool (DST) in groundwater recharge assessment for large scale basins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams S, Titus R, Xu Y (2004) Groundwater recharge assessment of the basement aquifers of central Namaqualand. Report to Water Research Commission. WRC Report No. 1093/1/04. ISBN: 1-77005-214-3

  • Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer WE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensing data. USGS Prof Paper 964:138–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrol Process 19:563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment: part 1. Model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aston JJ (2000) Conceptual overview of the Olifants River Basin’s groundwater, South Africa. Occasional paper. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI); Lynwood, South Africa: University of Pretoria, African Water Issues Research Unit (AWIRU), p 17. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/39178. Accessed 04 June 2016

  • Baker TJ, Miller SN (2013) Using the soil and water assessmnent tool (SWAT) to assess land use impact on water resources in an East African watershed. J Hydrol 486:100–111. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borah DK, Bera M (2003) Watershed—scale hydrologic and nonpoint—source pollution models: review of mathematical bases. Trans ASAE 46(6):1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai T, Li Q, Yu M, Lu G, Cheng L, Wei X (2012) Investigation into the impacts of land use change on sediment yield characteristics in the upper Huaihe River basin, China. Phys Chem Earth (B) 53–54: 1–9

  • Calow RC, MacDonald AM (2009) What will climate change mean for groundwater supply in Africa. ODI background note. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Calow RC, Robins NS, MacDonald AM, MacDonald DMJ, Gibbs BR, Orpen WRG, Mtembezeka P, Andrews AJ, Appiah SO (1997) Groundwater management in drought-prone areas of Africa. Int J Water Res Dev 13(2):241–262. doi:10.1080/07900629749863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lange M, Merrey DJ, Levite H, Svendsen M (2003) Water resources planning and management in the Olifants Basin of South Africa: past, present and future. IWMI, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll P, Hoffmann-Dobrev H, Portman FT, Siebert S, Eicker A, Rodell M, Strassberg G, Scanlon BR (2012) Impact of water withdrawals from groundwater and surface water on continental water storage variations. J Geodyn 59–60:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DWA (2011) Development of a reconciliation strategy for the Olifants River water supply system. Groundwater options report. Report no. PWMA 04/B50/00/8310/10, DWA, Pretoria, South Africa

  • DWAF (1991) Water resources planning of the Olifants River Basin—study of development potential and management of the water resources. Pretoria

  • DWAF (2002) Proposal for the establishment of a Catchment Management Agency for the Olifants water management area—Appendix C. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkoski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Partz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequence of land use. Science 309:570–574. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffari G, Keesstra S, Ghodousi J, Ahmadi H (2010) SWAT—simulated hydrological impact of land use change in the Zanjanrood Basin, Northwest Iran. Hydrol Process 24:892–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Githui F, Gitau W, Mutua F, Bauwens W (2009) Climate change impact on SWAT simulated streamflow in western Kenya. Int J Climatol 29:1823–1834. doi: 10.1002/joc.1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 Billion people. Science 327:812–818. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GWP (2014) The links between land use and groundwater—governance provisions and management strategies to secure a sustainable harvest. http://www.gwp.org/Global/ToolBox/Publications/Perspective%20Papers/perspective_paper_landuse_and_groundwater_no6_english.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2017

  • Gyamfi C, Ndambuki JM, Salim RW (2016a) A historical analysis of rainfall trend in the Olifants Basin in South Africa. Earth Sci Res 5(1):129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyamfi C, Ndambuki JM, Salim RW (2016b) Application of SWAT Model to the Olifants Basin: calibration, validation and uncertainty analysis. J Water Resour Prot 8:397–410. doi:10.4236/jwarp.2016.83033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson FDI, Krantz RM (1998) Groundwater quality deterioration in the Olifants River catchment above the Loskop dam with specialized investigations in the Witbank dam sub-Catchment. In: WRC Report no. 291/1/98. Water Research Commission, Pretoria

  • Lerner DN, Harris B (2009) The relationship between land use and groundwater resources and quality. Land Use Policy S265-S273

  • Lin B, Chen X, Yao H, Chen Y, Liu M, Gao L, James A (2015) Analysis of landuse change impacts on catchment runoff using different time indicators based on SWAT model. Ecol Indic 58:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartney MP, Arranz R (2007) Evaluation of historic, current and future demand in the Olifants River catchment, South Africa. Research Report 118, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka. IWMI

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2009) Soil and water assessment tool. Theoretical documentation version 2009. Grassland, soil and research service, Temple, TX

  • Nie W, Yuan Y, Kepner W, Nash MS, Jackson M, Erickson C (2011) Assessing impacts of land use and land cover changes on hydrology for the upper San Pedro watershed. J Hydrol 407:105–114. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oeurng C, Sauvage S, Sanchez-Perez J (2011) Assessment of hydrology, sediment and particulate organic carbon yield in a large agricultural catchment using the SWAT model. J Hydrol 401:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parson R, Conrad J (1998) Explanatory notes for the aquifer classification map of South Africa. WRC Report No KV 116/98, ISBN 186845468

  • Robins NS, Fergusson J (2014) Groundwater scarcity and conflict - managing hotspots. Earth perspectives 1(6):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Hauck L (2001) Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(5):1169–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalon BR, Reedy RC, Stonestrom DA, Prudic DE, Dennehy KF (2005) Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US. Glob Change Biol 11:1577–1593. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01026.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCS (1972) Sect. 4: hydrology In National Engineering Handbook. SCS

  • Srinivasan MS, Gerald-Marchant P, Veith TL, Gburek WJ, Steenhuis TS (2005) Watershed-scale modeling of critical source areas of runoff generation and phosphorus transport. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(2): 361-375

  • Tang LH, Yang DW, Hu HP, Gao B (2011) Detecting the effect of land use change on streamflow, sediment and nutrient losses by distributed hydrological simulation. J Hydrol 409:172–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi MP, Panda RK, Raghuwanshi NS (2005) Development of effective management plan for critical subwatersheds using SWAT model. Hydrol Process 19:809–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Liew MW, Garbrecht J (2003) Hydrologic simulation of the little washita river experimental watershed using SWAT. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39(2):413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venetis C (1969) A study of the recession of unconfined aquifers. B Int Assoc Sci Hydrol 14(4):119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorosmarty C, Lettenmaier D, Leveque C, Meybeck M, Pahl-Wostl C, Alcamo J, Cosgrove W, Grassl H, Hoft H, Kabat P, Lansigan F, Lawford R, Naiman R (2004) Humans transforming the global water system. Eos 85:509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Kang S, Zhang L, Li F (2008) Modelling hydrological response to different land use and climate change scenarios in the Zamu River basin of the northwest China. Hydrol Process 22:2502–2510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Xia J, Chen J (2009) Quantification of the effects of climate variations and human activities on runoff by a monthly water balance model: a case study of the Chaobai River Basin in Northern China. Water Resour Res 45: W00A11

  • Yan B, Fang NF, Zhang PC, Shi ZH (2013) Impacts of land use change on watershed streamflow and sediment yield: An assessment using hydrologic modelling and partial least squares regression. J Hydrol 484:26–37. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesuf HM, Assen M, Alamirew T, Melesse AM (2015) Modeling of sediment yield in Maybar gauged watershed using SWAT. northeast Ethiopia Catena 127:191–205

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Gyamfi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gyamfi, C., Ndambuki, J.M., Anornu, G.K. et al. Groundwater recharge modelling in a large scale basin: an example using the SWAT hydrologic model. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 3, 1361–1369 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0383-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0383-z

Keywords

Navigation